Abstract:We analyse the relationships between galaxy morphology, colour, environment and stellar mass using data for over 105 objects from Galaxy Zoo, the largest sample of visually classified morphologies yet compiled. We conclusively show that colour and morphology fractions are very different functions of environment. Both colour and morphology are sensitive to stellar mass. However, at fixed stellar mass, while colour is also highly sensitive to environment, morphology displays much weaker environmental trends. Only a small part of both the morphology–density and colour–density relations can be attributed to the variation in the stellar‐mass function with environment. Galaxies with high stellar masses are mostly red in all environments and irrespective of their morphology. Low stellar‐mass galaxies are mostly blue in low‐density environments, but mostly red in high‐density environments, again irrespective of their morphology. While galaxies with early‐type morphology do always have higher red fractions, this is subdominant compared to the dependence of red fraction on stellar mass and environment. The colour–density relation is primarily driven by variations in colour fractions at fixed morphology, in particular the fraction of spiral galaxies that have red colours, and especially at low stellar masses. We demonstrate that our red spirals primarily include galaxies with true spiral morphology, and that they constitute an additional population to the S0 galaxies considered by previous studies. We clearly show there is an environmental dependence for colour beyond that for morphology. The environmental transformation of galaxies from blue to red must occur on significantly shorter time‐scales than the transformation from spiral to early‐type. We also present many of our results as functions of the distance to the nearest galaxy group. This confirms that the environmental trends we present are not specific to the manner in which environment is quantified, but nevertheless provides plain evidence for an environmental process at work in groups. However, the properties of group members show little dependence on the total mass of the group they inhabit, at least for group masses . Before using the Galaxy Zoo morphologies to produce the above results, we first quantify a luminosity‐, size‐ and redshift‐dependent classification bias that affects this data set, and probably most other studies of galaxy population morphology. A correction for this bias is derived and applied to produce a sample of galaxies with reliable morphological‐type likelihoods, on which we base our analysis.

The Dependence of Galaxy Morphology and Structure on Environment and Stellar Mass

Galaxy Zoo: the dependence of morphology and colour on environment

The Relation Between Galaxy Morphology and Environment in the Local Universe: An RC3-SDSS Picture

Galaxy Zoo: disentangling the environmental dependence of morphology and colour

The evolving relations between size, mass, surface density, and star formation in 3x10^4 galaxies since z=2

The Dependence of Star Formation History and Internal Structure on Stellar Mass for 105Low-Redshift Galaxies

Galaxy Clusters from the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys. II. Environmental Effects on the Size–Mass Relation

The Mass Dependence of Structure, Star Formation Rate, and Mass Assembly Mode at 0.5 < Z < 2.5

Mass-Selection and the Evolution of the Morphology-Density Relation from z=0.8 to z=0

The Zcosmos Redshift Survey: the Role of Environment and Stellar Mass in Shaping the Rise of the Morphology-Density Relation from Z ~ 1

Galaxy Clusters from the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys.II. Environment effects on size-mass relation

The Dependence of Galaxy Properties on the Underlying 3D Matter Density Field at 2.0 < z < 2.5

Mass and Environment as Drivers of Galaxy Evolution III: The constancy of the faint-end slope and the merging of galaxies

A Multi-Wavelength Study of Low Redshift Cluster of Galaxies II. Environmental Impact on Galaxy Growth

Absence of Evidence Is Not Evidence of Absence: The Color-Density Relation at Fixed Stellar Mass Persists to z ~ 1

The effect of environment on the properties of the most massive galaxies at $0.5<z<2.5$ in the cosmos-dash field

The dependence of star formation history and internal structure on stellar mass for 10<sup>5</sup>low-redshift galaxies

Dependence of Galaxy Structure on Rest-frame Wavelength and Galaxy Type

Morphology and Structure of High-redshift Massive Galaxies in the CANDELS Fields

No evidence for a dependence of the mass size relation of early-type galaxies on environment in the local Universe

The Environmental Dependence of the Luminosity-Size Relation for Galaxies