Psychological intervention improves quality of life in patients with early-stage cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Sára Anna Bognár,Brigitta Teutsch,Stefania Bunduc,Dániel Sándor Veres,Bence Szabó,Beatrix Fogarasi,Olga Júlia Zahariev,Nóra Vörhendi,Omer Almog,Yael Hadani,Dorottya Gergő,Emese Mihály,Bálint Erőss,Stefania Bunduc,Katalin Márta,Péter Hegyi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63431-y

IF: 4.6

2024-06-11

Scientific Reports

Abstract:The effectiveness of psychological interventions (PI) for malignant diseases is controversial. We aimed to investigate the effect of PI on survival and quality of life (QoL) in patients with cancer. We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases to identify randomized controlled trials comparing PI to standard care (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021282327). Outcomes were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and different domains of QoL. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the provider-, type-, environment-, duration of intervention; cancer stage, and type. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. The OS and RFS did not differ significantly between the two groups (OS:HR = 0.97; CI 0.87–1.08; RFS:HR = 0.99; CI 0.84–1.16). However, there was significant improvement in the intervention group in all the analyzed domains of QoL; in the global (SMD = 0.65; CI 0.35–0.94), emotional (SMD = 0.64; CI 0.33–0.95), social (SMD = 0.32; CI 0.13–0.51) and physical (SMD = 0.33; CI 0.05–0.60) domains. The effect of PI on QoL was generally positive immediately, 12 and 24 weeks after intervention, but the effect decreased over time and was no longer found significant at 48 weeks. The results were better in the breast cancer group and early stages of cancer. PIs do not prolong survival, but they significantly improve the QoL of cancer patients. PI should be added as standard of care 3–4 times a year, at least for patients with early-stage cancer.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the impact of psychological intervention (PI) on the survival rate and quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. Specifically, through systematic review and meta - analysis, the researchers aimed to answer the following key questions:

1. **Can psychological intervention improve the survival rate of cancer patients?**
- The research results show that psychological intervention has no significant impact on overall survival (OS) and recurrence - free survival (RFS). The specific data are as follows:
\[
\text{OS: HR} = 0.97, \text{95% CI} = 0.87–1.08
\]
\[
\text{RFS: HR} = 0.99, \text{95% CI} = 0.84–1.16
\]

2. **Can psychological intervention improve the quality of life of cancer patients?**
- The study found that psychological intervention significantly improved patients' experiences in multiple quality - of - life areas, including overall quality of life, emotional quality of life, social quality of life, and physical quality of life. The specific standardized mean differences (SMD) and their confidence intervals are as follows:
\[
\text{Overall quality of life: SMD} = 0.65, \text{95% CI} = 0.35–0.94
\]
\[
\text{Emotional quality of life: SMD} = 0.64, \text{95% CI} = 0.33–0.95
\]
\[
\text{Social quality of life: SMD} = 0.32, \text{95% CI} = 0.13–0.51
\]
\[
\text{Physical quality of life: SMD} = 0.33, \text{95% CI} = 0.05–0.60
\]

3. **Does the effect of psychological intervention change over time?**
- The study found that the effect of psychological intervention was positive immediately after the intervention, at 12 weeks and 24 weeks, but gradually weakened over time and was no longer significant at 48 weeks.

4. **Are there differences in the responses of different types of cancer patients to psychological intervention?**
- The results show that breast cancer patients benefit the most from psychological intervention, while no significant improvement was observed in prostate cancer patients. In addition, cancer patients in the early stage benefit more from psychological intervention.

In conclusion, the main purpose of this paper is to evaluate the specific impact of psychological intervention on the survival rate and quality of life of cancer patients through systematic review and meta - analysis, and to explore the performance of these impacts in different subgroups. The research results indicate that although psychological intervention cannot prolong the survival time of cancer patients, it can significantly improve their quality of life, especially in emotional, social and physical aspects. Therefore, the study recommends that psychological intervention be made part of standard care, especially for early - stage cancer patients.