Abstract:Biomass pyrolysis is typically modeled based on the three reference components cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Most models rely on an individual decomposition of the materials and a linear superposition of the individual component products weighted by the present mass fractions. Models of varying complexity exist for the mathematical description of the pyrolysis process, ranging from the simplest single first-order (SFOR) model and the multi-step CRECK model to the chemical percolation devolatilization (CPD) model representing the molecular network of the solid. The models differ not only in their complexity but also in the used data for initial parameter calibration — thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) data for the CRECK model and mainly entrained flow, fluidized bed, or wire mesh reactor data for the Bio-CPD model. Within the present study, the predictive performance of these three models is compared with regard to the time-dependent total volatile release and the final volatile yield when applying two different thermal boundary conditions: low heating rate in a TGA and flash pyrolysis conditions realized with a small-scale fluidized bed reactor (FBR). The models are compared with one other and with experimental data on extracted, separately pyrolyzed biomass components to examine under which conditions reliable predictions can be made and when the trustability is limited. For the TGA data, the CRECK model has the closest proximity to the experimental measurements, also resolving most of the individual reactions, while the SFOR model can resolve only one globally dominating reaction, and the Bio-CPD model strongly overpredicts the reactivity of the biomass components during the slow heat-up. Under flash pyrolysis conditions in the FBR, by contrast, the Bio-CPD model predictions are closest to the experimental results when it comes to predicting the total volatile release rate. However, examining the integrally released yields, the CRECK model is closer to the experiments. Regarding the tar and light gas distribution, all models strongly overpredict tar from primary pyrolysis compared to the experimental results, indicating the presence of secondary gas-phase reactions in the FBR. Although different secondary gas-phase reaction models are used, the tar yield is significantly overestimated by the models compared to the experimental data.

Pyrolysis modeling of biomass: study of reaction yields using a single-particle model

Simulation of Biomass Pyrolysis in a Rotary Drum by Coupling CFD-DEM with a One-Dimensional Thermally Thick Model

New Pyrolysis Model for Biomass Particles in a Thermally Thick Regime

Numerical Investigation of Biomass Pyrolysis Performance in a Fluidized-Bed Reactor by a TFM-DEM Hybrid Model

Comparative analysis of pyrolysis models including SFOR, CRECK, and Bio-CPD to predict reaction kinetics and products from extracted biomass components

High-Resolution Particle-Scale Simulation of Biomass Pyrolysis

Modelling and experimental verification of physical and chemical processes during pyrolysis of a large biomass particle

Impact of particle-scale models on CFD-DEM simulations of biomass pyrolysis

Numerical Simulation and Multi-Process Coupling Analysis for Biomass Pyrolysis Fluidized Bed Reactor Based on Synergistic Effects Between Biomass and Nitrogen Inlet Modes

Modelling the Combustion of Thermally Thick Biomass Particles

Multiscale CFD Modeling of High-Temperature Biomass Pyrolysis with an Intraparticle Particle Model and Detailed Pyrolysis Kinetics

CFD-DEM Simulation of Biomass Pyrolysis in Fluidized-Bed Reactor with a Multistep Kinetic Scheme

Modelling intra-particle phenomena of biomass pyrolysis

Development and Comparison of Thermodynamic Equilibrium and Kinetic Approaches for Biomass Pyrolysis Modeling

Overview of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Reactor-Scale Biomass Pyrolysis

Effect of Operating Parameters on Agricultural Biomass Mixture Pyrolysis Process in a Batch Reactor

Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetic modeling of the pyrolysis of different biomass types by means of model-fitting, model-free and network modeling approaches

Effect of particle characteristics, kinetics and transport phenomena on the prediction of particle mass loss and products yields during biomass fast pyrolysis

A comprehensive pyrolysis model for lignocellulosic biomass particles with a special emphasis on the anisotropic characteristics

Two-Stage Global Biomass Pyrolysis Model for Combustion Applications: Predicting Product Composition with a Focus on Kinetics, Energy, and Mass Balances Consistency

Pyrolysis Simulation of Thermally Thick Biomass Particles Based on a Multistep Kinetic Scheme