Involvement of the JAK‐STAT pathway in the molecular landscape of tyrosine kinase fusion‐negative hypereosinophilic syndromes: A nationwide CEREO study
Matthieu Groh,Laurène Fenwarth,Mathilde Labro,Augustin Boudry,Elise Fournier,Mathieu Wemeau,Alice Marceau‐Renaut,Rafael Daltro de Oliveira,Julie Abraham,Marly Barry,Philippe Blanche,Quentin Bodard,Thorsten Braun,Safia Chebrek,Matthieu Decamp,Cécile‐Audrey Durel,Edouard Forcade,Mathieu Gerfaud‐Valentin,Camille Golfier,Clément Gourguechon,Nathalie Grardel,Olivier Kosmider,Nihal Martis,Sarah Melboucy Belkhir,Fatiha Merabet,Adrien Michon,Stéphane Moreau,Cécile Morice,Antoine Néel,Franck E. Nicolini,Laurent Pascal,Florence Pasquier,Andrea Pieragostini,Catherine Roche‐Lestienne,Philippe Rousselot,Louis Terriou,Anne Thiebaut‐Bertrand,Jean‐François Viallard,Claude Preudhomme,Jean‐Emmanuel Kahn,Guillaume Lefevre,Nicolas Duployez,CEREO Collaborators
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27306
IF: 13.265
2024-04-03
American Journal of Hematology
Abstract:Mutations of the JAK‐STAT pathway (JAK1, JAK2, STAT5B, STAT5A) are frequent (>50% of patients) in patients with tyrosine kinase fusion‐negative hypereosinophilic syndromes, and are amenable to JAK inhibition. We investigated using a custom NGS panel of 149 genes the mutational landscape of 64 consecutive adult patients with tyrosine kinase fusion‐negative hypereosinophilia (HE)/hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) harboring features suggestive of myeloid neoplasm. At least one mutation was reported in 50/64 (78%) patients (compared to 8/44 (18%) patients with idiopathic HE/HES/HEUS used as controls; p
hematology