Abstract:Paulo Cruchinho, 1 María Dolores López-Franco, 2 Manuel Luís Capelas, 3 Sofia Almeida, 4 Phillippa May Bennett, 5– 7 Marcelle Miranda da Silva, 1, 8 Gisela Teixeira, 1 Elisabete Nunes, 1 Pedro Lucas, 1 Filomena Gaspar 1 On Behalf of the Handovers4SafeCare 1 Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Center (CIDNUR) of Lisbon, Nursing School of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; 2 CTS-464 Nursing and Innovation in Healthcare, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain; 3 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Lisboa, Portugal; 4 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Porto, Portugal; 5 Center for English, Translation, and Anglo-Portuguese Studies (CETAPS), Lisboa, Portugal; 6 Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities of the New University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; 7 Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Coimbra, Department of Languages, Literatures and Cultures, Coimbra, Portugal; 8 Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Anna Nery Nursing School, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Correspondence: Paulo Cruchinho, Nursing School of Lisbon, Avenida Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1600-190, Portugal, Tel +351 217913400, Email Cross-cultural validation of self-reported measurement instruments for research is a long and complex process, which involves specific risks of bias that could affect the research process and results. Furthermore, it requires researchers to have a wide range of technical knowledge about the translation, adaptation and pre-test aspects, their purposes and options, about the different psychometric properties, and the required evidence for their assessment and knowledge about the quantitative data processing and analysis using statistical software. This article aimed: 1) identify all guidelines and recommendations for translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation within the healthcare sciences; 2) describe the methodological approaches established in these guidelines for conducting translation, adaptation, and cross-cultural validation; and 3) provide a practical guideline featuring various methodological options for novice researchers involved in translating, adapting, and validating measurement instruments. Forty-two guidelines on translation, adaptation, or cross-cultural validation of measurement instruments were obtained from "CINAHL with Full Text" (via EBSCO) and "MEDLINE with Full Text". A content analysis was conducted to identify the similarities and differences in the methodological approaches recommended. Bases on these similarities and differences, we proposed an eight-step guideline that includes: a) forward translation; 2) synthesis of translations; 3) back translation; 4) harmonization; 5) pre-testing; 6) field testing; 7) psychometric validation, and 8) analysis of psychometric properties. It is a practical guideline because it provides extensive and comprehensive information on the methodological approaches available to researchers. This is the first methodological literature review carried out in the healthcare sciences regarding the methodological approaches recommended by existing guidelines. Keywords: cross-cultural comparison, decision-making, psychometric properties, research design, validation studies, health services research Healthcare research requires the use of cross-culturally validated instruments to measure implementation of healthcare interventions and their outcomes through quantitative comparisons over time and across organizations. 1–4 The use of data obtained through culturally adapted evaluation instruments allows researchers, policymakers, managers and, health professionals to gain a more analytical view of the phenomena under study and to develop internationally accepted and recognized theories on the provision of patient care, based on the comparison of local data with broader data. 5 This approach also facilitates the identification of factors contributing to the effectiveness of healthcare intervention programs, 6 or other forms of Outcomes Research. This type of quantitative research, focused on the quality of healthcare provision, requires valid and reliable measuring instruments, 7 obtained through cross-cultural validation studies. These studies aim to confirm the capacity of measurement instruments developed in one culture to produce meaningful results when applied in another culture. 8 Measurement instruments can include questionnaires, tests, rating scales and self-reports, 9 the latter being also known as Patient-Reporte -Abstract Truncated-

Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations

Translation and Validation of the Arrhythmia-Specific Questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia (ASTA) to the Brazilian Context: An Instrument Focusing on Arrhythmia Symptoms

The process and challenges of language translation and cultural adaptation of study instruments: a case study from the NIDA CTN CHOICES-2 trial

Translation and cultural adaptation of research instruments – guidelines and challenges: an example in FAMCARE-2 for use in Sweden

Translation and Adaption of Questionnaires: A Nursing Challenge

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Measurement Instruments: A Practical Guideline for Novice Researchers

Norwegian translation, cultural adaption and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory – Staff (PCPI-S)

Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Assessment Instruments Used in Psychological Research With Children and Families

Understanding the Social Dimensions and Context in HIV Research: Instrument Adaptation Is More Than Just Translation

A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus

Cross-culturally adapting the GHQ-12 for use with refugee populations: Opportunities, dilemmas, and challenges

Translation, cross-cultural adaption and measurement properties of the evidence-based practice profile

Pragmatic adaptation of implementation research measures for a novel context and multiple professional roles: a factor analysis study

Examining and establishing translational and conceptual equivalence of survey questionnaires for a multi-ethnic, multi-language study

Cultural adaptation and validation of the Attribution Questionnaire for stigma towards disability pension applicants for use among psychiatrists and general practitioners in Sweden

Cross-cultural adaptation of an anxiety measure in a disadvantaged South African community context: Methodological processes and findings

Methodological implications of adapting and applying a web-based questionnaire on health problems to adolescent football players

The significance of exploring conceptual equivalence within the process of the cross-cultural adaptation of tools: The case of the Patient's Perception of Feeling Known by their Nurses Scale

The patient experience with treatment and self-management (PETS) questionnaire: translation and cultural adaption of the Norwegian version

The Professional Nurse Self‐Assessment Scale II – Translation and cultural adaptation for Nordic countries

Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: A Methodological Systematic Review