Relationship between pericoronary fat attenuation values quantified by coronary computed tomography angiography and coronary artery disease severity

Mengyuan Jing,Huaze Xi,Jingjing Yang,Hao Zhu,Qiu Sun,Wei Ren,Liangna Deng,Tao Han,Yuting Zhang,Junlin Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.02.020
IF: 3.389
2024-05-09
Clinical Radiology
Abstract:Aim To explore the relationship between pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI) values and coronary artery disease (CAD) severity measured using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Materials And Methods This study retrospectively included 428 patients with CAD who were eligible and underwent CCTA at our hospital. CAD severity on CCTA images including obstructive stenosis and extensive lesions, and segment stenosis and involvement score (SSS, SIS), and CAD-RADS classification were assessed. FAI values for left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX) branches, and right coronary artery (RCA) were quantified using fully automated software. The relationship between FAI values and CAD severity was assessed using univariate and multivariate regression models. Results Univariate analyses showed that sex and current smoking were associated with elevated FAI LAD and FAI LCX values (all P <0.05), whereas CAD severity was not relevant (all P >0.05). Not only clinical factors such as gender, current smoking, and hypertension were associated with elevated FAI RCA , but also indicators to assess CAD severity including obstructive stenosis, SIS, and SSS were related to it (all P <0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that after correcting for the effects of other conventional cardiovascular risk factors and CCTA imaging features, current smoking was an independent risk factor for elevated FAI values (odds ratio [OR] = 0.569, 0.458, and 0.517; all P <0.05), whereas that SSS (OR=1.041, P =0.027) for elevated FAI RCA values. Conclusions Following correction for conventional cardiovascular risk factors and imaging characteristics, current smoking was an independent clinical risk factor for elevated FAI values, and SSS was an independent risk factor for elevated FAI RCA values.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?