Abstract:Paulo Cruchinho, 1 María Dolores López-Franco, 2 Manuel Luís Capelas, 3 Sofia Almeida, 4 Phillippa May Bennett, 5– 7 Marcelle Miranda da Silva, 1, 8 Gisela Teixeira, 1 Elisabete Nunes, 1 Pedro Lucas, 1 Filomena Gaspar 1 On Behalf of the Handovers4SafeCare 1 Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Center (CIDNUR) of Lisbon, Nursing School of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; 2 CTS-464 Nursing and Innovation in Healthcare, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain; 3 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Lisboa, Portugal; 4 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Porto, Portugal; 5 Center for English, Translation, and Anglo-Portuguese Studies (CETAPS), Lisboa, Portugal; 6 Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities of the New University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; 7 Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Coimbra, Department of Languages, Literatures and Cultures, Coimbra, Portugal; 8 Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Anna Nery Nursing School, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Correspondence: Paulo Cruchinho, Nursing School of Lisbon, Avenida Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1600-190, Portugal, Tel +351 217913400, Email Cross-cultural validation of self-reported measurement instruments for research is a long and complex process, which involves specific risks of bias that could affect the research process and results. Furthermore, it requires researchers to have a wide range of technical knowledge about the translation, adaptation and pre-test aspects, their purposes and options, about the different psychometric properties, and the required evidence for their assessment and knowledge about the quantitative data processing and analysis using statistical software. This article aimed: 1) identify all guidelines and recommendations for translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation within the healthcare sciences; 2) describe the methodological approaches established in these guidelines for conducting translation, adaptation, and cross-cultural validation; and 3) provide a practical guideline featuring various methodological options for novice researchers involved in translating, adapting, and validating measurement instruments. Forty-two guidelines on translation, adaptation, or cross-cultural validation of measurement instruments were obtained from "CINAHL with Full Text" (via EBSCO) and "MEDLINE with Full Text". A content analysis was conducted to identify the similarities and differences in the methodological approaches recommended. Bases on these similarities and differences, we proposed an eight-step guideline that includes: a) forward translation; 2) synthesis of translations; 3) back translation; 4) harmonization; 5) pre-testing; 6) field testing; 7) psychometric validation, and 8) analysis of psychometric properties. It is a practical guideline because it provides extensive and comprehensive information on the methodological approaches available to researchers. This is the first methodological literature review carried out in the healthcare sciences regarding the methodological approaches recommended by existing guidelines. Keywords: cross-cultural comparison, decision-making, psychometric properties, research design, validation studies, health services research Healthcare research requires the use of cross-culturally validated instruments to measure implementation of healthcare interventions and their outcomes through quantitative comparisons over time and across organizations. 1–4 The use of data obtained through culturally adapted evaluation instruments allows researchers, policymakers, managers and, health professionals to gain a more analytical view of the phenomena under study and to develop internationally accepted and recognized theories on the provision of patient care, based on the comparison of local data with broader data. 5 This approach also facilitates the identification of factors contributing to the effectiveness of healthcare intervention programs, 6 or other forms of Outcomes Research. This type of quantitative research, focused on the quality of healthcare provision, requires valid and reliable measuring instruments, 7 obtained through cross-cultural validation studies. These studies aim to confirm the capacity of measurement instruments developed in one culture to produce meaningful results when applied in another culture. 8 Measurement instruments can include questionnaires, tests, rating scales and self-reports, 9 the latter being also known as Patient-Reporte -Abstract Truncated-

The Professional Nurse Self‐Assessment Scale II – Translation and cultural adaptation for Nordic countries

Translation, cross-cultural adaption and measurement properties of the evidence-based practice profile

Norwegian translation, cultural adaption and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory – Staff (PCPI-S)

Adaptation and validation of the evidence-based practice profile (EBP2) questionnaire in a Norwegian primary healthcare setting

Translation and cultural adaptation of research instruments – guidelines and challenges: an example in FAMCARE-2 for use in Sweden

Dual use of instruments for assessing nursing students professional- and clinical competence

Translation and Adaption of Questionnaires: A Nursing Challenge

Translation of the updated clinical frailty scale 2.0 into Danish and implications for cross-sectoral reliability

The safety attitudes questionnaire – ambulatory version: psychometric properties of the Norwegian translated version for the primary care setting

Translation and cultural adaption of the emergency department-consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (ED CAPHS)-A questionnaire to measure patient experience in Denmark

The patient experience with treatment and self-management (PETS) questionnaire: translation and cultural adaption of the Norwegian version

Swedish translation and cultural adaptation of the scored Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG‐SGA©)—A validated tool for screening and assessing malnutrition in clinical practice and research

Measuring nursing competence: development of a self-assessment tool for general nurses across Europe

Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Nurse Self-Concept Questionnaire (NSCQ) for Portuguese nursing students

Self-reported competence among advanced practice nursing students in Denmark, Finland and Norway: a cross-sectional multicentre study

Measuring Professional Governance: The Swedish Version of the Verran Professional Governance Scale©

Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations

Translation and validation of the traditional Chinese NLN educational practices questionnaire, simulation design scale and student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning

Translation and focus group testing of the WHOQOL spirituality, religiousness, and personal beliefs module in Norway

Psychometric properties and criterion related validity of the Norwegian version of hospital survey on patient safety culture 2.0

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Measurement Instruments: A Practical Guideline for Novice Researchers