REST: a preoperative tailored sleep intervention for patients undergoing total knee replacement - feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial

Wendy Bertram,Chris Penfold,Joel Glynn,Emma Johnson,Amanda Burston,Dane Rayment,Nicholas Howells,Simon White,Vikki Wylde,Rachael Gooberman-Hill,Ashley Blom,Katie Whale
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078785
IF: 3.006
2024-03-21
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objectives To test the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a novel preoperative tailored sleep intervention for patients undergoing total knee replacement. Design Feasibility two-arm two-centre RCT using 1:1 randomisation with an embedded qualitative study. Setting Two National Health Service (NHS) secondary care hospitals in England and Wales. Participants Preoperative adult patients identified from total knee replacement waiting lists with disturbed sleep, defined as a score of 0–28 on the Sleep Condition Indicator questionnaire. Intervention The REST intervention is a preoperative tailored sleep assessment and behavioural intervention package delivered by an Extended Scope Practitioner (ESP), with a follow-up phone call 4 weeks postintervention. All participants received usual care as provided by the participating NHS hospitals. Outcome measures The primary aim was to assess the feasibility of conducting a full trial. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at baseline, 1-week presurgery, and 3 months postsurgery. Data collected to determine feasibility included the number of eligible patients, recruitment rates and intervention adherence. Qualitative work explored the acceptability of the study processes and intervention delivery through interviews with ESPs and patients. Results Screening packs were posted to 378 patients and 57 patients were randomised. Of those randomised, 20 had surgery within the study timelines. An appointment was attended by 25/28 (89%) of participants randomised to the intervention. Follow-up outcomes measures were completed by 40/57 (70%) of participants presurgery and 15/57 (26%) postsurgery. Where outcome measures were completed, data completion rates were 80% or higher for outcomes at all time points, apart from the painDETECT: 86% complete at baseline, 72% at presurgery and 67% postsurgery. Interviews indicated that most participants found the study processes and intervention acceptable. Conclusions This feasibility study has demonstrated that with some amendments to processes and design, an RCT to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the REST intervention is feasible. Trial registration number ISRCTN14233189.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to evaluate the feasibility and cost - effectiveness of a non - drug complex sleep intervention named REST in patients with total knee replacement (TKR). Specifically, the study attempts to address the following key questions: 1. **Feasibility**: Evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the clinical and cost - effectiveness of the REST intervention. This includes evaluating the patient recruitment rate, the acceptance and compliance of the intervention, and the integrity of data collection. 2. **Patient - reported outcomes**: Through questionnaires at baseline, one week before surgery and three months after surgery, evaluate the changes in patient - reported indicators such as joint pain, neuralgia, sleep quality, mental health and quality of life. 3. **Design and implementation of the intervention**: Evaluate whether the design of the REST intervention is reasonable and whether there are areas for improvement in the implementation process, especially the acceptance of the delivery method of the intervention (such as video conferencing or telephone). 4. **Economic evaluation**: Evaluate the feasibility of collecting economic data, including the cost of the intervention and resource usage, to support the economic evaluation of future comprehensive trials. 5. **Acceptance of randomisation**: Through qualitative interviews, understand patients' acceptance of the randomisation design and their overall feelings about participating in the study. In summary, the main objective of this study is to provide preliminary data and support for future RCTs to determine whether the REST intervention can effectively improve sleep quality and postoperative recovery in patients with total knee replacement, while evaluating its cost - effectiveness.