Safety and efficacy of rapid withdrawal of antiseizure medications during long-term video-electroencephalogram monitoring in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: A retrospective study

Shuang Wang,Wen Wang,Guojing Yu,Lin Wan,Yuying Fan,Hongjie Wang,Tong Liu,Taoyun Ji,Qingzhu Liu,Lixin Cai,Xiaoyan Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12680
2023-01-01
Epilepsia Open
Abstract:ObjectivePerforming long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring (LTVEM) to obtain the ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) is important for presurgical evaluation. This study aimed at investigating the safety and efficacy of our protocol developed at Peking University First Hospital (PUFH) for rapid withdrawal of antiseizure medications (ASMs) during LTVEM to induce seizures in children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) exhibiting nondaily seizures. MethodsChildren with DRE who followed the PUFH protocol for rapid withdrawal of ASMs during LTVEM between 2018 and 2021 were enrolled. The occurrence of seizures, number of ASMs withdrawn, seizure onset time after ASM tapering initiation, changes in interictal epileptiform discharge (IED), and adverse events were evaluated during LTVEM. ResultsAmong 80 children evaluated in this study, seizures were induced successfully in 72 (90%) children. Furthermore, no change in IED sites was observed in these 72 children following the initiation of ASM tapering while 2 children exhibited secondary bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. The median time from ASM tapering initiation to the onset of the first seizure was found to be 3 days (2-4), while the median number of ASMs withdrawn was 2 (1-2). Finally, 66 children (91.7%) had habitual seizures while 6 children had nonhabitual seizure semiology. SignificanceThe PUFH protocol can be used for the rapid withdrawal of ASMs during LTVEM in children with DRE. Using this protocol, ictal EEG patterns can be obtained in a relatively short time for most patients with fewer adverse effects during LTVEM, which may provide meaningful electro-clinical information for presurgical evaluation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?