Abstract:AIMS: To compare the current status of global alcohol corporations with tobacco in terms of their role in global governance and to document the process by which this difference has been achieved and the consequences for alcohol control policy.METHODS: Participant observation in the global political arena, review of industry materials (submissions, publications, conference presentations, websites) and review of published literature formed the basis for the current analysis.RESULTS: Recent events in the global political arena have highlighted the difference in perception of the alcohol and tobacco industries which has allowed alcohol corporations to participate in the global governance arena in a way in which tobacco has not been able. The transnational producers of alcohol have waged a sophisticated and successful campaign during the past three decades, including sponsorship of intergovernmental events, funding of educational initiatives, research, publications and sponsoring sporting and cultural events. A key aspect has been the framing of arguments to undermine perceptions of the extent of alcohol-related harms to health by promoting ideas of a balance of benefits and harms. An emphasis on the heaviest drinkers has been used to promote the erroneous idea that 'moderate' drinkers experience no harm and a goal of alcohol policy should be to ensure they are unaffected by interventions. This leads to highly targeted interventions towards the heaviest drinkers rather than effective regulation of the alcohol market.CONCLUSION: A sophisticated campaign by global alcohol corporations has promoted them as good corporate citizens and framed arguments with a focus on drinkers rather than the supply of alcohol. This has contributed to acceptance in the global governance arena dealing with policy development and implementation to an extent which is very different from tobacco. This approach, which obscures the contribution supply and marketing make to alcohol-related harm, has also contributed to failure by governments to adopt effective supply-side policies.

Industrial epidemics, public health advocacy and the alcohol industry: lessons from other fields.

Alcohol and public health

Public health, academic medicine, and the alcohol industry’s corporate social responsibility activities

Advancing public health policy making through research on the political strategies of alcohol industry actors

Under the influence: system-level effects of alcohol industry-funded health information organizations

Admirable ends, ineffective means: comments on the alcohol harm reduction strategy for England

Public health science and the global strategy on alcohol

The alcohol industry and public interest science

Managing alcohol problems and risky drinking

Alcohol: no ordinary commodity: research and public policy

Alcohol, No Ordinary Commodity: policy implications for Canada

Who is responsible for the public's health? The role of the alcohol industry in the WHO global strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol.

Linking science to policy: the role of international collaborative research

Alcohol industry marketing strategies in Latin America and the Caribbean: the way forward for policy research.

Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity-a summary of the third edition

Vested interests in addiction research and policy. Why do we not see the corporate interests of the alcohol industry as clearly as we see those of the tobacco industry?

Evidence-based alcohol policies are the answer

The social and public health significance of individually directed interventions

Alcohol research and the alcoholic beverage industry: issues, concerns and conflicts of interest

Alcohol policy research and the grey literature

Analysis of Alcohol Industry Submissions against Marketing Regulation