Abstract:The average simulated stream δ2H for the sub‐basins in the Eerste River using the (a) J2000‐isoCal (streamflow and isotope calibration), (b) J2000‐isoVal (streamflow calibration only), (c) J2000‐isoRSM (streamflow and isotope calibration using isotope data from IsoRSM), (d) J2000‐isoGSM (streamflow and isotope calibration using isotope data from IsoGSM) and (e) J2000‐isoRSM biasC with both streamflow and isotope calibration using a linear bias corrected IsoRSM as well as calibration with only sensitive parameters, with the stream Kling Gupta efficiency (KGE: Gupta et al., 2009) obtained for each of the measured surface water isotopes. (ai–di) shows a time series plot of simulated stream and precipitation δ2H compared with measured surface water isotopes for the reach segments 744 and 876 across the different model calibrations. (ai) includes the top 100 Monte Carlo runs from the sensitivity analysis. Isotope‐enabled models provide a means to generate robust hydrological simulations. However, daily isotope‐enabled rainfall‐runoff models applied to larger spatial scales (>100 km2) require more input data than conventional non‐isotope models in the form of precipitation isotope time series, which are difficult to generate even with point station measurements. Spatially distributed isotope data can be circumvented by isotope‐enabled climate models. Here, we evaluate the hydrological simulations of the J2000‐isotope enabled hydrological model driven with data from corrected and un‐corrected isotope‐enabled global and regional climate models (isotope‐enabled global spectral model [IsoGSM] and isotope‐enabled regional spectral model [IsoRSM], respectively) compared with 1 year of measured reference station and a yearly average precipitation isotope input for a pilot site, the data‐scarce sub‐humid Eerste River catchment in South Africa. The models driven by all input products performed well for upstream and downstream discharge gauges with Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) from 0.58 to 0.85 and LogNSE of 0.66 to 0.93. The simulated δ2H stream isotopes using the reference J2000‐iso and J2000‐isoRSM were good for the main river with a stream Kling Gupta efficiency (KGE) of between 0.4–0.9 and the top 100 Monte Carlo simulations varying by around 5‰ for δ2H. For smaller tributaries the model was unable to capture the measured stream isotopes due to biased precipitation isotope inputs. Adjusting the J2000‐iso with a bias corrected IsoRSM improved the stream and groundwater isotope simulation and outperformed the model driven by an average yearly precipitation isotope input. Differences in simulated hydrological processes were only evident between the models when evaluating percolation with unrealistic simulations for the standard J2000 model. While the regional climate model is computationally more intensive than its global counterpart, it provided better stream isotope simulations and improvements to simulated percolation. Our results indicate that isotope‐enabled climate models can provide useful input data in data scarce regions for hydrological models, where improved water management to address climate change impacts is needed.

Evaluating input data sources for isotope‐enabled rainfall‐runoff models

Advancing isotope‐enabled hydrological modelling for ungauged calibration of data‐scarce humid tropical catchments

Towards the development of an isotope‐enabled rainfall‐runoff model: Improving the ability to capture hydrological and anthropogenic change

Towards hydrological model calibration and validation: simulation of stable water isotopes using the isoWATFLOOD model

Isotope data-constrained hydrological model improves soil moisture simulation and runoff source apportionment

Effects of streamflow isotope sampling strategies on the calibration of a tracer‐aided rainfall‐runoff model

Process‐Based Intercomparison of Water Isotope‐Enabled Models and Reanalysis Nudging Effects

Evaluating Model Outputs Using Integrated Global Speleothem Records of Climate Change Since the Last Glacial

Using an Isotope Enabled Mass Balance to Evaluate Existing Land Surface Models

How well do the multi-satellite and atmospheric reanalysis products perform in hydrological modelling

Evapotranspiration Simulations in ISIMIP2a—Evaluation of Spatio-Temporal Characteristics with a Comprehensive Ensemble of Independent Datasets

The Water Isotopic Version of the Land-Surface Model ORCHIDEE: Implementation, Evaluation, Sensitivity to Hydrological Parameters

Isotopic evaluation of the National Water Model reveals missing agricultural irrigation contributions to streamflow across the western United States

The impact of evaporation fractionation on the inverse estimation of soil hydraulic and isotope transport parameters

Developing a model to assess the impact of farm dams and irrigation for data-scarce catchments

The Value of Water Isotope Data on Improving Process Understanding in a Glacierized Catchment on the Tibetan Plateau

Synoptic water isotope surveys to understand the hydrology of large intensively managed catchments

A method for predicting hydrogen and oxygen isotope distributions across a region’s river network using reach-scale environmental attributes

Simulated stable water isotopes during the mid-Holocene and pre-industrial using AWI-ESM-2.1-wiso

Worldwide Evaluation of Mean and Extreme Runoff from Six Global-Scale Hydrological Models That Account for Human Impacts

Can we use precipitation isotope outputs of Isotopic General Circulation Models to improve hydrological modeling in large mountainous catchments on the Tibetan Plateau?