Pro‐Ictal EEG Scheduling Improves the Yield of Epilepsy Monitoring: Validating the Use of Multiday Seizure Cycles to Optimize Video‐EEG Timing

Jodie Naim‐Feil,Rachel E. Stirling,Philippa J. Karoly,Daniel Payne,Nicholas Winterling,Dominique Eden,Mark J. Cook,David B. Grayden,Matias Maturana,Dean R. Freestone,Ewan S. Nurse
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27078
IF: 11.2
2024-10-03
Annals of Neurology
Abstract:Objective A significant challenge of video‐electroencephalography (vEEG) in epilepsy diagnosis is timing monitoring sessions to capture epileptiform activity. In this study, we introduce and validate "pro‐ictal EEG scheduling", a method to schedule vEEG monitoring to coincide with periods of increased seizure likelihood as a low‐risk approach to enhance the diagnostic yield. Methods A database of long‐term ambulatory vEEG monitoring sessions (n = 5,038) of adults and children was examined. Data from linked electronic seizure diaries were extracted (minimum 10 self‐reported events) to generate cycle‐based estimates of seizure risk. In adults, vEEG monitoring sessions coinciding with periods of estimated high‐risk were allocated to the high‐risk group (n = 305) and compared to remaining studies (baseline: n = 3,586). Test of proportions and risk‐ratios (RR) were applied to index differences in proportions and likelihood of capturing outcome measures (abnormal report, confirmed seizure, and diary event) during monitoring. The impact of clinical and demographic factors (age, sex, epilepsy‐type, and medication) was also explored. Results During vEEG monitoring, the high‐risk group was significantly more likely to have an abnormal vEEG report (190/305:62% vs 1,790/3,586:50% [%change = 12%], RR = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.137–1.370], p
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?