Comprehensive evaluation and prediction of editing outcomes for near-PAMless adenine and cytosine base editors

Xiaoyu Zhou,Jingjing Gao,Liheng Luo,Changcai Huang,Jiayu Wu,Xiaoyue Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.08.588505
2024-04-11
Abstract:Base editors enable the direct conversion of target bases without inducing double-strand breaks, showing great potential for disease modeling and gene therapy. Yet, their applicability has been constrained by the necessity for specific protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). We generated four versions of near-PAMless base editors and systematically evaluated their editing patterns and efficiencies using an sgRNA-target library of 45,747 sequences. Near-PAMless base editors significantly expanded the targeting scope, with both PAM and target flanking sequences as determinants for editing outcomes. We developed BEguider, a deep learning model to accurately predict editing results for near-PAMless base editors. We also provided experimentally measured editing outcomes of 20,541 ClinVar sites, demonstrating that variants previously inaccessible by NGG PAM base editors can now be precisely generated or corrected. We have made our predictive tool and data available online to facilitate development and application of near-PAMless base editors in both research and clinical settings.
Bioinformatics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Expand the application range of base editors and improve their editing accuracy, especially when dealing with gene loci that could not be edited originally due to the lack of specific PAM sequences**. Specifically, traditional base editors (such as CBEs and ABEs) rely on specific PAM sequences (e.g., NGG), which limits their application range in the genome. To solve this problem, researchers have developed near - PAMless base editors, which can edit a wider range of gene loci, including those without the NGG PAM sequence. However, the editing efficiency and results of these new editors are somewhat unpredictable, so systematic evaluation and the establishment of prediction models are required to guide their application. To this end, the authors carried out the following tasks: 1. **Generate and optimize near - PAMless base editors**: By introducing SpRY variants and other optimization measures (such as YE1, TadA - 8e, etc.), multiple versions of near - PAMless CBEs and ABEs were generated, and their editing performance was preliminarily evaluated. 2. **Large - scale systematic evaluation**: A library containing 45,747 sgRNA target pairs was constructed to systematically evaluate the editing efficiency and results of these editors on different PAM sequences and target sequences. 3. **Develop the prediction model BEguider**: Based on experimental data, a deep - learning model BEguider was developed to accurately predict the editing efficiency and results of near - PAMless base editors. 4. **Application evaluation**: The BEguider model was used to evaluate the editing potential of near - PAMless base editors at 20,541 pathogenic variant loci in the ClinVar database, demonstrating the application prospects of these editors in disease modeling and gene therapy. Through these efforts, researchers have not only expanded the application range of base editors but also provided reliable prediction tools, thereby improving the feasibility and precision of base - editing technology in research and clinical applications.