Comparison of sEMG activity of submental muscles between the head‐lift exercise, tongue‐press exercise and the head extension tongue‐press exercise in healthy young adults

Mahla Nejadmoghbeli,Mohammadreza Behboodi,Gitta Kalbassi,Marziyeh Poorjavad
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13819
2024-09-11
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Abstract:Comparison of submental muscle activation between the proposed Head Extension Tongue‐Press Exercise (HETPE) and traditional maneuvers (Head‐Lift Exercise (HLE) and Tongue‐Press Exercise (TPE)) in healthy young adults, using surface electromyography (sEMG). Participants' irritation levels were also assessed via a questionnaire during the maneuvers. The results suggest that HETPE offers greater muscle activation while maintaining manageable irritation levels. Background Swallowing is a complex function that requires precise coordination between different muscles. Weakness in submental muscles can lead to complications such as pharyngeal residue and aspiration. Therefore, exercise interventions targeting these muscles, such as the Head‐Lift Exercise (HLE), are clinically important but pose challenges. Objective(s) This study aimed to compare the myoelectric activity of submental muscles during traditional Head‐Lift Exercise (HLE), Tongue‐Press Exercise (TPE) and Head Extension Tongue‐Press Exercise (HETPE), providing potential alternatives to HLE. Methods Thirty healthy volunteers (22 females and 8 males, mean age 25.63 ± 5.27 years) participated in this cross‐sectional study. Surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded activity of the submental muscles bilaterally during HLE, TPE and HETPE. Participants performed each manoeuvre for 14 s, repeated three times in a counterbalanced order. Statistical analyses assessed differences in mean, maximum and median frequency of the sEMG signals among manoeuvres using repeated‐measures analysis of variance (RM‐ANOVA). The experienced irritation levels by participants during manoeuvres were also compared by the Friedman test. Results HETPE exhibited significantly higher maximum sEMG activity compared to HLE and TPE (p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?