Benchmarking Quantum Mechanical Levels of Theory for Valence Parametrization in Force Fields

Pavan Kumar Behara,Hyesu Jang,Joshua Horton,Trevor Gokey,David Dotson,Simon Boothroyd,Christopher Bayly,Daniel Cole,Lee-Ping Wang,David Mobley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-7sv95-v3
2024-05-14
Abstract:A wide range of density functional methods and basis sets are available to derive the electronic structure and properties of molecules. Quantum mechanical calculations are too computationally intensive for routine simulation of molecules in the condensed phase, prompting the development of computationally efficient force fields based on quantum mechanical data. Parametrizing general force fields, which cover a vast chemical space, necessitates generating sizable quantum mechanical datasets with optimized geometries and torsion scans. To achieve this efficiently, it is crucial to choose a quantum mechanical method that balances computational cost and accuracy. In this study we seek to assess the accuracy of quantum mechanical theory for specific properties such as conformer energies, and torsion energetics. To comprehensively evaluate various methods, we focus on a representative set of 59 diverse small molecules, comparing approximately 25 combinations of functional and basis sets against the reference level coupled cluster calculations at complete basis set limit.
Chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses the problem of selecting suitable theories for force field parameterization at the quantum mechanical level. The research focuses on evaluating the accuracy and computational efficiency of different quantum mechanical methods in describing the electronic state parameters of molecules, especially small organic compounds in medicinal chemistry-related chemical spaces. The researchers selected a representative set of 59 diverse small molecules and compared the results of approximately 25 function and basis set combinations to the benchmark results obtained from coupled-cluster calculations with a complete basis set. The paper points out that although quantum mechanical calculations are computationally intensive for accurate simulation of molecular behavior in condensed phases, they are necessary for generating datasets used for force field parameterization. These datasets include optimized geometries, torsional energy profiles, and other information. The study emphasizes the need for a quantum mechanical method that balances computational cost and accuracy to efficiently generate such datasets and ensure that the trained force field accurately predicts the conformational and torsional energy profiles of molecules. In the study, the authors compared various density functional theory (DFT) methods and basis set combinations, such as B3LYP-D3(BJ)/DZVP, B97-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP, as well as different types of hybrid functionals. They also paid special attention to the performance of charged molecules, as these molecules are important in drug design and biomolecular simulations. By conducting one-dimensional torsional scans, they investigated the accuracy of different methods in predicting torsional energy profiles and looked for deviations from the reference level theory (such as CCSD(T)/CBS) within an acceptable range of 0.5 to 1 kcal/mol. The results showed that the ωB97M-D3(BJ)/DZVP method performed the best in describing conformational energies, while the currently used B3LYP-D3(BJ)/DZVP method had a slightly higher relative error but was still close to the optimum. The paper also discusses the advantages and disadvantages of various methods and their performance in different chemical environments, providing guidance for future force field parameterization and molecular simulations.