Long-term Prognostic Value of the Serial Changes of CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve and Perivascular Fat Attenuation Index.

Xu Dai,Yang Hou,Chunxiang Tang,Zhigang Lu,Chengxing Shen,Longjiang Zhang,Jiayin Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-424
2022-01-01
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Abstract:Background To investigate the serial changes of computed tomography (CT) fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and fat attenuation index (FAI), and explore their relationships with long-term clinical outcomes. Methods Consecutive symptomatic patients with an intermediate pretest probability of coronary artery disease 1-4 were prospectively enrolled if coronary CT angiography (CCTA) revealed at least 1 lesion with 30-70% stenosis on major epicardial arteries. Follow-up CCTA was performed at 1 to 1.5-year intervals. All patients were further followed up after the second CCTA until September 2019. The Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) grade, high-risk plaque features, lesion-specific CT-FFR, and FAI were measured for prognosis analysis. Results A total of 263 patients were included in the analysis, and 38 major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) occurred. In the MACE group, the lesion-specific CT-FFR decreased significantly at the follow-up CCTA [0.80 (0.74-0.90) versus 0.85 (0.76-0.93); P=0.01], whereas the FAI did not notably increase (-70.4±8.9 versus -71.3±7.1 HU; P=0.436). In the non-MACE group, lesion-specific CT-FFR increased markedly [0.91 (0.84-0.95) versus 0.90 (0.82-0.94); P<0.001], while the FAI decreased substantially (-74.0±10.8 versus -72.4±11.5 HU; P=0.004). Decreased CT-FFR (adjusted overall hazard ratio =2.455; P=0.023) and increased FAI (adjusted hazard ratio =2.956; P=0.002) were the strongest independent predictors of MACEs. Serial changes of CT-FFR and FAI provided incremental prognostic value (Concordance statistic =0.716; P=0.003; over conventional clinical and imaging parameters (Concordance statistic =0.762; P=0.004). Conclusions Decreased CT-FFR and increased FAI at follow-up CCTA were the 2 strongest predictors of MACEs. Serial changes of CT-FFR and FAI provided incremental prognostic value over conventional clinical and imaging parameters for risk stratification. In addition, decreased CT-FFR provided incremental predictive value for MACEs from 15 months after second CCTA, while increased FAI added prognostic value from the second CCTA onwards.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?