Abstract:How does revenue diversification shape the budgetary solvency of city governments? Previous studies informed by the public choice/fiscal illusion perspective suggest that diversification leads to unsustainable government expansion and budgetary imbalance. In contrast, the organizational adaptation/modern portfolio theory suggests that diversification enables government to prepare for external fiscal shocks. We use different measures of revenue diversification and rely on audited financial information to develop general fund‐based and government‐wide budgetary solvency measures for more than 500 midsized and large cities in the United States from 2006 to 2012. Addressing omitted variable bias, the results of the econometric analyses indicate that the type of diversification matters. Specifically, diversifying to non‐tax sources improves budgetary solvency as indicated by higher government‐wide operating ratio and reserves, whereas diversifying within the tax structure produces the opposite effects. The contradictory results point to the need to rethink current theories of diversification, which do not recognize the different ways that revenue structures can be broadened, and how these produce distinct effects on fiscal performance. We lay out the critical first step in clarifying and further developing a more nuanced theory by proposing three causal mechanisms outlining the pathways through which the types of diversification can influence budget outcomes. • This study examines the relationship between tax and non‐tax revenue diversification and government‐wide budgetary solvency (structural budget balance). It is the first in the revenue diversification literature to consider the total revenues and costs of operating government and incorporates a broader base of tax and non‐tax revenue sources including utilities. • The results suggest that increased reliance on non‐tax revenue sources, such as charges and fees, improves budgetary solvency. • In contrast, we find evidence that increased diversification of tax instruments leads to poor budget outcomes. • When financial managers and policymakers are considering adopting a new revenue source or expanding a current revenue stream, from a budgetary solvency standpoint, non‐tax sources may be advantageous. This study examines the relationship between tax and non‐tax revenue diversification and government‐wide budgetary solvency (structural budget balance). It is the first in the revenue diversification literature to consider the total revenues and costs of operating government and incorporates a broader base of tax and non‐tax revenue sources including utilities. The results suggest that increased reliance on non‐tax revenue sources, such as charges and fees, improves budgetary solvency. In contrast, we find evidence that increased diversification of tax instruments leads to poor budget outcomes. When financial managers and policymakers are considering adopting a new revenue source or expanding a current revenue stream, from a budgetary solvency standpoint, non‐tax sources may be advantageous.

Nicola Limodio discussion of: Natural resource revenues and municipal finance

Valeria Merlo discussion of: Natural resource revenues and municipal finance

Who do you blame in local finance? An analysis of municipal financing in Italy

Revisiting the theory of revenue diversification: Insights from an empirical analysis of municipal budgetary solvency

Is there a fiscal resource curse? Resource rents, fiscal capacity and political institutions in developing economies

Bailing out expectations and public health expenditure

Do what we did last year, but do not stray too far from the pack: A behavioral public finance approach to municipal cash reserves

Local Policy Choice: Theory and Empirics

A fistful of dollars: Rent seeking behaviour and local tax manipulation

Effects of the Form of Government and Property Tax Limits on Local Finance in the Context of Revenue and Expenditure Simultaneity

Implementation of Discretionary Accrual in Local Governments and Motivation of Local Government Incentives: Literature Review

Are Central Government Rules Okay? Assessing the Hidden Costs of Centralised Discipline for Municipal Borrowing

Analyzing the causality between revenues and expenditures in Spanish municipalities and its policy implications

Theories, principles, opportunities and challenges of local government financing: A Comprehesive review of literature

The Effects of Fiscal Decentralisation on Publicly Provided Services and Labour Market

Women and local public finance

Proportional appropriation systems and financial statement quality in municipally owned entities: empirical evidence from Italy

Balancing fiscal expenditure competition and long-term innovation investment: Exploring trade-offs and policy implications for local governments

Does Devolution Crowd out Development? A Spatial Analysis of Us Local Government Fiscal Effort

Performance-Related Payments in Local Governments: Do They Improve Performance or Only Increase Salary?