Abstract:Research Question Disputes over the corporate governance impacts of common ownership continue. Differentiating from existing studies, we focus on the Chinese stock market, exploiting the Top 10 Shareholding File, which includes various investors besides institutional investors, to study the impact of common ownership built through blockholders on corporate risk‐taking behavior. Research Findings We find that firms with higher common ownership are less likely to engage in corporate risk‐taking, with concomitant decreases in future growth rates. Mechanism analysis shows that blockholders' common ownership exerts its influence through increasing market concentration, with concomitant lessening of market competition. Interestingly, further analyses indicate that, in contrast to blockholders, ownership connectedness built by mutual fund families significantly raises corporate risk‐taking along with growth. However, individual investors' common ownership does not show the significant statistical relationship with corporate risk‐taking. Theoretical Implications We add to the debate on common ownership on corporate governance. Consistent with the anti‐competition stream of literature, the risk‐taking‐reduction role we identify for blockholder common ownership supports the theory of anti‐competition. Our results highlight the need to consider the heterogeneity of common ownership. Policy Implications While blockholder common ownership is evidenced to have a negative effect on corporate risk‐taking, with, by extension, a negative impact on economic development, our results also suggest that efficient monitoring mitigates these effects. We also document an interesting heterogeneity in investor types. Mutual fund common ownership, in contrast to blockholder common ownership, is associated with higher risk‐taking and more robust firm growth. This suggests the positive role of institutions in corporate governance and the necessity of considering the heterogeneity of common ownership.

Firms and banks common ownership and firm organizational resilience

Shareholder heterogeneity, financing constraints, and organizational resilience: Mixed-ownership reform in Chinese private enterprises

The bright side of cross ownership: Evidence from the corporate resilience to COVID‐19 crisis in China

Does state ownership enhance corporate resilience? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic

Common ownership along supply chain and trade credit: Evidence from China

Residual state ownership, foreign ownership and firms' financing patterns

Does common institutional ownership restrain corporate financialization?

Ownership, Institutions, and Capital Structure: Evidence from China

Bank ownership and dynamic capital structure adjustment of firms: evidence from China<sup>*</sup>

Does Bank Ownership Increase Firm Value? Evidence from China

Collusion or governance? Common ownership and corporate risk‐taking

Asset Allocation and Bank Resilience: China Insights

Shareholdings in Financial Institutions, Financing Constraints, and Cash Reserves 1

Can common institutional ownership inhibit the formation of zombie firms? Evidence from China

The Impact Of Ownership Structure On Financial Risk Of Chinese Listed Companies

The impact of financial institutions' cross-shareholdings on risk-taking

Commercial Bank Ownership Structure and Risk Preference

Bank shareholder network and board governance: Evidence from Chinese commercial banks

Financial Institutions' Ownership and Firm Performance:From the Perspective of Shareholder Activism

Research on Bank Ownership of Firms：Regulation, Development and Literature

The financing behaviour of listed Chinese firms