A scoping review of empirical evidence on the impacts of the DRG introduction in Germany and Switzerland

Insa Koné,Bettina Maria Zimmermann,Karin Nordström,Bernice Simone Elger,Tenzin Wangmo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2669
2018-11-13
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Abstract:CONTEXT: Germany and Switzerland have introduced diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) for hospital reimbursement. This scoping review aims to evaluate if empirical evidence exists on the effect of the DRG introduction.METHODS: Medline via PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL, PsychINFO, and Psyndex were systematically screened for studies from 2003 onwards using keywords-DRG, prospective payment system, and lump sum-in English, German, and French. Abstracts were screened for alignment with our inclusion criteria and classified as editorial/commentary, review, or empirical study. The full-text extraction included data on country, study design, collected data, study population, specialty, comparison group, and outcome measures.RESULTS: Our literature search yielded 1944 references, of which 1405 references were included in the abstract screening after removal of duplicates. 135 articles were relevant to DRG, including 94 editorials/comments/reviews and 41 empirical articles from 36 different samples. The most frequently used outcome parameters were length of stay (12), reimbursement/cost (9), and case numbers (9).CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of identified articles (30.4%; 41 of 135) presented empirical data. This indicates that discussion on the topic is not totally evidence-based. The only common trend was a decrease in length of stay.
public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?