A-142 Usefulness of Targeted RNAseq to Diagnosis of Patients with Suspected hypereosinophilic syndrome: Retrospective Analysis in a single hospital

J Park,J Kang,S Jeon,S Kee,E Na,M Shin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.140
IF: 12.114
2024-10-27
Clinical Chemistry
Abstract:Hypereosinophilia is defined as either a continuous concentration of 1.5×10 9 /L eosinophils in the blood for at least 1 month apart periods or at least 20% eosinophils on bone marrow biopsy. Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a group of blood disorders that occur when an individual has high numbers of eosinophils, and the excess eosinophils enter various tissues, eventually damaging body organs. HES is classified into primary HES, caused by myeloid neoplasms (MNs), and secondary HES, in which polyclonal expansion of eosinophils is induced by factors other than MNs. To diagnose HES, genetic tests, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, which can detect targeted fusion genes, should be accompanied by chromosomal karyotyping in bone marrow aspirates. Here, we aimed to analyze the results of several genetic tests performed for diagnosing hypereosinophilia, including targeted RNA-sequencing (RNAseq). We retrospectively analyzed the information of 68 patients with suspected HES who underwent bone marrow examination from 2018 to 2022. FISH panels for eosinophilia ( FIP1L1 / PDGFRA , PDGFRB , and FGFR1 rearrangement probes(Abbott)) and chromosomal karyotyping after bone marrow aspiration and biopsy were included. RNAseq was performed to identify fusion genes or genetic variants. Targeted RNAseq was obtained for 85 genes using the panel (KblueBio), and the data was analyzed using NGeneAnalysis (NGeneBio). Among the 68 patients analyzed, 30 patients (44%) were diagnosed with reactive hypereosinophilia as the final diagnosis. Secondary HES was diagnosed in 33 patients (50%), followed by 4 patients diagnosed with primary HES including myeloid neoplasms with gene rearrangement, and one AML patient. Chromosome karyotyping was performed in 66 patients (97%), and 61 (92%) had normal karyotypes. FISH analysis was performed in 46 patients (68%), and 41 (89%) had negative results. The remaining five patients had the following results; numerical abnormality of FIP1L1 / PDGFRA , numerical abnormality of PDGFRB , numerical abnormality of 11q23, positive for FGFR1 rearrangement, and positive for FIP1L1 / PDGFRA rearrangement. Targeted RNAseq was performed in 33 patients (49%), and significant gene rearrangements were observed in 4 patients (12%). TCF3 :: JAK2 fusion was found in the patient diagnosed with HES. FGFR1 :: CNTRL , FGFR1 :: SSBP2 , and FIP1L1 :: PDGFRA fusions were found in each patient diagnosed with myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase fusion genes. FGFR1 :: SSBP2 fusion was not observed in FISH but only in RNAseq. To work-up for hypereosinophilia, RNAseq is considered a complementary useful test to find a clonal abnormality that can be missed in existing tests such as chromosomal karyotyping and FISH.
medical laboratory technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?