Abstract:Background: Today, scientists and academic researchers experience an enormous pressure to publish innovative and ground-breaking results in prestigious journals. This pressure may blight the general view concept of how scientific research needs to be done in terms of the general rules of transparency; duplication of data, and co-authorship rights might be compromised. As such, misconduct acts may occur more frequently than foreseen, as frequently these experiences are not openly shared or discussed among researchers. Main body: While there are some concerns about the health and the transparency implications of such normalised pressure practices imposed on researchers in scientific research, there is a general acceptance that researchers must take and accept it in order to survive in the competitive world of science. This is even more the case for junior and mid-senior researchers who have recently started their adventure into the universe of independent researchers. Only the slightest fraction manages to endure, after many years of furious and cruel rivalry, to obtain a long-term, and even less probable, permanent position. There is an evil circle; excellent records of good publications are needed in order to obtain research funding, but how to produce pioneering research during these first years without funding? Many may argue this is a necessary process to ensure good quality scientific investigation, possibly, but perseverance and resilience may not be the only values needed when rejection is received consecutively for years. Conclusion: There is a general culture that scientists rarely share previous bad experiences, in particular if they were associated to misconduct, as they may not be seen or considered as a relevant or hot topic to the scientific community readers. On next, a recent misconduct experience is shared, and a few additional reflections and suggestions on this topic were drafted in the hope other researchers might be spared unnecessary and unpleasant times.

A devastating blow: personal reflections on Argentina's scientific decline

Daily briefing: ‘Despair’ as Argentinian president begins dismantling science

'Despair': Argentinian researchers protest as president begins dismantling science

'Hopeless, burnt out, sad': how political change is impacting female researchers in Latin America

Strong medicine for Argentina's beleaguered science

The reality of scientific research in Latin America; an insider’s perspective

'Afraid to talk': researchers fear the end for science in Venezuela

COVID-19 will shape Argentine debt and poverty plans

Fragile science

Exploring COVID-19 research credibility among Spanish scientists

[Asymmetries between national articulation and the autonomy of state governments in implementing health technologies to fight COVID-19 in Argentina]

Cuts to postgraduate funding threaten Brazilian science — again

Astrophysics as a Service: Turning radio astronomy as an opportunity to impact society and businesses

Deceiving scientific research, misconduct events are possibly a more common practice than foreseen

The effectiveness of tax incentives for R&D+i in developing countries: The case of Argentina

QUALIS: The journal ranking system undermining the impact of Brazilian science

Astronomy in Argentina

Argentina debt deal hangs in balance amid COVID-19

Trends in Cuban research output: publications and patents

Mitigating losses: how scientific organisations can help address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on early-career researchers

Determinants of undervaccination of routine childhood immunization in Argentina: A cross-sectional study