Social media study of public opinions on potential COVID-19 vaccines: informing dissent, disparities, and dissemination

Hanjia Lyu,Junda Wang,Wei Wu,Viet Duong,Xiyang Zhang,Timothy D Dye,Jiebo Luo,Timothy D. Dye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imed.2021.08.001
2022-02-01
Intelligent Medicine
Abstract:<b>Background</b> The current development of vaccines for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is unprecedented. Little is known, however, about the nuanced public opinions on the vaccines on social media. <b>Methods</b> We adopted a human-guided machine learning framework using more than six million tweets from almost two million unique Twitter users to capture public opinions on the vaccines for SARS-CoV-2, classifying them into three groups: pro-vaccine, vaccine-hesitant, and anti-vaccine. After feature inference and opinion mining, 10,945 unique Twitter users were included in the study population. Multinomial logistic regression and counterfactual analysis were conducted. <b>Results</b> Socioeconomically disadvantaged groups were more likely to hold polarized opinions on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, either pro-vaccine ( <math><mrow><mi>B</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.40</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>SE</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.08</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>OR</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.49</mn> <mo>;</mo> <mn>95</mn> <mo>%</mo> <mi>CI</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.26</mn> <mtext>--</mtext> <mn>1.75</mn></mrow> </math> ) or anti-vaccine ( <math><mrow><mi>B</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.52</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>SE</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.06</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mspace></mspace> <mi>P</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>OR</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.69</mn> <mo>;</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mn>95</mn> <mo>%</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>CI</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.49</mn> <mtext>--</mtext> <mn>1.91</mn></mrow> </math> ). People who have the worst personal pandemic experience were more likely to hold the anti-vaccine opinion ( <math><mrow><mi>B</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mn>0.18</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>SE</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.04</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>P</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>OR</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.84</mn> <mo>;</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mn>95</mn> <mo>%</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>CI</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.77</mn> <mtext>--</mtext> <mn>0.90</mn></mrow> </math> ). The United States public is most concerned about the safety, effectiveness, and political issues regarding vaccines for COVID-19, and improving personal pandemic experience increases the vaccine acceptance level. <b>Conclusion</b> Opinion on COVID-19 vaccine uptake varies across people of different characteristics.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?