Abstract:We analyse the relationships between galaxy morphology, colour, environment and stellar mass using data for over 105 objects from Galaxy Zoo, the largest sample of visually classified morphologies yet compiled. We conclusively show that colour and morphology fractions are very different functions of environment. Both colour and morphology are sensitive to stellar mass. However, at fixed stellar mass, while colour is also highly sensitive to environment, morphology displays much weaker environmental trends. Only a small part of both the morphology–density and colour–density relations can be attributed to the variation in the stellar‐mass function with environment. Galaxies with high stellar masses are mostly red in all environments and irrespective of their morphology. Low stellar‐mass galaxies are mostly blue in low‐density environments, but mostly red in high‐density environments, again irrespective of their morphology. While galaxies with early‐type morphology do always have higher red fractions, this is subdominant compared to the dependence of red fraction on stellar mass and environment. The colour–density relation is primarily driven by variations in colour fractions at fixed morphology, in particular the fraction of spiral galaxies that have red colours, and especially at low stellar masses. We demonstrate that our red spirals primarily include galaxies with true spiral morphology, and that they constitute an additional population to the S0 galaxies considered by previous studies. We clearly show there is an environmental dependence for colour beyond that for morphology. The environmental transformation of galaxies from blue to red must occur on significantly shorter time‐scales than the transformation from spiral to early‐type. We also present many of our results as functions of the distance to the nearest galaxy group. This confirms that the environmental trends we present are not specific to the manner in which environment is quantified, but nevertheless provides plain evidence for an environmental process at work in groups. However, the properties of group members show little dependence on the total mass of the group they inhabit, at least for group masses . Before using the Galaxy Zoo morphologies to produce the above results, we first quantify a luminosity‐, size‐ and redshift‐dependent classification bias that affects this data set, and probably most other studies of galaxy population morphology. A correction for this bias is derived and applied to produce a sample of galaxies with reliable morphological‐type likelihoods, on which we base our analysis.

How much a galaxy knows about its large-scale environment?: An information theoretic perspective

Galaxy Zoo: disentangling the environmental dependence of morphology and colour

Impact of Large-Scale Structure Formation on the Global Information Budget

Galaxy Zoo: the dependence of morphology and colour on environment

Denser Environments Cultivate Larger Galaxies: A Comprehensive Study beyond the Local Universe with 3 Million Hyper Suprime-Cam Galaxies

A Comprehensive Investigation of Environmental Influences on Galaxies in Group Environments

Connecting the Physical Properties of Galaxies with the Overdensity and Tidal Shear of the Large-Scale Environment

The Dependence of Galaxy Morphology and Structure on Environment and Stellar Mass

The effect of environment on the properties of the most massive galaxies at $0.5<z<2.5$ in the cosmos-dash field

Star formation efficiency across large-scale galactic environments

The Relation Between Galaxy Morphology and Environment in the Local Universe: An RC3-SDSS Picture

Red riding on hood: Exploring how galaxy colour depends on environment

The evolving relations between size, mass, surface density, and star formation in 3x10^4 galaxies since z=2

Do galaxy mergers prefer under-dense environments?

Galaxy ecology: groups and low-density environments in the SDSS and 2dFGRS

Large Scale Structures in COSMOS2020: Evolution of Star Formation Activity in Different Environments at 0.4 < z < 4

Large-scale Structures in COSMOS2020: Evolution of Star Formation Activity in Different Environments at 0.4 < z < 4

Dissect two-halo galactic conformity effect for central galaxies: The dependence of star formation activities on the large-scale environment