Enhancing Diagnosis and Prognosis by Assessing the Clinical, Morphological, and Behavior Aspects in Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Bogdan Serban,Mihnea Ioan Gabriel Popa,Adrian Cursaru,Bogdan Cretu,Georgian L Iacobescu,Catalin Cirstoiu,Sergiu Iordache
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.64025
2024-07-07
Cureus
Abstract:Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are an uncommon and diverse group of cancers, consisting of more than 80 different kinds, each showing unique mesenchymal differentiation as described by the World Health Organization (WHO). The prognostic factors at the time of diagnosis mostly depend on the size, depth, and histological grade of the lymphatic involvement. Improved prognostic indicators are necessary to identify patients at high risk who may derive advantages from adjuvant therapy and those at low risk who might avoid treatment-related side effects. Over a period of five years, a considerable number of patients experience the recurrence of the tumor in the same area or the metastasis of the disease to other parts of the body, even after the complete removal of the localized tumor through surgery. To further personalize and focus medicines, it is critical to enhance prediction accuracy and uncover new therapy targets. This is particularly important considering the high mortality and morbidity rate associated with metastatic STS. The significant diversity of STS poses difficulty in comprehending its pathobiology and in converting biological progress into therapeutic application. This prospective cohort study was carried out at a major university hospital to ascertain adult patients who were diagnosed with STS of the extremities between the period from 2018 to 2023. The inclusion criteria were individuals who were 18 years of age or older with a histological diagnosis of STS. The exclusion criteria encompassed individuals with malignancies other than STS and those with inadequate data on essential factors. Thorough assessments were conducted to analyze patient demographics, tumor features (including site, size, depth, neurovascular or bone invasion), and histologic type and grade (according to the French Federation of Cancer Centers (FNCLCC) grading system). The purpose was to find predictive markers and evaluate results. The results are consistent with previous research and enhance our current knowledge of STS prognosis. Key prognostic markers for metastasis and mortality risk include tumor size larger than 5 cm, histologic grade, and sarcoma subtype. Radical surgical procedures, such as amputation or disarticulation, did not show any survival advantage, probably because they were used in situations where the disease had already progressed locally and had significant involvement in the blood vessels. Histologic grading has been identified as the most important factor in predicting the likelihood of metastasis in adult STSs. The study found that most tumors were of high grade, and there was a statistically significant association between tumor grade, Ki67 levels, and overall survival. A small proportion of patients experienced prolonged longevity beyond five years, emphasizing the connection between early detection, tumors of lesser severity, and enhanced results. These observations emphasize the significance of accurate prognostic assessments and customized therapeutic approaches in the treatment of STS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?