Abstract:This study explores a previously overlooked nCas9‐centric strategy for enhancement of base editors (BE). Structure‐guided protein engineering establishes nCas9 variants that can commonly enhance a collection of BE tools. In support of their translational potential, the engineered CBE and ABE variants respectively enable 82% and 25% higher rates of editing than the controls in primary human T‐cells. Base editors (BEs) are a recent generation of genome editing tools that couple a cytidine or adenosine deaminase activity to a catalytically impaired Cas9 moiety (nCas9) to enable specific base conversions at the targeted genomic loci. Given their strong application potential, BEs are under active developments toward greater levels of efficiency and safety. Here, a previously overlooked nCas9‐centric strategy is explored for enhancement of BE. Based on a cytosine BE (CBE), 20 point mutations associated with nCas9‐target interaction are tested. Subsequently, from the initial positive X‐to‐arginine hits, combinatorial modifications are applied to establish further enhanced CBE variants (1.1–1.3). Parallel nCas9 modifications in other versions of CBEs including A3A‐Y130F‐BE4max, YEE‐BE4max, CGBE, and split‐AncBE4max, as well as in the context of two adenine BEs (ABE), likewise enhance their respective activities. The same strategy also substantially improves the efficiencies of high‐fidelity nCas9/BEs. Further evidence confirms that the stabilization of nCas9‐substrate interactions underlies the enhanced BE activities. In support of their translational potential, the engineered CBE and ABE variants respectively enable 82% and 25% higher rates of editing than the controls in primary human T‐cells. This study thus demonstrates a highly adaptable strategy for enhancing BE, and for optimizing other forms of Cas9‐derived tools.

Deep learning models to predict the editing efficiencies and outcomes of diverse base editors

Prediction of Base Editor Off-Targets by Deep Learning

Comprehensive evaluation and prediction of editing outcomes for near-PAMless adenine and cytosine base editors

BEdeepoff: an in Silico Tool for Off-Target Prediction of ABE and CBE Base Editors

BEdeepon: an in silico tool for prediction of base editor efficiencies and outcomes

Optimization of C-to-G base editors with sequence context preference predictable by machine learning methods

Internally inlaid SaCas9 base editors enable window specific base editing

Cooperativity between Cas9 and hyperactive AID establishes broad and diversifying mutational footprints in base editors

nCas9 Engineering for Improved Target Interaction Presents an Effective Strategy to Enhance Base Editing

Cas9-orthologue-mediated cytosine and adenine base editors recognizing NNAAAA PAM sequences

Rational Design of Enhanced Nme2Cas9 and Nme2 Cas9 Nucleases and Base Editors

Towards optimizing diversifying base editors for high-throughput studies of single-nucleotide variants

CRISPR–Cas9 gRNA efficiency prediction: an overview of predictive tools and the role of deep learning

Web-based design and analysis tools for CRISPR base editing

OPED: an Optimal Prime Editing Guide RNA Designer Based on Deep Learning and Transfer Learning

Two Compact Cas9 Ortholog-Based Cytosine Base Editors Expand the DNA Targeting Scope and Applications In Vitro and In Vivo

Annotation and Evaluation of Base Editing Outcomes in Multiple Cell Types Using CRISPRbase.

Docking Sites Inside Cas9 For Adenine Base Editing Diversification And Rna Off-Target Elimination

Machine learning prediction of prime editing efficiency across diverse chromatin contexts

Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells

Optimized CRISPR Guide RNA Design for Two High-Fidelity Cas9 Variants by Deep Learning.