Techno‐economic and life cycle analysis of renewable natural gas derived from anaerobic digestion of grassy biomass: A US Corn Belt watershed case study

Olumide Olafasakin,Ellen M. Audia,Mark Mba‐Wright,John C. Tyndall,Lisa A. Schulte
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13164
2024-05-23
GCB Bioenergy
Abstract:Restoring native grasslands in agricultural watersheds can enhance ecosystem services and offer profitable routes for biomass use in renewable natural gas (RNG) production. Our study assessed the techno‐economic and life cycle impacts of converting grassy biomass to RNG via anaerobic digestion, observing RNG outputs between 0.12 and 45.04 million gigajoules. Economic viability, based on a net present value ranging from − 422 million, relies on environmental credits. RNG production from this pathway emits significantly lower CO2 compared to fossil fuels, meeting stringent EPA standards for cellulosic biofuels, and showcasing the sustainable potential and challenges of this approach. Restoring native grassland vegetation can substantially improve ecosystem service outcomes from agricultural watersheds, but profitable pathways are needed to incentivize conversion from conventional crops. Given growing demand for renewable energy, using grassy biomass to produce biofuels provides a potential solution. We assessed the techno‐economic feasibility and life cycle outcomes of a "grass‐to‐gas" pathway that includes harvesting grassy (lignocellulosic) biomass for renewable natural gas (RNG) production through anaerobic digestion (AD), expanding on previous research that quantified ecosystem service and landowner financial outcomes of simulated grassland restoration in the Grand River Basin of Iowa and Missouri, United States. We found that the amount of RNG produced through AD of grassy biomass ranged 0.12–45.04 million gigajoules (GJ), and the net present value (NPV) of the RNG ranged − 422 million, depending on the combination of land use, productivity, and environmental credit scenarios. Positive NPVs are achieved with environmental credits for replacement of synthetic agricultural inputs with digestate and clean fuel production (e.g., USEPA D3 Renewable Identification Number, California Low Carbon Fuel Standard). Producing RNG from grassy biomass emits 15.1 g CO2‐eq/MJ, which compares favorably to the fossil natural gas value of 61.1 g CO2‐eq/MJ and exceeds the US Environmental Protection Agency's requirement for cellulosic biofuel. Overall, this study demonstrates opportunities and limitations to using grassy biomass from restored grasslands for sustainable RNG production.
energy & fuels,agronomy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?