Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate the completeness of conflict-of-interest self-reporting by ophthalmology researchers and to assess factors associated with self-reporting. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Participants: We evaluated articles published between January and June 2017 in Ophthalmology, JAMA Ophthalmology, the American Journal of Ophthalmology, and Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. To assess more accurately the cases in which an author published multiple articles, we defined a unit of analysis, authorship, for which each author of each article is a unique data point. To enable comparison with the Open Payments Database (OPD), we only included United States physician authorships. Methods: For each authorship, we defined self-reported relationships as the companies listed in the article's conflict-of-interest disclosures. Based on journal policies, we defined OPD-reported relationships as the list of companies that reported payments to the author within 36 months before submission. Main outcome measures: For each authorship, we assessed the proportion of OPD-reported relationships that were self-reported. The primary measurement was the proportion of authorships reporting none of their OPD-reported relationships. Results: Of the 660 total authorships (486 unique authors), 413 authorships (63%) reported none of their OPD-reported relationships, 112 (17%) reported some of them, 9 (1%) reported all of them, and 126 (19%) had 0 relationships. The proportion of authorships reporting none of their relationships did not differ significantly between journals that required reporting of all relationships compared with journals that required reporting only of relevant relationships (adjusted percentage, 61.4% vs. 64.3%; P = 0.46). Authorships with more dollars received during the reporting period showed higher rates of self-reporting (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Even among journals that required complete reporting, self-reporting was low compared with an industry-maintained database of financial relationships. Deficiencies in reporting may undermine confidence in self-reporting and may compromise the transparency that is needed to interpret research results fairly. Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Expressions of Concern in the Ophthalmological Literature

Readership awareness series – Paper 8: Research ethics and 'editorial expressions of concern'

Characteristics of retracted articles in ophthalmology

A Comparative Study on Characteristics of Retracted Publications Across Different Open Access Levels

An Analysis of Solicitations from Predatory Journals in Ophthalmology

Errors in Abstract, Methods, and Additional Contributions

Corrigendum: Characteristics of eye-related emergency visits and triage differences by nurses and ophthalmologists: perspective from a single eye center in southern China

Retraction Note: Autoantibodies detection in patients affected by autoimmune retinopathies

An analysis of retractions of papers authored by Scott Reuben, Joachim Boldt and Yoshitaka Fujii

Corneal and Ocular Surface Contributions From Mexico: A Bibliometric Analysis From 1913 to 2022

Epidemiology, Translation and Clinical Research of Ophthalmology

Self-reporting of Conflicts of Interest by Ophthalmology Researchers Compared with the Open Payments Database Industry Reports

Erratum: Single cell analysis of short-term dry eye induced changes in cornea immune cell populations

Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study

Retracted: Epidemiological Analysis and Prognosis of Conjunctival Cancer in the Past Twenty Years: A Population-Based Retrospective Study Using SEER Data

From Misdiagnosis to Management: A Case Report of Ocular Inflammatory Disease

Retracted: Effects of Calf Blood-Deproteinized Extract Ophthalmic Gel Combined with Sodium Hyaluronate Eye Drops on Conjunctival Hyperemia Score and Tear Film Stability in Patients with Dry Eye

Retracted: The Optos 200Tx Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Application in Retinoblastoma Patients’ Follow-Up

Ophthalmology-focused publications and findings on COVID-19: A systematic review

Retracted: Clinical Comparative Study of Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide and Aflibercept in the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Cystoid Macular Edema

Evolution and characterization of health sciences paper retractions in Brazil and Portugal