Abstract:Alcohol is socially accepted and widely consumed as a recreational beverage. Furthermore, it is used as a disinfectant for medicinal purposes and as a cultural asset it is also part of religious rituals. However, it is also an intoxicant and an addictive substance. The deleterious side of alcohol is reflected in the fact that around 3 million people worldwide die every year as a direct or indirect result of alcohol consumption. For several decades, epidemiological studies suggested that drinking alcohol in moderate quantities was beneficial. This was referred to as the "French paradox," which described differences in mortality between France and Finland mainly, but also other countries, that were found in epidemiological studies. The difference in the levels of alcohol consumption was found to explain the differences in mortality in view of the otherwise similar risk factors. When alcoholic drinks per day were plotted against all-cause mortality this led to a J-shaped curve. This finding represented a window of benefit for moderate alcohol consumption. However, the recent publication by Zhao et al. in 2023 revisited the relationship between the quantity of alcohol consumed and mortality risk and led to a paradigm change, which has influenced not only the recommendations of Canada's Guidance on Alcohol and Health but also the recommendations and guidelines of major health organizations: "No alcohol is better than a little." The J‐shaped curve as an explanation of the French paradox became a linear relationship between the amount of alcohol consumption and the increasing mortality from tumors and cardiovascular diseases. The renewed review of several control groups in previous epidemiological studies revealed a recruitment error due to the inclusion of abstinent ex-drinkers. Taking this bias into account, the alcohol-friendly view of small amounts of alcohol being cardioprotective had to be revised. The combined misuse of alcohol and other risk factors for carcinogenesis and heart diseases still needs further attention. The misuse of both alcohol and cocaine led to the conclusion that when the two risky substances are consumed together, it is even more detrimental than the mere sum of the two.

Alcohol, No Ordinary Commodity: policy implications for Canada

Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity-a summary of the third edition

Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity—a summary of the third edition

Alcohol: no ordinary commodity: research and public policy

An assessment of federal alcohol policies in Canada and priority recommendations: Results from the 3rd Canadian Alcohol Policy Evaluation Project

Alcohol and public policy: no ordinary commodity

The burden of alcohol on health care during COVID-19

Distributions of alcohol use and alcohol‐caused death and disability in Canada: Defining alcohol harm density functions and new perspectives on the prevention paradox

Exposure to Digital Alcohol Marketing and Alcohol Use: A Systematic Review

Alcohol and public health

Industrial epidemics, public health advocacy and the alcohol industry: lessons from other fields.

Alcohol and alcohol-related harm in China: policy changes needed

Reducing Alcohol Use Through Alcohol Control Policies in the General Population and Population Subgroups: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evidence-based alcohol policy in the Americas: strengths, weaknesses, and future challenges

Alcohol consumption—none is better than a little

Alcohol consumption and non-communicable diseases: epidemiology and policy implications

Harmful use of alcohol: a shadow over sub-Saharan Africa in need of workable solutions

Efficacy and the strength of evidence of US alcohol control policies

Alcohol use in Australia: countering harm with healing

Managing alcohol problems and risky drinking

Alcohol Policy Opinions in the United States over a 15-Year Period of Dynamic Per Capita Consumption Changes: Implications for Today's Public Health Practice