[RADIATION-PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF AET IN RADIATION-INDUCED DOMINANT LETHAL MUTATION IN MICE].

U. Ehling

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Impact of a Pilot Reform on the Diagnosis-Related-groups Payment System in China: a Difference-in-difference Study

Weiyan Jian,Ming Lu,Kit Yee Chan,Adrienne N. Poon,Wei Han,Mu Hu,Winnie Yip

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00604-2

2015-01-01

Scientia Forestalis

Abstract:BackgroundThe Chinese Government has announced plans to reform provider-payment methods at public hospitals by moving from fee-for-service to prospective and aggregated methods including diagnosis-related groups (DRG) to control health expenditures. In 2012, Beijing pioneered China's first DRG payment system in six hospitals. The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of Beijing's DRG pilot reform in reducing expenditures, out-of-pocket payments, and potential behaviors to circumvent payment control, including readmissions, selection, and cost-shifting.MethodsWe obtained discharge data from the Beijing Health Insurance Bureau for the period January, 2010, to September, 2012, from 14 tertiary general hospitals, which included six hospitals piloting DRGs within a portion of their payment system and eight control hospitals that implemented purely fee-for-service-based payment. Using a differences-in-differences design, we used hospital discharge data to assess the pilot's impact on cost containment. We did regression analyses to assess associations of DRG payment with outcome variables of health expenditures, length-of-stay, and out-of-pocket payment. The study was approved by Peking University Committee for Biomedical Researches.FindingsPost-reform, there were 36 780 cases using DRG payments and 50 322 cases in the control hospitals paid through fee-for-service. Our findings showed that DRG payment led to ¥1251 (6·2%) reductions in health expenditure and ¥647 (10·5%) reductions in out-of-pocket payment per admission. Length of stay or cost-shifting did not differ between DRG and non-DRG cases. Readmission rates were reduced (–1·4%) with DRG payment relative to non-DRG. About 19 814 (35%) potential DRG cases, however, were reverted back to fee-for-service-based payment. Hospitals processed the payment of older patients with more complications through fee-for-service payment, circumventing the effectiveness of payment reform.InterpretationFor China and other low-income and middle-income countries to fully implement prospective payment systems, such as DRG payments, without allowing circumvention seen in a partially implemented system, it might first be necessary to strengthen core monitoring and technological systems that would support feasibility of DRG payments. Continuous evidence-based monitoring and assessment, partnered with adequate management systems, are necessary to enable these countries to broadly implement DRGs and refine payment systems.FundingChina Medical Board (grant number CMB-OC-12-120).
Impact of precoding on reimbursement in diagnosis-related group systems: Randomized controlled trial

Ignazio Tarantino,Bernhard Widmann,Rene Warschkow,Michael Weitzendorfer,Susanne Bock,Sandra Roeske,Fariba Abbassi,Rosita Sortino,Bruno M Schmied,Thomas Steffen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106173

Abstract:Background: Complete and correct documentation of diagnosis and procedures is essential for adequate health provider reimbursement in diagnosis-related group (DRG) systems. The objective of this study was to investigate whether daily monitoring and semiautomated proposal optimization of DRG coding (precoding) is associated with higher reimbursement per hospitalization day. Materials and methods: This parallel-group, unblinded, randomized clinical trial randomized patients 1:1 into intervention (precoding) and control groups. Between June 12 and December 6, 2019 all hospitalized patients (1566 cases) undergoing elective or emergency surgery at the department of surgery in a Swiss hospital were eligible for this study. By random sample selection, cases were assigned to the intervention (precoding) and control groups. The primary outcome was the total reimbursement, divided by the length of stay. Results: Of the 1205 randomized cases, 1200 (precoding group: 602) remained for intention-to-treat, and 1131 (precoding group: 564) for per-protocol analysis. Precoding increased reimbursement per hospitalization day by 6.5% (160 US dollars; 95% confidence interval 31 to 289; P = 0.015). In a regression analysis patients hospitalized 7 days or longer, precoding increased reimbursement per day by 10.0% (246 US dollars; 95% confidence interval -12 to 504; P = 0.021). More secondary diagnoses (mean [SD]: 5.16 [5.60] vs 4.39 [5.34]; 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 1.39; P = 0.015) and nonsurgical postoperative complications (mean [SD]: 0.68 [1.45] vs 0.45 [1.12]; 0.23; 95% confidence interval 0.08 to 0.38; P = 0.002) were documented by precoding. No associated was observed regarding the length of stay, total reimbursement, or case mix index. The mean (SD) precoding time effort was 37 (27) minutes per case. Conclusion: Physician-led precoding increases DRG-based reimbursement. Precoding is time consuming and should be focused on cases with a longer hospital stay to increase efficiency.
Impact of Diagnosis-Related Group Payment System on the Variation in Hospitalization Expenditures: A Case-Control Study with a Propensity-Score-Matched Control Group

Xiaoqi Fan,Zhifan Wang,Shanshan Huo,Ziyan Chen,Weiyan Jian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1131573/v1

2021-01-01

Abstract:Abstract Background One of the important ways to reduce medical costs and improve quality of care is to enable physicians to provide standard medical services according to clinical guidelines, and the medical payment system is a significant means of guiding the behaviour of health service providers. This study aims to investigate whether the diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment system can improve the consistency of health services. Method Inpatients with three types of disease—chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cerebral infarction (CI)—were enrolled from 25 county-level hospitals in a DRG pilot city in China. Inpatients from hospitals that implemented DRG payment were selected as the intervention group, and similar inpatient cases from hospitals that still implemented fee-for-services (FFS) payment were designated as the control group. A propensity matching score (PSM) was used for data matching to control for age, gender and disease severity. The variation of hospitalization expenditures and their trends before and after implementation of the DRG policy were described by using these matched samples. Results After DRG implementation, the standard deviation (SD) of hospitalization expenditures in the COPD, AMI and CI intervention groups decreased by 11094 yuan, 4833 yuan and 425 yuan, respectively, which were 5972, 2484, and 2938 yuan more than that in the control group. In each year after DRG implementation, the interquartile range (IQR) of hospitalization expenditures was smaller in DRG group than that in FFS group. In most years, the degree of variation in costs of the intervention group decreased more than that of the control group. The medians of hospitalization expenditures of the intervention groups were lower than the fixed cost, while most medians of the control groups were higher than the fixed cost. Conclusion A comparison of patients with similar demographics and disease characteristics revealed that patients in the DRG group experienced a smaller degree of variation in hospitalization expenditures, and indicated the expenditures had a tendency to become progressively more concentrated over time. It is suggested that DRG system can promote better consistency in health services and reduce medical costs.
Effect of diagnosis related groups implementation on the intensive care unit of a Swiss tertiary hospital: a cohort study

Lionel Chok,Esther B. Bachli,Peter Steiger,Dominique Bettex,Silvia R. Cottini,Emanuela Keller,Marco Maggiorini,Reto A. Schuepbach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2869-4

2018-02-05

BMC Health Services Research

Abstract:BackgroundIn 2013 the Swiss Diagnosis Related Groups ((Swiss)-DRG) was implemented in Intensive Care Units (ICU). Its impact on hospitalizations has not yet been examined. We compared the number of ICU admissions, according to clinical severity and referring institution, and screened whether implementation of Swiss-DRG affected admission policy, ICU length-of-stay (ICU-LOS) or ICU mortality.MethodsRetrospective, single centre, cohort study conducted at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland between January 2009 and end of September 2013. Demographic and clinical data was retrieved from a quality assurance database.ResultsAdmissions (n = 17,231) before the introduction of Swiss-DRG were used to model expected admissions after DRG, and then compared to the observed admissions. Forecasting matched observations in patients with a high clinical severity admitted from internal units and external hospitals (admitted / predicted: 709 / 703, [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 658–748] and 302 / 332, [95% CI, 269–365] respectively). In patients with low severity of disease, in-house admissions became more frequent than expected and external admission were less frequent (admitted / predicted: 1972 / 1910, [95% CI, 1898–1940] and 436 / 518, [95% CI, 482–554] respectively). Various mechanisms related to Swiss-DRG may have led to these changes. DRG could not be linked to significant changes in regard to ICU-LOS and ICU mortality.ConclusionsDRG introduction had not affected ICU admissions policy, except for an increase of in-house patients with a low clinical severity of disease. DRG had neither affected ICU mortality nor ICU-LOS.

health care sciences & services
A scoping review of empirical evidence on the impacts of the DRG introduction in Germany and Switzerland

Insa Koné,Bettina Maria Zimmermann,Karin Nordström,Bernice Simone Elger,Tenzin Wangmo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2669

2018-11-13

The International Journal of Health Planning and Management

Abstract:CONTEXT: Germany and Switzerland have introduced diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) for hospital reimbursement. This scoping review aims to evaluate if empirical evidence exists on the effect of the DRG introduction.METHODS: Medline via PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL, PsychINFO, and Psyndex were systematically screened for studies from 2003 onwards using keywords-DRG, prospective payment system, and lump sum-in English, German, and French. Abstracts were screened for alignment with our inclusion criteria and classified as editorial/commentary, review, or empirical study. The full-text extraction included data on country, study design, collected data, study population, specialty, comparison group, and outcome measures.RESULTS: Our literature search yielded 1944 references, of which 1405 references were included in the abstract screening after removal of duplicates. 135 articles were relevant to DRG, including 94 editorials/comments/reviews and 41 empirical articles from 36 different samples. The most frequently used outcome parameters were length of stay (12), reimbursement/cost (9), and case numbers (9).CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of identified articles (30.4%; 41 of 135) presented empirical data. This indicates that discussion on the topic is not totally evidence-based. The only common trend was a decrease in length of stay.

public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services
A physician-led initiative to improve clinical documentation results in improved health care documentation, case mix index, and increased contribution margin

Francesco A Aiello,Dejah R Judelson,Jonathan M Durgin,Danielle R Doucet,Jessica P Simons,Dawn M Durocher,Julie M Flahive,Andres Schanzer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.02.038

Abstract:Introduction: Clinical documentation is the key determinant of inpatient acuity of illness and payer reimbursement. Every inpatient hospitalization is placed into a diagnosis related group with a relative value based on documented procedures, conditions, comorbidities and complications. The Case Mix Index (CMI) is an average of these diagnosis related groups and directly impacts physician profiling, medical center profiling, reimbursement, and quality reporting. We hypothesize that a focused, physician-led initiative to improve clinical documentation of vascular surgery inpatients results in increased CMI and contribution margin. Methods: A physician-led coding initiative to educate physicians on the documentation of comorbidities and conditions was initiated with concurrent chart review sessions with coding specialists for 3 months, and then as needed, after the creation of a vascular surgery documentation guide. Clinical documentation and billing for all carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and open infrainguinal procedures (OIPs) performed between January 2013 and July 2016 were stratified into precoding and postcoding initiative groups. Age, duration of stay, direct costs, actual reimbursements, contribution margin (CM), CMI, rate of complication or comorbidity, major complication or comorbidity, severity of illness, and risk of mortality assigned to each discharge were abstracted. Data were compared over time by standardizing Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) values for each diagnosis related group and using a CMS base rate reimbursement. Results: Among 458 CEA admissions, postcoding initiative CEA patients (n = 253) had a significantly higher CMI (1.36 vs 1.25; P = .03), CM ($7859 vs $6650; P = .048), and CMS base rate reimbursement ($8955 vs $8258; P = .03) than precoding initiative CEA patients (n = 205). The proportion of admissions with a documented major complication or comorbidity and complication or comorbidity was significantly higher after the coding initiative (43% vs 27%; P < .01). Among 504 OIPs, postcoding initiative patients (n = 227) had a significantly higher CMI (2.23 vs 2.05; P < .01), actual reimbursement ($23,203 vs $19,909; P < .01), CM ($12,165 vs $8840; P < .01), and CMS base rate reimbursement ($14,649 vs $13,496; P < .01) than precoding initiative patients (n = 277). The proportion of admissions with a documented major complication or comorbidity and complication or comorbidity was significantly higher after the coding initiative (61% vs 43%; P < .01). For both CEA and OIPs, there were no differences in age, duration of stay, total direct costs, or primary insurance status between the precoding and postcoding patient groups. Conclusions: Accurate and detailed clinical documentation is required for key stakeholders to characterize the acuity of inpatient admissions and ensure appropriate reimbursement; it is also a key component of risk-adjustment methods for assessing quality of care. A physician-led documentation initiative significantly increased CMI and CM.
Introducing Diagnosis-Related Groups: is the Information System Ready?

Weiyan Jian,Ming Lu,Wei Han,Mu Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2270

2014-01-01

Abstract:Diagnosis-related group (DRG) system is a classification system widely used in health managements, the foundation of which lies in the medical information system. A large effort had been made to improve the quality of discharge data before the introduction of DRGs in Beijing. We extract discharge data from 108 local hospitals spanning 4 years before and after standardization to evaluate the impact of standardization on DRG grouping performance. The data was grouped on an annual basis in accordance with Beijing's local DRG system. Proportion of ungrouped data, coefficient of variation (CV) and reduction in variance (RIV) were used to measure the performance of the DRG system. Both the descriptive and regression analysis indicate a significant reduction in terms of ungrouped data and CV for expenditure, increase of RIV for expenditure and length of stay. However, when there was no intervention, that is, between 2005 and 2006 and between 2008 and 2009, changes in these indicators were all insignificant. Therefore, the standardization of discharge data did improve data quality and consequently enhanced the performance of DRGs. Developing countries with a relatively weak information infrastructure should strengthen their medical information system before the introduction of the DRG system.
Improving the clinical ability and quality of endocrinology department with diagnosis-related groups tool

Sheng Ding,Xiaowan Jiang,Yuming Zheng,Tao Feng,Hong Mao,Zhi Chen,Wei Cai,Zhongjing Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-147

IF: 3.616

2022-02-01

Annals of Translational Medicine

Abstract:Background: To evaluate the use of the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) tool to promote the diagnosis/treatment ability and quality of the endocrinology department under the new policy of grouping payment-related to disease diagnosis.Methods: We compared the income structure of the endocrinology department in a 3a general hospital between the first half of 2019 and the same period in 2021. We also observed the changes in cost efficiency indexes (CEIs), time efficiency indexes (TEIs), case-mix index (CMI), number of DRGs, risk weight (RW) proportion, and surgery number in the inpatient department. Furthermore, the distribution of inpatients with diabetes of the whole hospital and the improvement of treatment efficiency indexes of the sub-specialty department were analyzed.Results: In the first half of 2021, compared with the same period of 2019, the total revenue of the endocrinology department decreased by 20.05%, the average hospitalization cost decreased by 11.72%, the CEI decreased from 1.31 to 1.06, and the TEI decreased from 0.74 to 0.64. Additionally, the number of DRGs increased from 162 to 176, the average CMI value increased from 0.80 to 0.84, and the proportion of RW 1-5 cases increased. Moreover, the number of surgical cases increased by 60.50%, minimally invasive surgery increased by 53.54%, grade 4 surgery increased by 66.67%, and the proportion of entering the clinical pathway increased from 77.76% to 86.64%. From May to August, 2021, the admission rate of endocrinology sub-specialty increased significantly, the number of DRGs showed an increasing trend, and the CEI and TEI decreased significantly. In the first half of 2021, inpatients with diabetes in the departments of rehabilitation, neurology, nephropathy, ophthalmology, and general administration accounted for 21.99-38.54%.Conclusions: The DRGs tool can be used to improve the clinical diagnosis and treatment ability of the endocrinology department, as well as optimize the CEI, TEI, CMI, and RW values. It is an effective way to promote the development of the endocrinology department under the new DRGs payment policy, carry out blood glucose management in the hospital, build endocrinology sub-specialties, and improve surgical and operation capacity.

oncology,medicine, research & experimental
The impacts of DRG-based payments on health care provider behaviors under a universal coverage system: A population-based study

Shou-Hsia Cheng,Chi-Chen Chen,Shu-Ling Tsai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.03.021

IF: 3.255

2012-10-01

Health Policy

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To examine the impacts of diagnosis-related group (DRG) payments on health care provider's behavior under a universal coverage system in Taiwan.METHODS: This study employed a population-based natural experiment study design. Patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, which were incorporated in the Taiwan version of DRG payments in 2010, were defined as the intervention group. The comparison group consisted of patients who underwent cardiovascular procedures which were paid for by fee-for-services schemes and were selected by propensity score matching from patients treated by the same group of surgeons. The generalized estimating equations model and difference-in-difference analysis was used in this study.RESULTS: The introduction of DRG payment resulted in a 10% decrease (p<0.001) in patient's length of stay in the intervention group in relation to the comparison group. The intensity of care slightly declined with p<0.001. No significant changes were found concerning health care outcomes measured by emergency department visits, readmissions, and mortality after discharge.CONCLUSION: The DRG-based payment resulted in reduced intensity of care and shortened length of stay. The findings might be valuable to other countries that are developing or reforming their payment system under a universal coverage system.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Impacts of DRG-Based Prepayment Reform on the Cost and Quality of Patients with Neurologic Disorders: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Analysis in Beijing, China

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s458005

2024-06-12

Risk Management and Healthcare Policy

Abstract:Zhen Cao, 1 Xiaoyu Liu, 2 Xiangzhen Wang, 3 Moning Guo, 4 Zhongjun Guan 1, 5 1 School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 2 School of Statistics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 3 School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 4 Beijing Municipal Health Big Data and Policy Research Center, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 5 Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Moning Guo, Beijing Municipal Health Big Data and Policy Research Center, No. 277, Zhao Dengyu Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China, Email Zhongjun Guan, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119, South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China, Email Purpose: As one of the pioneering pilot cities in China's extensive Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) -based prepayment reform, Beijing is leading a comprehensive overhaul of the prepayment system, encompassing hospitals of varying affiliations and tiers. This systematic transformation is rooted in extensive patient group data, with the commencement of actual payments on March 15, 2022. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of DRG payment reform by examining how it affects the cost, volume, and utilization of care for patients with neurological disorders. Patients and Methods: Utilizing the exogenous shock resulting from the implementation of the DRG-based prepayment system, we adopted the Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach to discern changes in outcome variables among DRG payment cases, in comparison to control cases, both before and following the enactment of the DRG policy. The analytical dataset was derived from patients diagnosed with neurological disorders across all hospitals in Beijing that underwent the DRG-based prepayment reform. Strict data inclusion and exclusion criteria, including reasonableness tests, were applied, defining the pre-reform timeframe as March 15th through October 31st, 2021, and the post-reform timeframe as the corresponding period in 2022. The extensive dataset encompassed 53 hospitals and encompassed hundreds of thousands of cases. Results: The implementation of DRG-based prepayment resulted in a substantial 12.6% decrease in total costs per case and a reduction of 0.96 days in length of stay. Additionally, the reform was correlated with significant reductions in overall in-hospital mortality and readmission rates. Surprisingly, the study unearthed unintended consequences, including a significant reduction in the proportion of inpatient cases classified as surgical patients and the Case Mix Index (CMI), indicating potential strategic adjustments by providers in response to the introduction of DRG payments. Conclusion: The DRG payment reform demonstrates substantial effects in restraining cost escalation and enhancing quality. Nevertheless, caution must be exercised to mitigate potential issues such as patient selection bias and upcoding. Keywords: diagnosis-related groups, payment reform, neurological disorders, DID, China Medical services, characterized by heightened technical intricacies and a diverse range of outputs, present challenges for straightforward comparisons. 1 To tackle this issue, the concept of "Case-mix" has emerged, entailing the categorization of patients according to specific characteristics, including clinical features, medical resource consumption, and other pertinent indicators. This approach enables direct comparisons among cases within the same group and facilitates comparisons across different groups through "risk adjustment". 2 Originating in the 1970s, DRG is among the various case mixes. It predominantly relies on diagnoses, considering treatment methods and patient demographic characteristics. DRG effectively categorizes medical services into distinct products, laying the groundwork for the formulation of payment standards. 3 In 1983, the United States of America implemented the DRG-based Prospective Payment System (DRG-PPS) for Medicare. This system establishes payment standards for each group through rigorous calculations based on DRG grouping, serving as a method for upfront payments to medical institutions. Widely adopted worldwide for inpatient charge settlements, this payment approach is perceived as a mechanism to incentivize medical service providers to improve efficiency and manage costs. 4 China stands among the early adopters of DRG. 5 Since 2009, the Chinese go -Abstract Truncated-

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Review of Diagnosis-Related Group-Based Financing of Hospital Care

Natasa Mihailovic,Sanja Kocic,Mihajlo Jakovljevic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392816647892

2016-01-01

Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology

Abstract:Since the 1990s, diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based payment systems were gradually introduced in many countries. The main design characteristics of a DRG-based payment system are an exhaustive patient case classification system (ie, the system of diagnosis-related groupings) and the payment formula, which is based on the base rate multiplied by a relative cost weight specific for each DRG. Cases within the same DRG code group are expected to undergo similar clinical evolution. Consecutively, they should incur the costs of diagnostics and treatment within a predefined scale. Such predictability was proven in a number of cost-of-illness studies conducted on major prosperity diseases alongside clinical trials on efficiency. This was the case with risky pregnancies, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, depression, alcohol addiction, hepatitis, and cancer. This article presents experience of introduced DRG-based payments in countries of western and eastern Europe, Scandinavia, United States, Canada, and Australia. This article presents the results of few selected reviews and systematic reviews of the following evidence: published reports on health system reforms by World Health Organization, World Bank, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Canadian Institute for Health Information, Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, and Centre for Health Economics University of York. Diverse payment systems have different strengths and weaknesses in relation to the various objectives. The advantages of the DRG payment system are reflected in the increased efficiency and transparency and reduced average length of stay. The disadvantage of DRG is creating financial incentives toward earlier hospital discharges. Occasionally, such polices are not in full accordance with the clinical benefit priorities.
Engrailed defines the position of dorsal di-mesencephalic boundary by repressing diencephalic fate.

I. Araki,H. Nakamura

IF: 6.8622

1999-11-15

Development

Abstract:Regionalization of a simple neural tube is a fundamental event during the development of central nervous system. To analyze in vivo the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of mesencephalon, we ectopically expressed Engrailed, which is expressed in developing mesencephalon, in the brain of chick embryos by in ovo electroporation. Misexpression of Engrailed caused a rostral shift of the di-mesencephalic boundary, and caused transformation of dorsal diencephalon into tectum, a derivative of dorsal mesencephalon. Ectopic Engrailed rapidly repressed Pax-6, a marker for diencephalon, which preceded the induction of mesencephalon-related genes such as Pax-2, Pax-5, Fgf8, Wnt-1 and EphrinA2. In contrast, a mutant Engrailed, En-2(F51rE), bearing mutation in EH1 domain, which has been shown to interact with a co-repressor, Groucho, did not show the phenotype induced by wild-type Engrailed. Furthermore, VP16-Engrailed chimeric protein, the dominant positive form of Engrailed, caused caudal shift of di-mesencephalic boundary and ectopic Pax-6 expression in mesencephalon. These data suggest that (1) Engrailed defines the position of dorsal di-mesencephalic boundary by directly repressing diencephalic fate, and (2) Engrailed positively regulates the expression of mesencephalon-related genes by repressing the expression of their negative regulator(s).
The Effect of Diagnosis-Related Group Payment System on Quality of Care in the Field of Obstetrics and Gynecology among Korean Tertiary Hospitals

Yong Wook Jung,Haeyong Pak,Inha Lee,Eui Hyeok Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2018.59.4.539

2018-01-01

Yonsei Medical Journal

Abstract:PURPOSE: To examine changes in clinical practice patterns following the introduction of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) under the fee-for-service payment system in July 2013 among Korean tertiary hospitals and to evaluate its effect on the quality of hospital care.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the 2012-2014 administrative database from National Health Insurance Service claim data, we reviewed medical information for 160400 patients who underwent cesarean sections (C-secs), hysterectomies, or adnexectomies at 43 tertiary hospitals. We compared changes in several variables, including length of stay, spillover, readmission rate, and the number of simultaneous and emergency operations, from before to after introduction of the DRGs.RESULTS: DRGs significantly reduced the length of stay of patients undergoing C-secs, hysterectomies, and adnexectomies (8.0±6.9 vs. 6.0±2.3 days, 7.4±3.5 vs. 6.4±2.7 days, 6.3±3.6 vs. 6.2±4.0 days, respectively, all p<0.001). Readmission rates decreased after introduction of DRGs (2.13% vs. 1.19% for C-secs, 4.51% vs. 3.05% for hysterectomies, 4.77% vs. 2.65% for adnexectomies, all p<0.001). Spillover rates did not change. Simultaneous surgeries, such as colpopexy and transobturator-tape procedures, during hysterectomies decreased, while colporrhaphy during hysterectomies and adnexectomies or myomectomies during C-secs did not change. The number of emergency operations for hysterectomies and adnexectomies decreased.CONCLUSION: Implementation of DRGs in the field of obstetrics and gynecology among Korean tertiary hospitals led to reductions in the length of stay without increasing outpatient visits and readmission rates. The number of simultaneous surgeries requiring expensive operative instruments and emergency operations decreased after introduction of the DRGs.

medicine, general & internal
Diagnosis Related Groups: Understanding Hospital Performance

Robert B. Fetter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.21.1.6

1991-02-01

Abstract:Diagnosis related groups (DRGs) were originally developed to provide product definitions for the output of hospitals. They can serve as a basis for budgeting, cost control, and quality control in hospitals. They were adopted by Medicare in 1983 to serve as a basis for a prospective payment system (PPS) for US hospitals. This system has resulted in savings of more than $50 billion in Medicare hospital payments through 1990 and extended the solvency of the Medicare Hospital Trust Fund well into the next century. Many other payers for hospital care have adopted DRG systems, including state Medicaid programs and private insurers, such as Blue Cross. More than 20 countries are currently developing or have adopted DRG-based systems for managing and financing hospital care.

management,operations research & management science
Diagnosis-Related Groups payment reform and hospital cost control

Ai-Ling Lin,Jian-Hua Hou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/thc-240110

IF: 1.6

2024-09-21

Technology and Health Care

Abstract:BACKGROUND: This study explores the influence of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) payment reform on hospital cost control and offers pertinent cost management strategies for public hospitals. It situates the research by elucidating the significance of the DRG payment method and comparing its advantages and drawbacks with the traditional 'pay per project' model. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim is to assess the impact of DRG payment reform on hospital cost control and propose effective cost management strategies for public hospitals. The objective is to provide insights into DRG payment implications and attempt practical recommendations for its implementation in the public healthcare sector. METHODS: Employing a comprehensive approach, the study analyzes DRG payment, delineates advantages and drawbacks, and proposes cost management strategies. Methods include staff training, an information management platform, disease analysis, and optimized cost accounting. The study highlights the potential for improved medical diagnosis and treatment through industry-finance integration. RESULTS: Findings reveal advantages and limitations of DRG payment, emphasizing strategies for optimizing hospital operations. Enhanced medical diagnosis and treatment procedures through industry-finance integration contribute to overall cost control effectiveness. CONCLUSION: The study serves as a practical guide for implementing DRG payment reforms, offering valuable insights for policymakers and healthcare professionals in navigating the complexities of cost control in public healthcare.

engineering, biomedical,health care sciences & services
Study on the cost-control effect of diagnosis-related groups based on meta-analysis

Xin Feng,Lulu Cheng,Hua Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039421

2024-09-13

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the effect of diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment method systematically before and after implementation in terms of average hospitalization day, cost and care quality. Method: Restricted the period from 2019 to May 31, 2023, we use 6 databases from CNKI, Wipu, Wanfang, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and web of science. With the related study, we extract the data about DRG, then we conducted meta-analysis of the data about length of stay (LOS) and cost by RevMan 5.4 and Stata 12.0 software. Care quality is in conjunction with literature reports. Result: About 24 articles were included, covering 2 indicators: average hospitalization expenses and days. Meta-analysis shows that implementing DRG payment method has an advantage in terms of average hospital stay (pooled effect: -1.13%, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.84, P = .00), and the difference is statistically significant. There is also an advantage in average hospitalization expenses (pooled effect: -2.58, 95% CI: -3.38 to -1.79, P = .00), and the difference is statistically significant. Conclusion: The use of DRG payment method can effectively reduce LOS and average hospitalization expenses. However, quality of care may decline with DRG adoption.
Empirical comparison of DRG variants using cardiovascular surgery data: initial results of a project at 18 German hospitals

N Roeder,B Rochell,C Juhra,M Mueller,Norbert Roeder,Bernhard Rochell,Christian Juhra,Marcel Mueller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/ah010057

2001-01-01

Australian Health Review

Abstract:In 2000, the responsibility for selecting a DRG variant for use in Germany was assigned to a body comprising representatives of hospitals and insurers called the Self-Administration Board (or Board in this paper). To help the Board, we applied cardiac surgery data from 18 German hospitals to eight different DRG variants. The error caused by bad coding quality could be minimized this way, since all diagnoses and procedures in cardiac surgery must be recorded for quality assurance purposes. To match the German code to the appropriate code required by the DRG variant, we created mapping tables whenever needed. As far as cardiac surgery is concerned, the Australian AR-DRG and the French GHM variants provided the best medical relevance, while the AR-DRG variant considered the level of severity better. Other variants would have to be updated to better reflect the level of medical complexity. Three main causes for wrong grouping could be identified for all systems: incomplete mapping, not enough reference to multidisciplinary treatments, and system construction problems.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
The effects of DRGs-based payment compared with cost-based payment on inpatient healthcare utilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhaolin Meng,Wen Hui,Yuanyi Cai,Jiazhou Liu,Huazhang Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.01.007

IF: 3.255

2020-04-01

Health Policy

Abstract:<p>Diagnosis related groups (DRGs)-based payment is increasingly used worldwide to control hospital costs instead of pre-existing cost-based payment, but the results of evaluations vary. A systematic analysis of the effects of DRGs-based payment is needed. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of DRGs-based payment and cost-based payment on inpatient health utilization in terms of length of stay (LOS), total inpatient spending per admission and readmission rates. We included studies undertaken with designs approved by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care that reported associations between DRGs-based payment and one or more inpatient healthcare utilization outcomes. After a systematic search of eight electronic databases through October 2018, 18 studies were identified and included in the review. We extracted data and conducted quality assessment, systematic synthesis and meta-analyses on the included studies. Random-effects models were used to handle substantial heterogeneity between studies. Meta-analysis showed that DRGs-based payment was associated with lower LOS (pooled effect: -8.07% [95%CI -13.05 to -3.10], p = 0.001), and higher readmission rates (pooled effect: 1.36% [95%CI 0.45 to 2.27], p = 0.003). This meta-analysis revealed that DRGs-based payment may have cost-saving implications by lowering LOS, whereas hardly reduce the readmission rates. Policy-makers considering adopting DRGs-based payment should pay more attention to the hospital readmission rates compared with cost-based payment.</p>

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Impact of Diagnosis-Related Groups on Inpatient Quality of Health Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ya-jing Chen,Xin-yu Zhang,Jia-qi Yan,Meng-cen Qian,Xiao-hua Ying

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580231167011

2023-01-01

Abstract:The aim of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of Diagnosis-related group (DRG) based payment on inpatient quality of care. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science from their inception to December 30, 2022. Included studies reported associations between DRGs-based payment and length of stay (LOS), re-admission within 30 days and mortality. Two reviewers screened the studies independently, extracted data of interest and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies. Stata 13.0 was used in the meta-analysis. A total of 29 studies with 36 214 219 enrolled patients were analyzed. Meta-analysis showed that DRG-based payment was effective in LOS decrease (pooled effect: SMD = -0.25, 95% CI = -0.37 to -0.12, Z = 3.81, P < .001), but showed no significant overall effect in re-admission within 30 days (RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.62-1.01, Z = 1.89, P = .058) and mortality (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.72-1.15, Z = 0.82, P = .411). DRG-based payment demonstrated statistically significant superiority over cost-based payment in terms of LOS reduction. However, owing to limitations in the quantity and quality of the included studies, an adequately powered study is necessary to consolidate these findings.
Trends in Diagnosis Related Groups for Inpatient Admissions and Associated Changes in Payment From 2012 to 2016

Ty J Gluckman,Kateri J Spinelli,Mansen Wang,Amir Yazdani,Gary Grunkemeier,Steven M Bradley,Jason H Wasfy,Abhinav Goyal,Andrew Oseran,Karen E Joynt Maddox

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28470

2020-12-01

Abstract:Importance: Hospitals are reimbursed based on Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs), which are defined, in part, by patients having 1 or more complications or comorbidities within a given DRG family. Hospitals have made substantial investment in efforts to document these complications and comorbidities. Objective: To examine temporal trends in DRGs with a major complication or comorbidity, compare these findings with 2 alternative measures of disease severity, and estimate associated changes in payment. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the all-payer National Inpatient Sample for admissions assigned to 1 of the top 20 reimbursed DRG families at US acute care hospitals from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from July 10, 2018, to May 29, 2019. Exposures: Quarter year of hospitalization. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of DRGs with a major complication or comorbidity. Secondary outcomes were comorbidity scores, risk-adjusted mortality rates, and estimated payment. Changes in assigned DRGs, comorbidity scores, and risk-adjusted mortality rates were analyzed by linear regression. Payment changes were estimated for each DRG by calculating the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services weighted payment using 2012 and 2016 case mix and hospitalization counts. Results: Between 2012 and 2016, there were 62 167 976 hospitalizations for the 20 highest-reimbursed DRG families; the sample was 32.9% male and 66.8% White, with a median age of 57 years (interquartile range, 31-73 years). Within 15 of these DRG families (75%), the proportion of DRGs with a major complication or comorbidity increased significantly over time. Over the same period, comorbidity scores were largely stable, with a decrease in 6 DRG families (30%), no change in 10 (50%), and an increase in 4 (20%). Among 19 DRG families with a calculable mortality rate, the risk-adjusted mortality rate significantly decreased in 8 (42%), did not change in 9 (47%), and increased in 2 (11%). The observed DRG shifts were associated with at least $1.2 billion in increased payment. Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, between 2012 and 2016, the proportion of admissions assigned to a DRG with major complication or comorbidity increased for 15 of the top 20 reimbursed DRG families. This change was not accompanied by commensurate increases in disease severity but was associated with increased payment.

[RADIATION-PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF AET IN RADIATION-INDUCED DOMINANT LETHAL MUTATION IN MICE].

The Impact of a Pilot Reform on the Diagnosis-Related-groups Payment System in China: a Difference-in-difference Study

Impact of precoding on reimbursement in diagnosis-related group systems: Randomized controlled trial

Impact of Diagnosis-Related Group Payment System on the Variation in Hospitalization Expenditures: A Case-Control Study with a Propensity-Score-Matched Control Group

Effect of diagnosis related groups implementation on the intensive care unit of a Swiss tertiary hospital: a cohort study

A scoping review of empirical evidence on the impacts of the DRG introduction in Germany and Switzerland

A physician-led initiative to improve clinical documentation results in improved health care documentation, case mix index, and increased contribution margin

Introducing Diagnosis-Related Groups: is the Information System Ready?

Improving the clinical ability and quality of endocrinology department with diagnosis-related groups tool

The impacts of DRG-based payments on health care provider behaviors under a universal coverage system: A population-based study

Impacts of DRG-Based Prepayment Reform on the Cost and Quality of Patients with Neurologic Disorders: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Analysis in Beijing, China

Review of Diagnosis-Related Group-Based Financing of Hospital Care

Engrailed defines the position of dorsal di-mesencephalic boundary by repressing diencephalic fate.

The Effect of Diagnosis-Related Group Payment System on Quality of Care in the Field of Obstetrics and Gynecology among Korean Tertiary Hospitals

Diagnosis Related Groups: Understanding Hospital Performance

Diagnosis-Related Groups payment reform and hospital cost control

Study on the cost-control effect of diagnosis-related groups based on meta-analysis

Empirical comparison of DRG variants using cardiovascular surgery data: initial results of a project at 18 German hospitals

The effects of DRGs-based payment compared with cost-based payment on inpatient healthcare utilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Impact of Diagnosis-Related Groups on Inpatient Quality of Health Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Trends in Diagnosis Related Groups for Inpatient Admissions and Associated Changes in Payment From 2012 to 2016