Socio-economic conditions affect health-related quality of life, during recovery from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection : Results from the VASCO study (VAriabili Socioeconomiche e COVID-19), on the "Surviving-COVID" cohort, from Bergamo (Italy)
Simone Vasilij Benatti,Serena Venturelli,Roberto Buzzetti,Francesca Binda,Luca Belotti,Laura Soavi,Ave Maria Biffi,Maria Simonetta Spada,Monica Casati,Marco Rizzi,SURVIVING COVID study group,Maria Grazia Alessio,Chiara Ambaglio,Tiziano Barbui,Pietro Andrea Bonaffini,Emi Bondi,Giorgia Camera,Greta Carioli,Alessandra Carobbio,Simonetta Cesa,Caterina Conti,Roberto Cosentini,Giacomo Crotti,Anna Falanga,Simonetta Gerevini,Arianna Ghirardi,Andrea Giammarresi,Giuseppe Greco,Gianluca Imeri,Marina Marchetti,Claudia Marinaro,Aicha Ouabou,Ramona Pellegrini,Giulia Previtali,Giampaolo Quinzan,Alessandro Rossini,Michela Seghezzi,Maria Sessa,Roberta Severgnini,Claudia Suardi,Adriana Zanoletti,Alberto Zucchi,Gianluca Zuglian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09502-x
2024-08-12
Abstract:Background: Recovery from acute COVID-19 may be slow and incomplete: cases of Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID (PASC) are counted in millions, worldwide. We aimed to explore if and how the pre-existing Socio-economic-status (SES) influences such recovery. Methods: We analyzed a database of 1536 consecutive patients from the first wave of COVID-19 in Italy (February-September 2020), previously admitted to our referral hospital, and followed-up in a dedicated multidisciplinary intervention. We excluded those seen earlier than 12 weeks (the conventional limit for a possible PASC syndrome), and those reporting a serious complication from the acute phase (possibly accounting for symptoms persistence). We studied whether the exposition to disadvantaged SES (estimated through the Italian Institute of Statistics's model - ISTAT 2017) was affecting recovery outcomes, that is: symptoms (composite endpoint, i.e. at least one among: dyspnea, fatigue, myalgia, chest pain or palpitations); Health-Related-Quality-of-Life (HRQoL, as by SF-36 scale); post-traumatic-stress-disorder (as by IES-R scale); and lung structural damage (as by impaired CO diffusion, DLCO). Results: Eight-hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the analysis (median age 59 years; IQR: 50-69 years, 60.2% men), of which 499 (60.5%) were previously admitted to hospital and 27 (3.3%) to Intensive-Care Unit (ICU). Those still complaining of symptoms at follow-up were 337 (40.9%; 95%CI 37.5-42.2%), and 256 had a possible Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (31%, 95%CI 28.7-35.1%). DLCO was reduced in 147 (19.6%, 95%CI 17.0-22.7%). In a multivariable model, disadvantaged SES was associated with a lower HRQoL, especially for items exploring physical health (Limitations in physical activities: OR = 0.65; 95%CI = 0.47 to 0.89; p = 0.008; AUC = 0.74) and Bodily pain (OR = 0.57; 95%CI = 0.40 to 0.82; p = 0.002; AUC = 0.74). We did not observe any association between SES and the other outcomes. Conclusions: Recovery after COVID-19 appears to be independently affected by a pre-existent socio-economic disadvantage, and clinical assessment should incorporate SES and HRQoL measurements, along with symptoms. The socioeconomic determinants of SARS-CoV-2 disease are not exclusive of the acute infection: this finding deserves further research and specific interventions.