Abstract:The gold standard of arterial stiffness determination is measurement of the carotide-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV). It was suggested that 24 hour measurement might give addition or more insights in the estimation of the global cardiovascular (CV) risk Our aim was to analyze association/concordance between cf-PWV values (SphygmoCor) with the values obtained with 24h measurments (Mobil-o-Graph and Arteriograph). This study included 154 patients with the primary hypertension (women 69.5%, mean age 38.5). In all of them we collected various clinical and laboratory data and antroplogical paramaters. Parameters of arterial stiffness were measured with the SphygmoCor and 24h using Mobil-o-Graph and Arteriograph devices during the regular working day. Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated. the Bland Altman method was used to estimate the deviation of methods Limits of agreement (LoA) are defined as the mean difference ± 1.96 SD difference. Statistically significant correlation was observed between cf-PWV and data obtained with Arteriograph: 24h, day, night; and Mobilograph: 24h, day and night (r = 0.500, p < 0.001; r = 0.485, p < 0.001; r = 0.519, p < 0.001); r = 0.697, p < 0.001, r = 0.691, p < 0.001) r = 0.665, p < 0.001, respectively). cf-PWV shared 25% and 49% of the variance (R2) with the Arteriograph and Mobilograph, respectively. CCC was weak for both methods, Arteriograph and Mobilograph (CCC 0.49 95%CI 0.36-0.60; 0.50 95% CI 0.41-0.58, respectively). Large difference was observed for both methods, being larher for Arteriograph than with Mobilograph (-0.31 m/s (LoA -4.8 to 4.8) ; 1.6 m/s (LoA -1.69 to 4.89, respectively). In the group of young treated hypertensive patients with mild CV risk we found week agreement between cf-PWV and 24h PWV data. Better concordance was found between cf-PWV and Mobilograph than with Arteriograph. It could be concluded that cf-PWV and 24h PWV could not be used intercheangable. More results are needed to answer whether 24 h PWV has the same clinical value as cf-PWV

Different Methods for Measurements and Estimation of Pulse Wave Velocity are not Interchangeable

POOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN CAROTID-FEMORAL PULSE WAVE VELOCITY (C-F PWV) AND 24 HOUR PWV DETERMINED WITH TWO DIFFERENT METHODS

O66 CONCORDANCE BETWEEN THE PULSE WAVE VELOCITY ESTIMATED WITH TOTAL ARTERIAL COMPLIANCE AND CAROTID-FEMORAL PULSE WAVE VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS

Non-Invasive Methods for PWV Measurement in Blood Vessel Stiffness Assessment

Concordance among pulse wave velocity assessment methods: A network meta-analysis

Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement in Healthy and Diseased Carotid Arteries in Vivo

Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in the General Population

Reproducibility of Pulse Wave Measurement

Novel Methods for Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement

Pulse Wave Velocity: Methodology, Clinical Applications, and Interplay with Heart Rate Variability

Clinical Validation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement Using a Multi-Beam Laser Vibrometer: The CARDIS Study

Estimated pulse wave velocity as a measure of vascular aging

Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Measured by Pulse Wave Imaging (pwi): A Comparison with Applanation Tonometry

Crucial importance of using a sliding calliper to measure distance for carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity assessment

Carotid Pulse Wave Analysis: Future Direction of Hemodynamic and Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Improving the accuracy and robustness of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measurement using a simplified tube-load model

Arterial stiffness assessment by pulse wave velocity in postmenopausal women: comparison between noninvasive devices

Estimation of central pulse wave velocity from radial pulse wave analysis

2024 Recommendations for Validation of Noninvasive Arterial Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement Devices

Arterial Stiffness Estimation in Hypertension

Simultaneous Measurement of Local Pulse Wave Velocities in Radial Arteries Using a Soft Sensor Based on the Fiber Bragg Grating Technique