Abstract:General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—the European Union’s data protection regulation—has two key principles. It recognizes that individuals own and control their personal (but not contractual) data in perpetuity, leading to three critical privacy rights, namely, the rights to (i) explicit consent (data opt-in), (ii) to be forgotten (data erasure), and (iii) portability (data transfer). It also includes data security mandates against privacy breaches through unauthorized access. We study GDPR’s equilibrium impact by including these features in a dynamic two-period model of forward-looking firms and consumers. Firms collect consumer data for personalization and price discrimination. Consumers trade off gains from personalization relative to potential losses from privacy breaches and price discrimination in their purchase, data opt-in, erasure, and transfer decisions. Though data security mandates impose fines on firms for privacy breaches, firms can benefit from higher opt-in given lower breach risk. Surprisingly, data security mandates can hurt consumers. The effect of privacy rights is nuanced. Since the right to opt in separates goods exchange from the provision of personal data, it prevents market failure under high breach risk. But it also reduces consumer opt-in and personal data availability. Erasure and portability rights reduce consumers’ hold-up concerns by disciplining firms to provide ongoing value by limiting price discrimination and not slacking off on data security; but they also reduce the incentive to offer lower initial prices that encourages opt-in. Overall, privacy rights always benefit consumers in competitive markets, but they can surprisingly hurt consumers under monopoly, as monopolists have less incentives to subsidize consumer opt-in. They raise (reduce) firm profit and social welfare when breach risk is high (low). Finally, privacy rights increase firm profit most at moderate levels of data transferability. This paper was accepted by Dmitri Kuksov, marketing. Funding: T. T. Ke acknowledges financial support from the General Research Fund of the Hong Kong Research Grants Council [Grant 14500421]. Supplemental Material: The e-companion is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4614 .

Privacy and personal data collection with information externalities

Privacy and Personal Data Collection with Information Externalities

Data Privacy: from Transparency to Fairness

Enhanced User Data Privacy with Pay-by-data Model

Privacy Rights and Data Security: GDPR and Personal Data Markets

Privacy Risks of Social Interaction Structure: Network Learning in Quadratic Games

Optimized, Direct Sale of Privacy in Personal-Data Marketplaces

The Effects of Personal Data Management on Competition and Welfare

Consumer Privacy in Oligopolistic Markets: Winners, Losers, and Welfare

The Strange Case of Privacy in Equilibrium Models

Consumer Data Collection Strategies in Two-Sided Platforms: The Role of Data Ownership Assignment and Privacy Concerns

Contract-Based Private Data Collecting

Privacy or Utility in Data Collection? A Contract Theoretic Approach

A vision for global privacy bridges: Technical and legal measures for international data markets

Digital firm regulation strategy with privacy data protection costs

Unpacking privacy: Valuation of personal data protection

The Notice-and-Choice Privacy Gamble: Game Theory, Consumer Agency, and Implications for GDPR

The Value of Privacy: Strategic Data Subjects, Incentive Mechanisms and Fundamental Limits

Big data privacy: The datafication of personal information

Privacy regulations and economic efficiency: a dynamic perspective

Personal Data Gentrification