Oil-based or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women
Kim Dreyer, Joukje Van Rijswijk, Velja Mijatovic, Mariëtte Goddijn, Harold R Verhoeve, Ilse AJ Van Rooij, Annemieke Hoek, Petra Bourdrez, Annemiek W Nap, Henrike GM Rijnsaardt-Lukassen, Catharina CM Timmerman, Mesrure Kaplan, Angelo B Hooker, Anna P Gijsen, Ron Van Golde, Cathelijne F Van Heteren, Alexander V Sluijmer, Jan-Peter De Bruin, Jesper MJ Smeenk, Jacoba AM De Boer, Eduard Scheenjes, Annette EJ Duijn, Alexander Mozes, Marie J Pelinck, Maaike AF Traas, Machiel HA Van Hooff, Gijsbertus A Van Unnik, Cornelia H De Koning, Nan Van Geloven, Jos WR Twisk, Peter GA Hompes, Ben WJ Mol
2017-05-25
Abstract:BackgroundPregnancy rates among infertile women have been reported to increase after hysterosalpingography, but it is unclear whether the type of contrast medium used (oil-based or water-soluble contrast) influences this potential therapeutic effect. MethodsWe performed a multicenter, randomized trial in 27 hospitals in the Netherlands in which infertile women who were undergoing hysterosalpingography were randomly assigned to undergo this procedure with the use of oil-based or water-based contrast. Subsequently, couples received expectant management or the women underwent intrauterine insemination. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy within 6 months after randomization. Outcomes were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. ResultsA total of 1119 women were randomly assigned to hysterosalpingography with oil contrast (557 women) or water contrast (562 women). A …