Abstract:Objective This study aimed to describe scholarly activity training during neonatal–perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowship and factors associated with scholarship productivity. Study Design NPM fellowship program directors (FPDs) were surveyed between March and October 2019, as part of a larger study of all pediatric subspecialty programs, to define barriers, resources, and productivity for fellow scholarly activity. High productivity was defined as >75% of fellows in a program in the last 5 years having a manuscript accepted for publication based on fellowship scholarly work. Results Fifty-four percent (54/100) of NPM FPDs completed the survey. Nineteen fellowship programs (35%, 19/54) met the definition for high productivity. High productivity in scholarly activity was associated with a greater likelihood of having funds to conduct scholarship ( p = 0.011), more protected months dedicated to scholarly activity ( p = 0.03), and fellow extramural grant applications (submitted or accepted, p = 0.047). FPDs of productive programs were less likely to report lack of an adequate core research curriculum ( p = 0.018), lack of adequate expertise on the fellowship scholarly oversight committee ( p = 0.048), and lack of sufficient divisional mentorship ( p = 0.048) as barriers to completion of scholarly activity during fellowship. Conclusion Research funding, protected research time, established research mentors, and a research curriculum are associated with higher scholarly activity productivity among NPM fellowship programs. Further investment in these resources may improve scholarly activity productivity during fellowship training. Key Points Fellow productivity depends on protected time. Inadequate funding impacts fellow productivity. Mentorship is important for fellow scholarship. A research curriculum impacts research outcomes. N.F.D. contributed to the methodology, investigation, data curation, visualization, formal analysis, and writing (of the original draft) of the study. As corresponding author, N.F.D. has full access to the data in the study and final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. P.M. contributed to the study's methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, and writing, reviewing, and editing. C.E.L.D. contributed to the study's methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, and writing, reviewing, and editing. P.C. contributed to the study's methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, writing, reviewing, and editing. E.L.A. helped to conceptualize the study, methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, and writing, reviewing, and editing. C.A. contributed to the study's methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, review, and editing. P.W. helped to conceptualize the study, methodology, investigation, data curation, visualization, formal analysis, and writing, reviewing, and editing. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Received: 19 March 2024 Accepted: 14 May 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 15 May 2024 Article published online: 10 June 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

Scholarly Activity during Neonatal–Perinatal Medicine Fellowship

Scholarly maturation and other factors supporting publishing productivity in educational scholarship for clinical faculty

Design and Implementation of a Didactic Curriculum in a Large Neonatal–Perinatal Medicine Fellowship Program: A Single-center Experience

Should neonatal-perinatal medicine move to two-year fellowships?

PA Scholars: What Drives and Inhibits Success?

National needs assessment of emergency medicine faculty regarding scholarly activity practices and support

Factors influencing the interests, career paths, and research activities of recent graduates from an academic, pediatric residency program.

Impact of Early Research Productivity on Future Academic Output Among Head and Neck Fellows

Impact of a Structured Roadmap, Individual Accountability and Support, and Outcome Measurement on the Culture of Scholarship in a Residency Program

Exploring Scholarship and the Emergency Medicine Educator: A Workforce Study

Predicting Academic Productivity Among American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Fellowship Faculty from Publications Acquired Before and During Surgical Training

The Current State of Neonatal Neurodevelopmental Follow-up Programs in North America: A Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium Report

Fellowship for Academic Generalists in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Is It Overdue?

Trends in Residency Academic Productivity of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Fellows Between 2012 and 2019

430 Academic Productivity of Neurosurgical Trainees Is Associated With Productivity of Gender Concordant Faculty

Increasing Neurosurgical Resident Research Productivity Through Cultural Shift: Choosing Carrots Over Sticks

Association of pre-residency publications with research productivity in residency, fellowship, and academic career choice among Canadian ophthalmologists

Perceptions of Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants/Associates Toward the Concept of Developing an Advanced Practice Postgraduate Residency/Fellowship Program at a Large Academic Medical Center

Implementation of the Neonatal Nurse Practitioner Role in a Community Hospital's Labor, Delivery, and Level 1 Postpartum Unit

Perceived barriers to research and scholarship among physicians

"Short stops": peer support of scholarly activity