Characterization of lambdatrp-transducing bacteriophages made in vitro.

A. Hopkins,N. Murray,W. J. Brammar

IF: 6.151

Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Sentiment analysis and topic modeling for COVID-19 vaccine discussions

Hui Yin,Xiangyu Song,Shuiqiao Yang,Jianxin Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-022-01029-y

World Wide Web

Abstract:The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been ongoing for almost two years and has had an unprecedented impact on the daily lives of people around the world. More recently, the emergence of the Delta variant of COVID-19 has once again put the world at risk. Fortunately, many countries and companies have developed vaccines for the coronavirus. As of 23 August 2021, more than 20 vaccines have been approved by the World Health Organization (WHO), bringing light to people besieged by the pandemic. The global rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine has sparked much discussion on social media platforms, such as the effectiveness and safety of the vaccine. However, there has not been much systematic analysis of public opinion on the COVID-19 vaccine. In this study, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the discussions related to the COVID-19 vaccine on Twitter. We analyze the hot topics discussed by people and the corresponding emotional polarity from the perspective of countries and vaccine brands. The results show that most people trust the effectiveness of vaccines and are willing to get vaccinated. In contrast, negative tweets tended to be associated with news reports of post-vaccination deaths, vaccine shortages, and post-injection side effects. Overall, this study uses popular Natural Language Processing (NLP) technologies to mine people's opinions on the COVID-19 vaccine on social media and objectively analyze and visualize them. Our findings can improve the readability of the confusing information on social media platforms and provide effective data support for the government and policy makers.
Insight from NLP Analysis: COVID-19 Vaccines Sentiments on Social Media

Tao Na,Wei Cheng,Dongming Li,Wanyu Lu,Hongjiang Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.04081

2021-06-08

Computation and Language

Abstract:Social media is an appropriate source for analyzing public attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccine and various brands. Nevertheless, there are few relevant studies. In the research, we collected tweet posts by the UK and US residents from the Twitter API during the pandemic and designed experiments to answer three main questions concerning vaccination. To get the dominant sentiment of the civics, we performed sentiment analysis by VADER and proposed a new method that can count the individual's influence. This allows us to go a step further in sentiment analysis and explain some of the fluctuations in the data changing. The results indicated that celebrities could lead the opinion shift on social media in vaccination progress. Moreover, at the peak, nearly 40\% of the population in both countries have a negative attitude towards COVID-19 vaccines. Besides, we investigated how people's opinions toward different vaccine brands are. We found that the Pfizer vaccine enjoys the most popular among people. By applying the sentiment analysis tool, we discovered most people hold positive views toward the COVID-19 vaccine manufactured by most brands. In the end, we carried out topic modelling by using the LDA model. We found residents in the two countries are willing to share their views and feelings concerning the vaccine. Several death cases have occurred after vaccination. Due to these negative events, US residents are more worried about the side effects and safety of the vaccine.
Revealing Public Opinion Towards COVID-19 Vaccines With Twitter Data in the United States: Spatiotemporal Perspective

Tao Hu,Siqin Wang,Wei Luo,Mengxi Zhang,Xiao Huang,Yingwei Yan,Regina Liu,Kelly Ly,Viraj Kacker,Bing She,Zhenlong Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/30854

2021-09-10

Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed a large, initially uncontrollable, public health crisis both in the United States and across the world, with experts looking to vaccines as the ultimate mechanism of defense. The development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been rapidly advancing via global efforts. Hence, it is crucial for governments, public health officials, and policy makers to understand public attitudes and opinions towards vaccines, such that effective interventions and educational campaigns can be designed to promote vaccine acceptance. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate public opinion and perception on COVID-19 vaccines in the United States. We investigated the spatiotemporal trends of public sentiment and emotion towards COVID-19 vaccines and analyzed how such trends relate to popular topics found on Twitter. Methods: We collected over 300,000 geotagged tweets in the United States from March 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021. We examined the spatiotemporal patterns of public sentiment and emotion over time at both national and state scales and identified 3 phases along the pandemic timeline with sharp changes in public sentiment and emotion. Using sentiment analysis, emotion analysis (with cloud mapping of keywords), and topic modeling, we further identified 11 key events and major topics as the potential drivers to such changes. Results: An increasing trend in positive sentiment in conjunction with a decrease in negative sentiment were generally observed in most states, reflecting the rising confidence and anticipation of the public towards vaccines. The overall tendency of the 8 types of emotion implies that the public trusts and anticipates the vaccine. This is accompanied by a mixture of fear, sadness, and anger. Critical social or international events or announcements by political leaders and authorities may have potential impacts on public opinion towards vaccines. These factors help identify underlying themes and validate insights from the analysis. Conclusions: The analyses of near real-time social media big data benefit public health authorities by enabling them to monitor public attitudes and opinions towards vaccine-related information in a geo-aware manner, address the concerns of vaccine skeptics, and promote the confidence that individuals within a certain region or community have towards vaccines.
Public sentiment analysis and topic modeling regarding COVID-19 vaccines on the Reddit social media platform: A call to action for strengthening vaccine confidence

Chad A Melton,Olufunto A Olusanya,Nariman Ammar,Arash Shaban-Nejad,Chad A. Melton,Olufunto A. Olusanya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.08.010

IF: 7.537

2021-10-01

Journal of Infection and Public Health

Abstract:BackgroundThe COVID-19 outbreak fueled one of the most rapid vaccine developments in history. However, misinformation spread through online social media often leads to negative vaccine sentiment and hesitancy.MethodsTo investigate COVID-19 vaccine-related discussion in social media, we conducted a sentiment analysis and Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modeling on textual data collected from 13 Reddit communities focusing on the COVID-19 vaccine from Dec 1, 2020, to May 15, 2021. Data were aggregated and analyzed by month to detect changes in any sentiment and latent topics.ResultsPolarity analysis suggested these communities expressed more positive sentiment than negative regarding the vaccine-related discussions and has remained static over time. Topic modeling revealed community members mainly focused on side effects rather than outlandish conspiracy theories.ConclusionCovid-19 vaccine-related content from 13 subreddits show that the sentiments expressed in these communities are overall more positive than negative and have not meaningfully changed since December 2020. Keywords indicating vaccine hesitancy were detected throughout the LDA topic modeling. Public sentiment and topic modeling analysis regarding vaccines could facilitate the implementation of appropriate messaging, digital interventions, and new policies to promote vaccine confidence.

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
Topics in Antivax and Provax Discourse: Yearlong Synoptic Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets

Zainab Zaidi,Mengbin Ye,Fergus Samon,Abdisalan Jama,Binduja Gopalakrishnan,Chenhao Gu,Shanika Karunasekera,Jamie Evans,Yoshihisa Kashima

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/45069

2023-08-08

Abstract:Background: Developing an understanding of the public discourse on COVID-19 vaccination on social media is important not only for addressing the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic but also for future pathogen outbreaks. There are various research efforts in this domain, although, a need still exists for a comprehensive topic-wise analysis of tweets in favor of and against COVID-19 vaccines. Objective: This study characterizes the discussion points in favor of and against COVID-19 vaccines posted on Twitter during the first year of the pandemic. The aim of this study was primarily to contrast the views expressed by both camps, their respective activity patterns, and their correlation with vaccine-related events. A further aim was to gauge the genuineness of the concerns expressed in antivax tweets. Methods: We examined a Twitter data set containing 75 million English tweets discussing the COVID-19 vaccination from March 2020 to March 2021. We trained a stance detection algorithm using natural language processing techniques to classify tweets as antivax or provax and examined the main topics of discourse using topic modeling techniques. Results: Provax tweets (37 million) far outnumbered antivax tweets (10 million) and focused mostly on vaccine development, whereas antivax tweets covered a wide range of topics, including opposition to vaccine mandate and concerns about safety. Although some antivax tweets included genuine concerns, there was a large amount of falsehood. Both stances discussed many of the same topics from opposite viewpoints. Memes and jokes were among the most retweeted messages. Most tweets from both stances (9,007,481/10,566,679, 85.24% antivax and 24,463,708/37,044,507, 66.03% provax tweets) came from dual-stance users who posted both provax and antivax tweets during the observation period. Conclusions: This study is a comprehensive account of COVID-19 vaccine discourse in the English language on Twitter from March 2020 to March 2021. The broad range of discussion points covered almost the entire conversation, and their temporal dynamics revealed a significant correlation with COVID-19 vaccine-related events. We did not find any evidence of polarization and prevalence of antivax discourse over Twitter. However, targeted countering of falsehoods is important because only a small fraction of antivax discourse touched on a genuine issue. Future research should examine the role of memes and humor in driving web-based social media activity.
Examining the Prevailing Negative Sentiments Related to COVID-19 Vaccination: Unsupervised Deep Learning of Twitter Posts over a 16 Month Period

Qin Xiang Ng,Shu Rong Lim,Chun En Yau,Tau Ming Liew

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091457

2022-09-02

Abstract:Despite the demonstrated efficacy, safety, and availability of COVID-19 vaccines, efforts in global mass vaccination have been met with widespread scepticism and vaccine hesitancy or refusal. Understanding the reasons for the public's negative opinions towards COVID-19 vaccination using Twitter may help make new headways in improving vaccine uptake. This study, therefore, examined the prevailing negative sentiments towards COVID-19 vaccination via the analysis of public twitter posts over a 16 month period. Original tweets (in English) from 1 April 2021 to 1 August 2022 were extracted. A bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT)-based model was applied, and only negative sentiments tweets were selected. Topic modelling was used, followed by manual thematic analysis performed iteratively by the study investigators, with independent reviews of the topic labels and themes. A total of 4,448,314 tweets were analysed. The analysis generated six topics and three themes related to the prevailing negative sentiments towards COVID-19 vaccination. The themes could be broadly understood as either emotional reactions to perceived invidious policies or safety and effectiveness concerns related to the COVID-19 vaccines. The themes uncovered in the present infodemiology study fit well into the increasing vaccination model, and they highlight important public conversations to be had and potential avenues for future policy intervention and campaign efforts.
COVID-19 Vaccine and Social Media: Exploring Emotions and Discussions on Twitter

Amir Karami,Michael Zhu,Bailey Goldschmidt,Hannah R. Boyajieff,Mahdi M. Najafabadi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.04816

2021-07-29

Social and Information Networks

Abstract:The understanding of the public response to COVID-19 vaccines is the key success factor to control the COVID-19 pandemic. To understand the public response, there is a need to explore public opinion. Traditional surveys are expensive and time-consuming, address limited health topics, and obtain small-scale data. Twitter can provide a great opportunity to understand public opinion regarding COVID-19 vaccines. The current study proposes an approach using computational and human coding methods to collect and analyze a large number of tweets to provide a wider perspective on the COVID-19 vaccine. This study identifies the sentiment of tweets using a machine learning rule-based approach, discovers major topics, explores temporal trend and compares topics of negative and non-negative tweets using statistical tests, and discloses top topics of tweets having negative and non-negative sentiment. Our findings show that the negative sentiment regarding the COVID-19 vaccine had a decreasing trend between November 2020 and February 2021. We found Twitter users have discussed a wide range of topics from vaccination sites to the 2020 U.S. election between November 2020 and February 2021. The findings show that there was a significant difference between tweets having negative and non-negative sentiment regarding the weight of most topics. Our results also indicate that the negative and non-negative tweets had different topic priorities and focuses. This research illustrates that Twitter data can be used to explore public opinion regarding the COVID-19 vaccine.
A VISCOELASTIC BEM FOR MODELING OXIDATION

Thye-Lai Tung,J. Connor,D. Antoniadis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EB010310

1987-02-01

Abstract:A viscoelastic boundary element method has been developed to model the motion of silicon dioxide and silicon nitride during thermal oxidation of silicon. This technique uses Kelvin's solution reformulated according to the correspondence principle on viscoelasticity. Constant‐velocity loading is chosen to ensure smooth variations in displacement and stress behavior for a wide range of relaxation times.
Effect of progesterone on LH-releasing activity of the hypothalamus in non-laying hens primed with oestradiol.

M. Kawashima,M. Kamiyoshi,K. Tanaka,M. Hattori,K. Wakabayashi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/JRF.0.0630567

1981-11-01

Abstract:LH-releasing activity of the hypothalamus in non-laying hens following the injection of progesterone was increased in hens that had been treated with oestradiol 4 h earlier. Short-term priming with oestradiol may be effective in increasing the responsiveness of the hen hypothalamus to progesterone.
Formulation strategies for absorption windows.

S. Davis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03351-3

IF: 8.369

2005-02-15

Drug Discovery Today

Abstract:
Fine-tuned Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Social Media Data: Comparative Study

Chad A Melton,Brianna M White,Robert L Davis,Robert A Bednarczyk,Arash Shaban-Nejad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/40408

2022-10-17

Abstract:Background: The emergence of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and the necessary separation of populations have led to an unprecedented number of new social media users seeking information related to the pandemic. Currently, with an estimated 4.5 billion users worldwide, social media data offer an opportunity for near real-time analysis of large bodies of text related to disease outbreaks and vaccination. These analyses can be used by officials to develop appropriate public health messaging, digital interventions, educational materials, and policies. Objective: Our study investigated and compared public sentiment related to COVID-19 vaccines expressed on 2 popular social media platforms-Reddit and Twitter-harvested from January 1, 2020, to March 1, 2022. Methods: To accomplish this task, we created a fine-tuned DistilRoBERTa model to predict the sentiments of approximately 9.5 million tweets and 70 thousand Reddit comments. To fine-tune our model, our team manually labeled the sentiment of 3600 tweets and then augmented our data set through back-translation. Text sentiment for each social media platform was then classified with our fine-tuned model using Python programming language and the Hugging Face sentiment analysis pipeline. Results: Our results determined that the average sentiment expressed on Twitter was more negative (5,215,830/9,518,270, 54.8%) than positive, and the sentiment expressed on Reddit was more positive (42,316/67,962, 62.3%) than negative. Although the average sentiment was found to vary between these social media platforms, both platforms displayed similar behavior related to the sentiment shared at key vaccine-related developments during the pandemic. Conclusions: Considering this similar trend in shared sentiment demonstrated across social media platforms, Twitter and Reddit continue to be valuable data sources that public health officials can use to strengthen vaccine confidence and combat misinformation. As the spread of misinformation poses a range of psychological and psychosocial risks (anxiety and fear, etc), there is an urgency in understanding the public perspective and attitude toward shared falsities. Comprehensive educational delivery systems tailored to a population's expressed sentiments that facilitate digital literacy, health information-seeking behavior, and precision health promotion could aid in clarifying such misinformation.
The Impact of Public Health Events on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Chinese Social Media: National Infoveillance Study

Zizheng Zhang,Guanrui Feng,Jiahong Xu,Yimin Zhang,Jinhui Li,Jian Huang,Babatunde Akinwunmi,Casper J P Zhang,Wai-Kit Ming

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/32936

2021-11-09

Abstract:Background: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented challenges to every country worldwide. A call for global vaccination for COVID-19 plays a pivotal role in the fight against this virus. With the development of COVID-19 vaccines, public willingness to get vaccinated has become an important public health concern, considering the vaccine hesitancy observed worldwide. Social media is powerful in monitoring public attitudes and assess the dissemination, which would provide valuable information for policy makers. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the responses of vaccine positivity on social media when major public events (major outbreaks) or major adverse events related to vaccination (COVID-19 or other similar vaccines) were reported. Methods: A total of 340,783 vaccine-related posts were captured with the poster's information on Weibo, the largest social platform in China. After data cleaning, 156,223 posts were included in the subsequent analysis. Using pandas and SnowNLP Python libraries, posts were classified into 2 categories, positive and negative. After model training and sentiment analysis, the proportion of positive posts was computed to measure the public positivity toward the COVID-19 vaccine. Results: The positivity toward COVID-19 vaccines in China tends to fluctuate over time in the range of 45.7% to 77.0% and is intuitively correlated with public health events. In terms of gender, males were more positive (70.0% of the time) than females. In terms of region, when regional epidemics arose, not only the region with the epidemic and surrounding regions but also the whole country showed more positive attitudes to varying degrees. When the epidemic subsided temporarily, positivity decreased with varying degrees in each region. Conclusions: In China, public positivity toward COVID-19 vaccines fluctuates over time and a regional epidemic or news on social media may cause significant variations in willingness to accept a vaccine. Furthermore, public attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination vary from gender and region. It is crucial for policy makers to adjust their policies through the use of positive incentives with prompt responses to pandemic-related news to promote vaccination acceptance.
Sentiment analysis of the COVID-19 vaccine perception

Byeonghwa Park,In Suk Jang,Daehan Kwak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241236131

2024-02-26

Health Informatics Journal

Abstract:Health Informatics Journal, Volume 30, Issue 1, January-March 2024. The sharp rise in coronavirus cases in the United States, as well as other countries, is driven by variants such as the Omicron substrain, BA4 and BA5. Keeping up to date with COVID-19 vaccination and wearing masks are essential tools for mitigating the pandemic. Social media plays a vital role in sharing and exchanging information, but it also affects perceptions of social phenomena. In this study, we conducted sentiment analysis and topic modeling to investigate vaccine perception using 338,465 COVID-19 vaccine-related comments collected from January 2020 to May 2021 on Reddit. This study stands apart from prior COVID-related research on social media, particularly on Reddit, as it conducted separate analyses for each COVID vaccine and examines public sentiment with various societal events, including vaccine development progress and government responses to COVID. The findings reveal two notable spikes in the number of comments containing the keyword "vaccine". This suggests that discussions about vaccines tend to increase during times of significant social and political events, indicating that people's attention and interest in the topic are influenced by current events. Understanding the public perception of vaccines and identifying factors influencing vaccine perception could help propose appropriate interventions to promote vaccination.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
An analysis of vaccine-related sentiments from development to deployment of COVID-19 vaccines

Rohitash Chandra,Jayesh Sonawane,Janhavi Lande,Cathy Yu

2023-06-24

Abstract:Anti-vaccine sentiments have been well-known and reported throughout the history of viral outbreaks and vaccination programmes. The COVID-19 pandemic had fear and uncertainty about vaccines which has been well expressed on social media platforms such as Twitter. We analyse Twitter sentiments from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and study the public behaviour during the planning, development and deployment of vaccines expressed in tweets worldwide using a sentiment analysis framework via deep learning models. In this way, we provide visualisation and analysis of anti-vaccine sentiments over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results show a link between the number of tweets, the number of cases, and the change in sentiment polarity scores during major waves of COVID-19 cases. We also found that the first half of the pandemic had drastic changes in the sentiment polarity scores that later stabilised which implies that the vaccine rollout had an impact on the nature of discussions on social media.

Social and Information Networks,Computation and Language
Social media study of public opinions on potential COVID-19 vaccines: informing dissent, disparities, and dissemination

Hanjia Lyu,Junda Wang,Wei Wu,Viet Duong,Xiyang Zhang,Timothy D Dye,Jiebo Luo,Timothy D. Dye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imed.2021.08.001

2022-02-01

Intelligent Medicine

Abstract:Background The current development of vaccines for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is unprecedented. Little is known, however, about the nuanced public opinions on the vaccines on social media. Methods We adopted a human-guided machine learning framework using more than six million tweets from almost two million unique Twitter users to capture public opinions on the vaccines for SARS-CoV-2, classifying them into three groups: pro-vaccine, vaccine-hesitant, and anti-vaccine. After feature inference and opinion mining, 10,945 unique Twitter users were included in the study population. Multinomial logistic regression and counterfactual analysis were conducted. Results Socioeconomically disadvantaged groups were more likely to hold polarized opinions on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, either pro-vaccine ( <math><mrow><mi>B</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.40</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>SE</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.08</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>OR</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.49</mn> <mo>;</mo> <mn>95</mn> <mo>%</mo> <mi>CI</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.26</mn> <mtext>--</mtext> <mn>1.75</mn></mrow> </math> ) or anti-vaccine ( <math><mrow><mi>B</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.52</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>SE</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.06</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mspace></mspace> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>OR</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.69</mn> <mo>;</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mn>95</mn> <mo>%</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>CI</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.49</mn> <mtext>--</mtext> <mn>1.91</mn></mrow> </math> ). People who have the worst personal pandemic experience were more likely to hold the anti-vaccine opinion ( <math><mrow><mi>B</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mn>0.18</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>SE</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.04</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>P</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0.001</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>OR</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.84</mn> <mo>;</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mn>95</mn> <mo>%</mo> <mspace></mspace> <mi>CI</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.77</mn> <mtext>--</mtext> <mn>0.90</mn></mrow> </math> ). The United States public is most concerned about the safety, effectiveness, and political issues regarding vaccines for COVID-19, and improving personal pandemic experience increases the vaccine acceptance level. Conclusion Opinion on COVID-19 vaccine uptake varies across people of different characteristics.
Deep Learning Reveals Patterns of Diverse and Changing Sentiments Towards COVID-19 Vaccines Based on 11 Million Tweets

Hanyin Wang,Meghan R. Hutch,Yikuan Li,Adrienne S. Kline,Sebastian Otero,Leena B. Mithal,Emily S. Miller,Andrew Naidech,Yuan Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.10641

2022-07-05

Abstract:Over 12 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been administered at the time of writing. However, public perceptions of vaccines have been complex. We analyzed COVID-19 vaccine-related tweets to understand the evolving perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines. We finetuned a deep learning classifier using a state-of-the-art model, XLNet, to detect each tweet's sentiment automatically. We employed validated methods to extract the users' race or ethnicity, gender, age, and geographical locations from user profiles. Incorporating multiple data sources, we assessed the sentiment patterns among subpopulations and juxtaposed them against vaccine uptake data to unravel their interactive patterns. 11,211,672 COVID-19 vaccine-related tweets corresponding to 2,203,681 users over two years were analyzed. The finetuned model for sentiment classification yielded an accuracy of 0.92 on testing set. Users from various demographic groups demonstrated distinct patterns in sentiments towards COVID-19 vaccines. User sentiments became more positive over time, upon which we observed subsequent upswing in the population-level vaccine uptake. Surrounding dates where positive sentiments crest, we detected encouraging news or events regarding vaccine development and distribution. Positive sentiments in pregnancy-related tweets demonstrated a delayed pattern compared with trends in general population, with postponed vaccine uptake trends. Distinctive patterns across subpopulations suggest the need of tailored strategies. Global news and events profoundly involved in shaping users' thoughts on social media. Populations with additional concerns, such as pregnancy, demonstrated more substantial hesitancy since lack of timely recommendations. Feature analysis revealed hesitancies of various subpopulations stemmed from clinical trial logics, risks and complications, and urgency of scientific evidence.

Computation and Language,Machine Learning,Social and Information Networks
Vaccine Discourse on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Gabriel Lindelöf,Talayeh Aledavood,Barbara Keller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.11521

2022-07-23

Computers and Society

Abstract:Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines have been an important topic in public discourse. The discussions around vaccines are polarized as some see them as an important measure to end the pandemic, and others are hesitant or find them harmful. This study investigates posts related to COVID-19 vaccines on Twitter and focuses on those which have a negative stance toward vaccines. A dataset of 16,713,238 English tweets related to COVID-19 vaccines was collected covering the period from March 1, 2020, to July 31, 2021. We used the Scikit-learn Python library to apply a support vector machine (SVM) classifier to identify the tweets with a negative stance toward the COVID-19 vaccines. A total of 5,163 tweets were used to train the classifier, out of which a subset of 2,484 tweets were manually annotated by us and made publicly available. We used the BERTtopic model to extract and investigate the topics discussed within the negative tweets and how they changed over time. We show that the negativity with respect to COVID-19 vaccines has decreased over time along with the vaccine roll-outs. We identify 37 topics of discussion and present their respective importance over time. We show that popular topics consist of conspiratorial discussions such as 5G towers and microchips, but also contain legitimate concerns around vaccination safety and side effects as well as concerns about policies. Our study shows that even unpopular opinions or conspiracy theories can become widespread when paired with a widely popular discussion topic such as COVID-19 vaccines. Understanding the concerns and the discussed topics and how they change over time is essential for policymakers and public health authorities to provide better and in-time information and policies, to facilitate vaccination of the population in future similar crises.
Adverse Mentions, Negative Sentiment, and Emotions in COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets and Their Association with Vaccination Uptake: Global Comparison of 192 Countries

Jungmi Jun,Ali Zain,Yingying Chen,Sei-Hill Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050735

2022-05-09

Vaccines

Abstract:Background: Many countries show low COVID-19 vaccination rates despite high levels of readiness and delivery of vaccines. The public's misperceptions, hesitancy, and negative emotions toward vaccines are psychological factors discouraging vaccination. At the individual level, studies have revealed negative perceptual/behavioral outcomes of COVID-19 information exposure via social media where misinformation and vaccine fear flood. Objective: This study extends research context to the global level and investigates social media discourse on the COVID-19 vaccine and its association with vaccination rates of 192 countries in the world. Methods: COVID-19 vaccine tweets were compared by country in terms of (1) the number per million Twitter users, (2) mentions of adverse events—death, side-effects, blood clots, (3) negative sentiment (vs. positive), and (4) fear, sadness, or anger emotions (vs. joy). Artificial intelligence (AI) was adopted to classify sentiment and emotions. Such tweets and covariates (COVID-19 morbidity and mortality rates, GDP, population size and density, literacy rate, democracy index, institutional quality, human development index) were tested as predictors of vaccination rates in countries. Results: Over 21.3 million COVID-19 vaccine tweets posted between November 2020 and August 2021 worldwide were included in our analysis. The global average of COVID-19 vaccine tweets mentioning adverse events was 2% for 'death', 1.15% for 'side-effects', and 0.80% for 'blood clots'. Negative sentiment appeared 1.90 times more frequently than positive sentiment. Fear, anger, or sadness appeared 0.70 times less frequently than joy. The mention of 'side-effects' and fear/sadness/anger emotions appeared as significant predictors of vaccination rates, along with the human development index. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that global efforts to combat misinformation, address negative emotions, and promote positive languages surrounding COVID-19 vaccination on social media may help increase global vaccination uptakes.

immunology,medicine, research & experimental
Occupational contact allergic dermatitis in dentistry.

I. Mikov,I. Turkalj,M. Jovanović

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP1106523M

2011-06-01

Vojnosanitetski pregled

Abstract:INTRODUCTION Dental professionals may be at increased risk of developing occupational allergic diseases specially to methacrylates that can permeate protective disposable gloves. CASE REPORT We presented a case of occupational allergic contact dermatitis in a 28-year-old dental technician. The patient had complained of itching and cracking of fingers for 6 months. The dermatitis improved over weekends. Skin erythema and scaling were present with primarily involvement of the fingertips. Patch testing with dental series gave positive vesicular reaction to methyl methacrylate. Follow-up after 6 months of allergen avoidance showed a complete regression of dermatitis. CONCLUSION Methacrylates serve as bases for acrylic resins which are used in prosthetics. Methyl methacrylate as a small molecular acrylate can permeate thin protective disposable gloves. Using adequate personal protective equipment, like nitrile rubber gloves, is the most important preventive measure in this occupation. Health practitioners should recognize possible occupational hazards in dentistry and implement appropriate preventive measures to protect health of workers.
Public Discourse about COVID-19 Vaccinations: A Computational Analysis of the Relationship between Public Concerns and Policies

Katarina Boland,Christopher Starke,Felix Bensmann,Frank Marcinkowski,Stefan Dietze

2024-05-07

Abstract:Societies worldwide have witnessed growing rifts separating advocates and opponents of vaccinations and other COVID-19 countermeasures. With the rollout of vaccination campaigns, German-speaking regions exhibited much lower vaccination uptake than other European regions. While Austria, Germany, and Switzerland (the DACH region) caught up over time, it remains unclear which factors contributed to these changes. Scrutinizing public discourses can help shed light on the intricacies of vaccine hesitancy and inform policy-makers tasked with making far-reaching decisions: policies need to effectively curb the spread of the virus while respecting fundamental civic liberties and minimizing undesired consequences. This study draws on Twitter data to analyze the topics prevalent in the public discourse. It further maps the topics to different phases of the pandemic and policy changes to identify potential drivers of change in public attention. We use a hybrid pipeline to detect and analyze vaccination-related tweets using topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and a minimum of social scientific domain knowledge to analyze the discourse about vaccinations in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic in the DACH region. We show that skepticism regarding the severity of the COVID-19 virus and towards efficacy and safety of vaccines were among the prevalent topics in the discourse on Twitter but that the most attention was given to debating the theme of freedom and civic liberties. Especially during later phases of the pandemic, when implemented policies restricted the freedom of unvaccinated citizens, increased vaccination uptake could be observed. At the same time, increasingly negative and polarized sentiments emerge in the discourse. This suggests that these policies might have effectively attenuated vaccination hesitancy but were not successfully dispersing citizens' doubts and concerns.

Computers and Society,Social and Information Networks

Characterization of lambdatrp-transducing bacteriophages made in vitro.

Sentiment analysis and topic modeling for COVID-19 vaccine discussions

Insight from NLP Analysis: COVID-19 Vaccines Sentiments on Social Media

Revealing Public Opinion Towards COVID-19 Vaccines With Twitter Data in the United States: Spatiotemporal Perspective

Public sentiment analysis and topic modeling regarding COVID-19 vaccines on the Reddit social media platform: A call to action for strengthening vaccine confidence

Topics in Antivax and Provax Discourse: Yearlong Synoptic Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets

Examining the Prevailing Negative Sentiments Related to COVID-19 Vaccination: Unsupervised Deep Learning of Twitter Posts over a 16 Month Period

COVID-19 Vaccine and Social Media: Exploring Emotions and Discussions on Twitter

A VISCOELASTIC BEM FOR MODELING OXIDATION

Effect of progesterone on LH-releasing activity of the hypothalamus in non-laying hens primed with oestradiol.

Formulation strategies for absorption windows.

Fine-tuned Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Social Media Data: Comparative Study

The Impact of Public Health Events on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Chinese Social Media: National Infoveillance Study

Sentiment analysis of the COVID-19 vaccine perception

An analysis of vaccine-related sentiments from development to deployment of COVID-19 vaccines

Social media study of public opinions on potential COVID-19 vaccines: informing dissent, disparities, and dissemination

Deep Learning Reveals Patterns of Diverse and Changing Sentiments Towards COVID-19 Vaccines Based on 11 Million Tweets

Vaccine Discourse on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Adverse Mentions, Negative Sentiment, and Emotions in COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets and Their Association with Vaccination Uptake: Global Comparison of 192 Countries

Occupational contact allergic dermatitis in dentistry.

Public Discourse about COVID-19 Vaccinations: A Computational Analysis of the Relationship between Public Concerns and Policies