Abstract:Using a set of oscillator strengths and excited-state dipole moments of near full configuration interaction quality determined for small compounds, we benchmark the performances of several single-reference wave function methods [CC2, CCSD, CC3, CCSDT, ADC(2), and ADC(3/2)] and time-dependent density-functional theory (TD-DFT) with various functionals (B3LYP, PBE0, M06-2X, CAM-B3LYP, and ωB97X-D). We consider the impact of various gauges (length, velocity, and mixed) and formalisms: equation of motion versus linear response, relaxed versus unrelaxed orbitals, and so forth. Beyond the expected accuracy improvements and a neat decrease of formalism sensitivity when using higher-order wave function methods, the present contribution shows that, for both ADC(2) and CC2, the choice of gauge impacts more significantly the magnitude of the oscillator strengths than the choice of formalism and that CCSD yields a notable improvement on this transition property as compared to CC2. For the excited-state dipole moments, switching on orbital relaxation appreciably improves the accuracy of both ADC(2) and CC2 but has a rather small effect at the CCSD level. Going from ground to excited states, the typical errors on dipole moments for a given method tend to roughly triple. Interestingly, the ADC(3/2) oscillator strengths and dipoles are significantly more accurate than their ADC(2) counterparts, whereas the two models do deliver rather similar absolute errors for transition energies. Concerning TD-DFT, one finds: (i) a rather negligible impact of the gauge on oscillator strengths for all tested functionals (except for M06-2X); (ii) deviations of <i>ca.</i> 0.10 D on ground-state dipoles for all functionals; (iii) strong differences between excited-state dipoles obtained with, on the one hand, B3LYP and PBE0 and, on the other hand, M06-2X, CAM-B3LYP, and ωB97X-D, the latter group being markedly more accurate with the selected basis set; and (iv) the better overall performance of CAM-B3LYP for the two considered excited-state properties. Finally, for all investigated properties, both the accuracy and consistency obtained with the second-order wave function approaches, ADC(2) and CC2, do not clearly outperform those of TD-DFT, hinting that assessing the accuracy of the latter (or selecting a specific functional) on the basis of the results of the former is not systematically a well-settled strategy.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01228?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01228</a>.Additional reference data for five compounds; raw values for transition energies; oscillator strengths; dipole moments; excited state dipoles; basis set effects for water; and Cartesian coordinates (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01228/suppl_file/ct0c01228_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

A comparison of QTP functionals against coupled-cluster methods for EAs of small organic molecules

Comparison of the Performance of Exact-Exchange-Based Density Functional Methods

Quantum Mechanical Calculation of Noncovalent Interactions: A Large-Scale Evaluation of PMx, DFT, and SAPT Approaches

Comparison of DFT methods for molecular orbital eigenvalue calculations.

Do Practical Standard Coupled Cluster Calculations Agree Better than Kohn-Sham Calculations with Currently Available Functionals When Compared to the Best Available Experimental Data for Dissociation Energies of Bonds to 3d Transition Metals?

Performance of EOM-CCSD(T)(a)*-Based Quartic Force Fields in Computing Fundamental, Anharmonic Vibrational Frequencies of Molecular Electronically Excited States with Application to the Ã 1 A ′′ State of :CCH 2 (Vinylidene)

Benchmarking TD-DFT and Wave Function Methods for Oscillator Strengths and Excited-State Dipole Moments

Big data benchmarking: how do DFT methods across the rungs of Jacob's ladder perform for a dataset of 122k CCSD(T) total atomization energies?

The Extended Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof Functional With Improved Accuracy For Thermodynamic And Electronic Properties Of Molecular Systems

Benchmarking Quantum Mechanical Levels of Theory for Valence Parametrization in Force Fields

eQE 2.0: Subsystem DFT beyond GGA functionals

Benchmarking Density Functionals on Structural Parameters of Small-/Medium-Sized Organic Molecules.

Polishing the Gold Standard: The Role of Orbital Choice in CCSD(T) Vibrational Frequency Prediction

Implementation and benchmark of a long-range corrected functional in the density functional based tight-binding method

Semilocal Kinetic Energy Density Functionals on Atoms and Diatoms

Calculations of ionization energies and electron affinities for atoms and molecules: A comparative study with different methods

Comparison of the DFT-SAPT and Canonical EDA Schemes for the Energy Decomposition of Various Types of Noncovalent Interactions

Ab Initio Calculation of Coupling-Constant Averaged Exchange-Correlation Holes for Spherically Symmetric Atoms

Calibration of Several First Excited State Properties for Organic Molecules through Systematic Comparison of TDDFT with Experimental Spectra

Accurate Prediction of Noncovalent Interaction Energies with the Effective Fragment Potential Method: Comparison of Energy Components to Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory for the S22 Test Set