Comparison Between a Single-Lead ECG Garment Device and a Holter Monitor: A Signal Quality Assessment

Luca Neri,Ivan Corazza,Matt T. Oberdier,Jessica Lago,Ilaria Gallelli,Arrigo F.G. Cicero,Igor Diemberger,Alessandro Orro,Amir Beker,Nazareno Paolocci,Henry R. Halperin,Claudio Borghi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02077-9
IF: 4.92
2024-05-28
Journal of Medical Systems
Abstract:Wearable electronics are increasingly common and useful as health monitoring devices, many of which feature the ability to record a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). However, recording the ECG commonly requires the user to touch the device to complete the lead circuit, which prevents continuous data acquisition. An alternative approach to enable continuous monitoring without user initiation is to embed the leads in a garment. This study assessed ECG data obtained from the YouCare device (a novel sensorized garment) via comparison with a conventional Holter monitor. A cohort of thirty patients (age range: 20–82 years; 16 females and 14 males) were enrolled and monitored for twenty-four hours with both the YouCare device and a Holter monitor. ECG data from both devices were qualitatively assessed by a panel of three expert cardiologists and quantitatively analyzed using specialized software. Patients also responded to a survey about the comfort of the YouCare device as compared to the Holter monitor. The YouCare device was assessed to have 70% of its ECG signals as "Good", 12% as "Acceptable", and 18% as "Not Readable". The R-wave, independently recorded by the YouCare device and Holter monitor, were synchronized within measurement error during 99.4% of cardiac cycles. In addition, patients found the YouCare device more comfortable than the Holter monitor (comfortable 22 vs. 5 and uncomfortable 1 vs. 18, respectively). Therefore, the quality of ECG data collected from the garment-based device was comparable to a Holter monitor when the signal was sufficiently acquired, and the garment was also comfortable.
health care sciences & services,medical informatics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the comparison in signal quality between a new single - lead electrocardiogram (ECG) clothing device (YouCare device) and the traditional Holter monitor. Specifically, the study aims to verify whether the YouCare device can achieve continuous ECG data collection without relying on user operation, and whether its data quality can reach the level of the Holter monitor of clinical standards. In addition, the study also focuses on the wearing comfort of this new device to evaluate its feasibility and user experience in practical applications. The paper addresses this problem through the following methods: 1. **Experimental Design**: 30 patients were recruited to use the YouCare device and the 3 - lead Holter monitor simultaneously for electrocardiogram monitoring within 24 hours. 2. **Signal Quality Assessment**: - **Qualitative Assessment**: Three cardiologists evaluated the quality of the electrocardiogram signals recorded by the two devices, classifying them as "good", "acceptable", and "unreadable". - **Quantitative Verification**: The R - R intervals recorded by the two devices were compared to analyze their synchrony. 3. **Patient Survey**: Through telephone interviews, the patients' evaluations of the wearing comfort of the two devices were collected. The research results show that the YouCare device is comparable to the Holter monitor in terms of signal quality. In particular, when the signal clarity is high, the R - wave synchronization rate reaches 99.4%. In addition, patients generally consider the YouCare device to be more comfortable than the Holter monitor. In conclusion, this study aims to prove that the YouCare device, as a new, comfortable, and continuous electrocardiogram monitoring tool, has the potential to replace the traditional Holter monitor. However, the study also points out areas that need further improvement, such as reducing Bluetooth connection problems and improving signal continuity.