Abstract:Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, the most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG), can be reduced by CO2 capture and storage (CCS). This strategy is applicable to many large stationary sources including power generation plants, oil and gas refinery, cement production and other industrial sectors generating large point source of CO2. While the technology for CCS is currently available, significant improvements are needed to enhance confidence in storage security. In 1996, the first CCS project established for the purpose of mitigation of CO2 emission began injecting CO2 into deep geological formation in offshore aquifer in the North Sea, Norway. Since that time, science has advanced in areas such as geophysics, chemical engineering, monitoring and verification, and other areas, while also governments have funded demonstration projects at various sizes ranging from small-scale proof of concept to industrial-scale demonstration projects. Five industrial-scale CCS projects are currently operational globally with more than 0.035 Pg of CO2 captured and stored since 1996. Observations from these industrial scale projects and commercial CO2enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR), engineered natural analogues as well as theoretical consideration, models and laboratory studies have suggested that appropriately selected and well managed CCS sites are likely to retain almost all of injected CO2 for long time and provide the benefits for the intended purpose of CCS. However, CCS is still struggling to gain foothold as one of the main options for mitigating climate change due to high costs, advances in other options including renewable energy, as well as discovery of shale natural gas and the associated hydrological fracturing extraction techniques, absence of international action by governments and private sectors on climate change, economic crisis-induced low carbon (C) prices, and public skepticism. The estimated costs for CCS varies widely depending on the application—such as gas clean-up versus electricity generation, type of fuel, capture technology, and assumptions about the baseline technology. Generally, for current technology, CCS would increase cost of generating electricity by 50–100%, and parasitic energy requirement of 15–30%. In this case, capital costs and energy requirements are the major cost drivers. In addition, significant scale-up compared to existing CCS activities will be needed to achieve intended large reductions of CO2 emissions. For example, a 5- to 10-fold scale-up in the size of individual projects is needed to capture and store emissions from a typical coal-fired power plant of 500–1000 MW, while a thousand-fold scale-up in size of current CCS enterprise would be needed to reduce emissions by 1 Pg C yr−1. The estimated global oil and gas reservoirs are 1000 Pg CO2, saline aquifers global potential capacity ranges from 4000 to 23,000 Pg CO2. However, there is considerable debate about how much storage capacity actually exists and is available for CCS, particularly in saline aquifers. Research, improved geological assessments and commercial scale demonstration projects will be needed to verify the estimated capacity and improve confidence in storage capacity estimates.

A proposed global layout of carbon capture and storage in line with a 2 °C climate target

The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5C

Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology and Some Suggestions

Optimization-based approach for CO2 utilization in carbon capture, utilization and storage supply chain

Impact of Carbon Tax on CCUS Source-Sink Matching: Finding from the Improved ChinaCCS DSS

A cost-effective and reliable pipelines layout of carbon capture and storage for achieving China's carbon neutrality target

An Optimization Model for Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage Supply Chain: A Case Study in Northeastern China

Economic costs and environmental benefits of deploying CCUS supply chains at scale: Insights from the source–sink matching LCA–MILP approach

A national-scale high-resolution CCUS-shared pipeline layout for retrofitting multisectoral plants via onshore-offshore geological storage

Source-sink matching and cost analysis of offshore carbon capture, utilization, and storage in China

The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5°C

Optimal CCUS Supply Chain toward Carbon Neutrality: Novel Framework for Thermal Power, Iron-Steel, and Cement Sectors

China's multi-sector-shared CCUS networks in a carbon-neutral vision

Economic and Environmental Optimisation Framework for Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage Supply Chain

Cost assessment and potential evaluation of geologic carbon storage in China based on least-cost path analysis

The Prospects of Carbon Capture and Storage in China’s Power Sector under the 2 °C Target: A Component-based Learning Curve Approach

The contribution of carbon capture and storage to Canada's net-zero plan

Shared CO2 capture, transport, and storage for decarbonizing industrial clusters

Carbon capture and storage: History and the road ahead

CO2 dynamic mass balance of low permeability reservoir based on "four regions"

Carbon Capture and Storage in Geologic Formations