Abstract:Bioenergy with carbon capture and geological storage (BECCS) is a top option to both decrease CO2 emissions and remove CO2 currently in the atmosphere. BECCS requires that we can sustainably produce biomass without impacting the capacity for food and feed production. We modeled yield potential on U.S. marginal land for three promising perennial biomass crops: Miscanthus, switchgrass, and energycane. Under current (2000–2014) and forecasted future (2036–2050) conditions we optimized the spatial distribution of these three crops for yield potential. The predicted biomasses from these crops on marginal land are estimated to offset about 11% of the current U.S. CO2 emissions. Bioenergy with carbon capture and geological storage (BECCS) is considered one of the top options for both offsetting CO2 emissions and removing atmospheric CO2. BECCS requires using limited land resources efficiently while ensuring minimal adverse impacts on the delicate food‐energy‐water nexus. Perennial C4 biomass crops are productive on marginal land under low‐input conditions avoiding conflict with food and feed crops. The eastern half of the contiguous U.S. contains a large amount of marginal land, which is not economically viable for food production and liable to wind and water erosion under annual cultivation. However, this land is suitable for geological CO2 storage and perennial crop growth. Given the climate variation across the region, three perennials are major contenders for planting. The yield potential and stability of Miscanthus, switchgrass, and energycane across the region were compared to select which would perform best under the recent (2000–2014) and future (2036–2050) climates. Miscanthus performed best in the Midwest, switchgrass in the Northeast and energycane in the Southeast. On average, Miscanthus yield decreased from present 19.1 t/ha to future 16.8 t/ha; switchgrass yield from 3.5 to 2.4 t/ha; and energycane yield increased from 14 to 15 t/ha. Future yield stability decreased in the region with higher predicted drought stress. Combined, these crops could produce 0.6–0.62 billion tonnes biomass per year for the present and future. Using the biomass for power generation with CCS would capture 703–726 million tonnes of atmospheric CO2 per year, which would offset about 11% of current total U.S. emission. Further, this biomass approximates the net primary CO2 productivity of two times the current baseline productivity of existing vegetation, suggesting a huge potential for BECCS. Beyond BECCS, C4 perennial grasses could also increase soil carbon and provide biomass for emerging industries developing replacements for non‐renewable products including plastics and building materials.

Market Potential for CO$_2$ Removal and Sequestration from Renewable Natural Gas Production in California

Economic Modeling of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Projects Utilizing Re-Purposed Onshore California Wells and Infrastructure

GIS‐enabled Biomass‐ethanol Supply Chain Optimization: Model Development and Miscanthus Application

A Methodology for Fueling Mobility Markets with Hydrogen from Natural Gas plus Carbon Capture and Sequestration

Power to Gas: an Option for 2060 High Penetration Rate of Renewable Energy Scenario of China

Large-scale spatially explicit analysis of carbon capture at cellulosic biorefineries

Exploring the role of natural gas power plants with carbon capture and storage as a bridge to a low-carbon future

Collaborative Optimization for a Multi-Energy System Considering Carbon Capture System and Power to Gas Technology

Techno‐economic and life cycle analysis of renewable natural gas derived from anaerobic digestion of grassy biomass: A US Corn Belt watershed case study

A Market Framework to Exploit the Multi-Energy Operating Reserve of Smart Energy Hubs in the Integrated Electricity-Gas Systems

Assessing Best Practices in Natural Gas Production and Emerging CO 2 Capture Techniques to Minimize the Carbon Footprint of Electricity Generation

Global biomethane and carbon dioxide removal potential through anaerobic digestion of waste biomass

Biomass yield potential on U.S. marginal land and its contribution to reach net‐zero emission

A bottom-up regional potential assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in Germany

Spatially explicit analysis identifies significant potential for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in China

Evaluating the Use of BECCS and Afforestation under China’s Carbon-Neutral Target for 2060

Capacity of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage in China Consistent with the Global Remaining Carbon Budget

Natural climate solutions provide robust carbon mitigation capacity under future climate change scenarios

Optimal Planning for Regional Carbon Capture and Storage Systems under Uncertainty

Climate vs Energy Security: Quantifying the Trade-offs of BECCS Deployment and Overcoming Opportunity Costs on Set-Aside Land

Economic and environmental evaluation of coal-and-biomass-to-liquids-and-electricity plants equipped with carbon capture and storage