Can legume species, crop residue management or no-till mitigate nitrous oxide emissions from a legume-wheat crop rotation in a semi-arid environment?

Guangdi D. Li,Graeme D. Schwenke,Richard C. Hayes,Adam J. Lowrie,Richard J. Lowrie,Graeme J. Poile,Albert A. Oates,Binbin Xu,Maheswaran Rohan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104910
IF: 7.366
2021-05-01
Soil and Tillage Research
Abstract:<p>Soil emissions of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) are generally low in Australian semi-arid cropping systems, but can be reduced further by incorporating legumes into cereal-based rotations. We used automated and manual chambers to compare N<sub>2</sub>O emissions throughout a two-year legume-wheat field experiment. Two pulse crops [lupin (<em>Lupinus angustifolius</em> L.) and field pea (<em>Pisum sativum</em> L.)] and two forage legumes [vetch (<em>Vicia sativa</em> L.) and clover (a mixture of four <em>Trifolium</em> spp.)] were grown in the first year, followed by a wheat (<em>Triticum aestivum</em> L.) crop in the second year without additional nitrogen (N) fertilizer under either no-till or tillage systems. All legume crops were either (<em>a</em>) chemically terminated at anthesis (brown-manured, BM), or (<em>b</em>) cut for hay (forage legumes) or harvested for grain (pulses) (product-removed, PR). The fate of legume N in the BM treatment was traced using <sup>15</sup>N labelled urea applied to soil in micro-plots. Results showed that N<sub>2</sub>O emissions during the legume and wheat phases were mostly unaffected by legume species, the exception being lower emissions from the BM clover pasture under the no-till treatment. Under the PR treatment, tillage tended to increase N<sub>2</sub>O emissions compared with the no-till treatment during both legume (121 <em>vs.</em> 104 g N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) and wheat phases (91 <em>vs.</em> 79 g N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). In contrast, a mixed result was found under the BM treatment with a significant tillage × crop management interaction during the legume phase, but no effect of tillage during the wheat phase. In general, the BM treatment promoted more N<sub>2</sub>O emissions due to more N input into soil compared to the PR treatment, with the impact extending into the subsequent wheat crop. The N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from the BM treatment during the legume (195 g N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) and wheat phase (181 g N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) were greater than those from the PR treatment for the corresponding phases (113 <em>vs</em>. 85 g N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). The <sup>15</sup>N study showed that the majority of legume-derived N was retained in the soil at the end of the legume phase and likely to be readily available for the subsequent cereal crop. The mitigation of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions derived from legumes in a semi-arid cereal-based cropping system can be optimized in a no-till system where product removal is practiced (cut for hay or harvested for grain) with legume species choice having little or no additional impact.</p>
soil science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?