Abstract:Background Limiting the marginal bone loss is a prerequisite for long-term stability of implants. Previous studies have evaluated the factors affecting marginal bone loss, including the mucous thickness, the depth of placement. The biologic width will form when the implants are uncovered, which unvaryingly exposes the bone around the implant neck to the oral cavity and starts bone loss, and the biologic width is formed by dissected mucous and the depth of placement of implant at initial stage. Aim/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of the mucous thickness, the depth of placement and the initial biologic width on the marginal bone loss. Material and Methods The clinical and radiographic data of 181 delayed-loaded Ankylos Implants in 140 patients were collected after 1–5 years follow-up. The radiographic examination was taken after implant placement, before the second stage surgery, and after 1–5 years follow-up. The mucous thickness, the depth of placement and crestal bone loss were calculated medially and distally. The initial biologic width was defined as either the thickness of the mucous when the implant was positioned supracrestally, or the sum of the thickness of the mucous and the depth of the implant when the implant was placed below the bone level. Implants were divided into 3 groups based on the initial biologic width, Group A (width less than 3 mm, include 3 mm), Group B (between 3 mm and 4 mm, include 4 mm), and Group C (width more than 4 mm). Significance was set to 0.05. Results Implants in Group A had 0.4(0.1.0) mm bone loss mesially and 0.3(0.0.8) mm distally. For Group B, the bone loss values were m- 0.3(0.0.8) mm and d- 0.3(0.0.7) mm. Group C implants experienced bone loss of m- 0.7(0.2.1.1) mm and d- 0.6(0.1.1.0) mm. Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to find differences between groups. There was significant difference between groups (P = 0.011). Kruskal-Wallis test for implants placed below, at, or above the bone level yielded a statistically significant difference (P = 0.000). The calculation of Spearman's correlation coefficient between the mucous thickness and the marginal bone loss shows negative correlation (rs=−0.243, P = 0.001), while the depth of placement and the marginal bone loss show the positive correlation (rs=0.477, P = 0.000). Conclusions and Clinical Implications The crestal bone loss was found to be the positively correlated to the depth of placement and had negative correlated to the mucous thickness. The result may suggest that the closer the initial biologic width is to the final biologic width, the less bone loss is, and if the initial biologic width is not adequate, bone loss may occur to ensure the proper development of biologic width.

Effect of vertical implant position on marginal bone loss: a randomized clinical trial

The Effect of Vertical Implant Position in Relation to Adjacent Teeth on Marginal Bone Loss in Posterior Arches: A Retrospective Study

Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Crestal Bone Loss‐ a Clinical Retrospective Study of 1–5 Years

The Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study.

The suppression of hypoxia-inducible factor and vascular endothelial growth factor by siRNA does not affect the radiation sensitivity of multicellular tumor spheroids.

Factors Influencing Early Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants Positioned Subcrestally: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study

Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

Effect of different implant placement depths on crestal bone levels and soft tissue behavior: a randomized clinical trial

Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Loss Between Axial and Tilted Implant: An Umbrella Review with Meta-analysis

Influence of buccal and palatal bone thickness on post-surgical marginal bone changes around implants placed in posterior maxilla: a multi-centre prospective study

Artificial gravity maintains skeletal muscle protein synthesis during 21 days of simulated microgravity.

Clinical Observation on Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss Around Bone Level Implants and Tissue Level Im-Plants in Posterior Region

How do the dimensions of peri‐implant mucosa affect marginal bone loss in equicrestal and subcrestal position of implants? A 1‐year clinical trial

Effect of different geometric changes in the dental implant abutment body on the amount of residual excess cement and retention in a cemented implant-supported prosthesis

Diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in chronic pancreatitis: 13C-Mixed Triglyceride Breath Test versus Fecal Elastase.

Effect of different implant positions for two implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a retrospective 5-years radiographic evaluation of the circumferential peri-implant bone loss and posterior ridge resorptive changes

Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study

The effect of one-time abutment placement on interproximal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissues: a prospective randomized clinical trial

Structural Evaluation of the Effect of Bone Quality on the Mechanical Interaction between Dental Implants and Bone

[Influence of the Placing Depth of Implants with Platform Switching on the Marginal Bone Level in the Posterior Mandible: a Clinical Study].

Marginal bone loss and soft tissue health around two-implant mandibular overdenture retained with milled versus selective laser melted cobalt chromium bar: a randomized clinical trial