Abstract:Current research trends have advanced the use of “green propellants” on a wide scale for spacecraft in various space missions; mainly for environmental sustainability and safety concerns. Small satellites, particularly micro and nanosatellites, evolved from passive planetary-orbiting to being able to perform active orbital operations that may require high-thrust impulsive capabilities. Thus, onboard primary and auxiliary propulsion systems capable of performing such orbital operations are required. Novelty in primary propulsion systems design calls for specific attention to miniaturization, which can be achieved, along the above-mentioned orbital transfer capabilities, by utilizing green monopropellants due to their relative high performance together with simplicity, and better storability when compared to gaseous and bi-propellants, especially for miniaturized systems. Owing to the ongoing rapid research activities in the green-propulsion field, it was necessary to extensively study and collect various data of green monopropellants properties and performance that would further assist analysts and designers in the research and development of liquid propulsion systems. This review traces the history and origins of green monopropellants and after intensive study of physicochemical properties of such propellants it was possible to classify green monopropellants to three main classes: Energetic Ionic Liquids (EILs), Liquid NOx Monopropellants, and Hydrogen Peroxide Aqueous Solutions (HPAS). Further, the tabulated data and performance comparisons will provide substantial assistance in using analysis tools—such as: Rocket Propulsion Analysis (RPA) and NASA CEA—for engineers and scientists dealing with chemical propulsion systems analysis and design. Some applications of green monopropellants were discussed through different propulsion systems configurations such as: multi-mode, dual mode, and combined chemical–electric propulsion. Although the in-space demonstrated EILs (i.e., AF-M315E and LMP-103S) are widely proposed and utilized in many space applications, the investigation transpired that NOx fuel blends possess the highest performance, while HPAS yield the lowest performance even compared to hydrazine.

Green micro-resistojet research at Delft University of Technology: new options for Cubesat propulsion

Design, Development, and Performance of an Ammonia Self-Managed Vaporization Propulsion System for Micro-Nano Satellites.

Development and Qualification of Green Propellant Micropump for MicroSat and CubeSat Propulsion Systems

Space micropropulsion systems for Cubesats and small satellites: From proximate targets to furthermost frontiers

The Development of a Next-Generation Latticed Resistojet Thruster for CubeSats

Development of Electric and Chemical Microthrusters

Propulsion Technologies for CubeSats: Review

Performance comparison of green propulsion systems for future Orbital Transfer Vehicles

Bimodal Propulsion System for Small Spacecraft: Design, Fabrication, and Performance Characterization

Multimodal electrospray thruster for small spacecraft: design and experimental characterization

Design and Testing of a Microelectromechanical-System-based High Heat Flux Vaporizing Liquid Microthruster

MEMS and 3D-printing microthrusters technology integrated with hydroxide-based nanoenergetic propellants

Review of State-of-the-Art Green Monopropellants: For Propulsion Systems Analysts and Designers

Design of an Intake and a Thruster for an Atmosphere-Breathing Electric Propulsion System

Modular Impulsive Green Monopropellant Propulsion System (MIMPS-G): For CubeSats in LEO and to the Moon

Development and test of a cost-efficient gridded ion thruster propulsion system for small satellites – IonJet

Development and Laboratory Testing of a CubeSat-Compatible Staged Ionic-Liquid Electrospray Propulsion System

Assessment of Multimode Spacecraft Micropropulsion Systems

CFD-Driven Optimization of Dual-Throat Micro-Nozzle for Enhanced Thrust in Cold Gas Propulsion for Microsatellites

Water and xenon ECR ion thruster—comparison in global model and experiment