Abstract:The ability of a host plant to act as a substrate or media for larval development may depend on how good it is at offering suitable nutrients for bacterial growth. In this study, we hypothesized that the suitability of a fruit type for fruit fly larval development is positively correlated with the ability of that fruit to act as a substrate/media for fruit fly symbiotic bacterial growth. We allowed a single female fruit fly to lay eggs on five different host fruits, then we monitored the larval development parameters across five generations and analyzed the bacterial community structure of larvae developing in 2 of these hosts (apple and banana) at the first and fifth generations. Results indicate that the larval length and dry weight did not vary significantly across experimental generations, but were greatly affected by fruit types and larval stages. The larval development time was extended considerably in apple and tomato but shortened in banana and mango. There was a significant shift in bacterial community structure and composition across fruits and generations. The bacterial community of larvae within the same fruit (apple and banana) clustered and was similar to the parental female (with the predominance of Proteobacteria), but there was a shift at the fifth generation (dominance of Firmicutes). Banana offered a suitable better development and growth to larvae and bacteria, respectively, compared to apple in which reduced larval development and bacterial growth were recorded. Although additional experiments are needed to adequately show that the differences in microbiome seen in fruit fly larval guts are the actual driver of different developmental outcomes of larvae on the different fruits, at the very least, our study has provided intriguing data suggesting interaction between the diets and gut microbial communities on insect development.Importance and Significance of the study Tephritid fruit flies entertain complex interactions with gut bacteria. These bacteria are known to provide nutritional benefits to their hosts, by supplementing missing nutrients from the host diets and regulating energy balance. Foraging for food is a risky exercise for the insect which is exposed to ecological adversities, including predators. Therefore, making beneficial choice among available food substrates is a question of survival for the flies and bacteria as well. Our study demonstrates interactions between the host fly and its intestinal bacteria in sustaining the larval development while foraging optimally on different fruit types. These findings add a novel step into our understanding of the interactions between the gut microbial communities and B. dorsalis and provide avenues for developing control strategies to limit the devastative incidence of the fly.

Fruit Flies as Potential Vectors of Foodborne Illness

Mediterranean Fruit Fly as a Potential Vector of Bacterial Pathogens

Bringing back the fruit into fruit fly–bacteria interactions

Special Collection: Filth Fly–Microbe Interactions Filth Fly Transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica to Lettuce, Lactuca sativa

Transfer of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to Spinach by House Flies, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae)

Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Fresh-Cut Apple Tissue and Its Potential for Transmission by Fruit Flies

Detection of Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens from Individual Filth Flies

Filth Fly Transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica to Lettuce, Lactuca sativa

Ingested Salmonella enterica, Cronobacter sakazakii, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes: transmission dynamics from adult house flies to their eggs and first filial (F1) generation adults

Insects as vectors of foodborne pathogenic bacteria

Role of Fly Cleaning Behavior on Carriage of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Flies as Vectors of Microorganisms Potentially Inducing Severe Diseases in Humans and Animals

Prevalence of Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli in House Flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in an Urban Environment

Tephritidae fruit fly gut microbiome diversity, function and potential for applications

Flies as a potential vector of selected alert pathogens in a hospital environment

Host Fruit As a Suitable Bacteria Growth Substrate That Promotes Larval Development of Bactrocera Dorsalis (diptera: Tephritidae)

Can Escherichia coli fly? The role of flies as transmitters of E. coli to food in an urban slum in Bangladesh

Flourishing in Filth: House Fly–Microbe Interactions Across Life History

Houseflies: not simple mechanical vectors of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Pest Flies Captured in Leafy Greens Plots Grown Near a Beef Cattle Feedlot.

Factors Affecting the Transmission of Salmonella by Flies: Natural Resistance to Colonization and Bacterial Interference