Abstract:Engineering single base edits using CRISPR technology including specific deaminases and single-guide RNA (sgRNA) is a rapidly evolving field. Different types of base edits can be constructed, with cytidine base editors (CBEs) facilitating transition of C-to-T variants, adenine base editors (ABEs) enabling transition of A-to-G variants, C•G-to-G•C transversion base editors (CGBEs) and recently adenine transversion editors (AYBE) that create A-to-C and A-to-T variants. The base-editing machine learning algorithm BE-Hive predicts which sgRNAs and base editor constructs have the strongest likelihood of achieving desired base edits. We have used BE-Hive and TP53 mutation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas ovarian cancer cohort to predict which mutations can be engineered, or reverted to wild-type sequence, using CBEs, ABEs or CGBEs. We have developed and automated a ranking system to assist in selecting optimally designed sgRNA that considers the presence of a suitable protospacer adjacent motif (PAM), the frequency of predicted bystander edits, editing efficiency and target base change. We have generated single constructs containing ABE or CBE editing machinery, an sgRNA cloning backbone and an enhanced green fluorescent protein tag (EGFP), removing the need for co-transfection of multiple plasmids. We have tested our ranking system and new plasmid constructs to engineer the p53 mutants Y220C, R282W and R248Q into wild-type p53 cells and shown that these mutants cannot activate four p53 target genes, mimicking the behaviour of endogenous p53 mutations. This field will continue to rapidly progress, requiring new strategies such as we propose to ensure desired base-editing outcomes.

Joint genotypic and phenotypic outcome modeling improves base editing variant effect quantification

Annotation and Evaluation of Base Editing Outcomes in Multiple Cell Types Using CRISPRbase.

A side-by-side comparison of variant function measurements using deep mutational scanning and base editing

Comprehensive evaluation and prediction of editing outcomes for near-PAMless adenine and cytosine base editors

Activity-based selection for enhanced base editor mutational scanning

Towards optimizing diversifying base editors for high-throughput studies of single-nucleotide variants

Multiplexed base editing through Cas12a variant-mediated cytosine and adenine base editors

The Development and Application of a Base Editor in Biomedicine

Eliminating Base-Editor-induced Genome-Wide and Transcriptome-Wide Off-Target Mutations

SpRY-mediated screens facilitate functional dissection of non-coding sequences at single-base resolution

A benchmarked, high-efficiency prime editing platform for multiplexed dropout screening

Massively parallel quantification of CRISPR editing in cells by TRAP-seq enables better design of Cas9, ABE, CBE gRNAs of high efficiency and accuracy

Multimodal scanning of genetic variants with base and prime editing

CRISPR single base-editing: in silico predictions to variant clonal cell lines

Dual guide RNA-mediated concurrent C&G-to-T&A and A&T-to-G&C conversions using CRISPR base editors

Disease modeling by efficient genome editing using a near PAM-less base editor in vivo

Human genetic diversity alters off-target outcomes of therapeutic gene editing

Prime editing in mice reveals the essentiality of a single base in driving tissue-specific gene expression

Bystander base editing interferes with visual function restoration in Leber congenital amaurosis

Scalable assessment of genome editing off-targets associated with genetic variants

Dissecting quantitative trait nucleotides by saturation genome editing