Can video laryngoscopy and supplemental oxygen redefine pediatric, infant and neonatal tracheal intubation standards?
Laila Pinto Coelho,Thomaz Bittencourt Couto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-530
2024-03-26
Translational Pediatrics
Abstract:Laila Pinto Coelho 1^ , Thomaz Bittencourt Couto 2,3^ 1 Postgraduate Medical Education Department, University of São Paulo Faculty of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil; 2 Pediatric Emergency Department, Instituto da Criança do Hospital das Clínicas, Children's Hospital, University of São Paulo Faculty of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil; 3 Simulation Center, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil ^ ORCID: Laila Pinto Coelho, 0000-0002-7381-9549; Thomaz Bittencourt Couto, 0000-0003-4744-981X. Comment on: Riva T, Engelhardt T, Basciani R, et al . Direct versus video laryngoscopy with standard blades for neonatal and infant tracheal intubation with supplemental oxygen: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2023;7:101-11. Keywords: Pediatric; laryngoscopy; tracheal intubation (TI); neonatal Submitted Oct 26, 2023. Accepted for publication Feb 05, 2024. Published online Mar 22, 2024. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-530 Children, especially neonates, are more vulnerable to respiratory distress than adults. Neonatal and young infants' specific developmental airway anatomy and respiratory physiology features, such as high airflow resistance, high airway collapsibility, high oxygen consumption with increased metabolism, and low reserve, contribute to a higher risk for respiratory failure (1,2). Anesthesia and tracheal intubation (TI), added to their higher vulnerability to airway obstruction and lower apnea tolerance, may lead to oxygen desaturation and critical outcomes (1,2). Every neonatal intubation should be considered a critical event (2). In pediatric and neonatal intensive care units (PICU and NICU, respectively) as well as pediatric emergency departments, clinical instability may add to the factors mentioned above, turning TI of critically ill patients into a high-risk procedure that can be associated with several adverse events (3,4). TI-associated events (TIAEs) are common in those settings, with TIAE rates estimated at around 18% in PICUs, 20% in NICUs, and 15% in pediatric emergency departments (3-5). In addition to clinical factors, previous studies demonstrated that increased TI attempts led to higher rates of TIAEs and severe desaturation (5-8). TI first attempt failure has been associated with a higher risk of severe adverse TIAEs such as cardiopulmonary arrest in critically ill patients with respiratory compromise (9). Ongoing efforts aim to improve the success rate of initial pediatric TI while minimizing TIAEs. These initiatives encompass the adoption of video laryngoscopy (VL) and the integration of apneic oxygenation (AO) methodologies. VL enables indirect visualization of laryngeal structures through high-resolution cameras and video systems. It has been increasingly used in PICU and NICU and pediatric emergency departments with promising results. In a prospective observational cohort study conducted in an academic pediatric tertiary emergency department, Couto et al. found that, when compared to DL, VL was associated with a higher success rate of first-attempt TI and a lower rate of TIAEs. This same study showed an 80% improvement in success rate compared to previously published historical series (10). According to a retrospective review of prospective collected observational data from the NEAR4KIDS (National Emergency Airway Registry for Children) database, VL use was independently associated with a lower occurrence of TIAEs among PICUs and cardiac ICU patients (11). In neonatal settings, VL has also been proven to be clinically significant and has been associated with fewer TIAES when compared to DL use (6,12,13). In an extensive retrospective review of prospective collected observational data from the National Emergency Airway Registry for Neonates (NEAR4NEOS), Moussa et al. found that, although VL use was not independently associated with higher TI first attempt success, it was associated with lower TIAEs (13). A systematic review that included three randomized trials that compared VL with DL for neonatal TI by trainees showed that VL increased IT first attempt success rate (moderate evidence) (12). VL has also gained a potential role in less invasive surfactant administration for neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. While enabling indirect visualization of the upper airway, VL can help guide adequate catheter placement for further surfactant administration (14). Furthermore, VL has become an important teaching tool in TI training. Previous studies have shown superior success rates of TI in simulated patients after training with VL compared to DL among trainees (15,16). In association with simulation-based mastery learning, VL use for TI training may lead to increased intubation-related skills and greater safety in TI (17). However, although -Abstract Truncated-
pediatrics