Head and neck soft tissue sarcoma patient: age and tumor region are predictive in disease free survival and overall survival

YiMing Chen,Sandhya Gokavarapu,Ahmed Abdelrehem,Tong Ji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2024.02.015
IF: 1.9
2024-03-07
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Abstract:Background Head and neck soft tissue sarcoma (HNSTS), rare and heterogeneous malignancies, are treated primarily treated with surgery. However, prognostic indicators that might guide HNSTS management are poorly defined. Purpose Main purpose of this study is to find variables linked to HNSTS patients' prognosis. Assessment of TNM system is the secondary purpose. Study design, setting, sample This study is a retrospective cohort performed on HNSTS patients received surgery at department of Oral and Maxillofacial Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University from 01/01/2006 to 31/12/2014. Strict inclusion criteria were applied. Predictor variable The predictor variable was a set of heterogenous risk factors and were grouped into the following categories: demographic (age and gender), clnical (primary tumor, tumor region, tumor size and TNM stage) and treatment (surgical margin, treatment therapy). Main outcome variable(s) The primary outcome variables were time to 5-year disease free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome variables were time to 5-year tumor local recurrence (LR) and metastais (MT). Covariates Not applicable. Analyses Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out. Pearson chi-square test was employed in univariate analysis. Cox regression was modified for multiple variable analysis with components had significant p values in univariale analysis or variables with potential prognostic value. Log-rank test was applied to compare survival situation under various variables. P value less than 0.05 was statistically significant. Results The sample was composed of 100 subjects with a mean age of 43.47 (SD:16.15) years old and 56 (56%) were male. The 5-year DSF and OS were 59% and 60%, respectively. Variables associated with poor DFS and OS were age > 60 years (P=0.003, HR:4.95, 95% CI:1.71,14.1; P=0.005, HR:4.48, 95% CI:1.57,12.8 ) and non-primary tumors (P<0.001, HR:8.41, 95%CI:2.85,24.8; P=0.002, HR:6.90, 95%CI:2.46,19.4), respectively. Maxilla and skull base cancers had LR (12/18, 66.7%) more common. T2 (TNM) tumor displayed higher tendency in DFS(P=0.009, HR:4.20, 95%CI:1.42,12.4) and MT(P=0.09, HR:3.51, 95%CI: 0.82,15.0) than T1 (TNM) tumors. Conclusions and Relevance Poor prognosis is associated with maxilla and skull base tumors as well as patients over 60 years. TNM stage appeared to have limited prognostic significance.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?