Clinical and cost-effectiveness of individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation after surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (RaCeR 2)

Bruno Mazuquin,Maria Moffatt,Alba Realpe,Rachelle Sherman,Katie Ireland,Zak Connan,Jack Tildsley,Andrea Manca,Vijay Singh,Nadine E Foster,Jonathan Rees,Steven Drew,Marcus Bateman,Apostolos Fakis,Malin Farnsworth,Chris Littlewood,Vijay Singh Gc
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081284
IF: 3.006
2024-04-06
BMJ Open
Abstract:Introduction Despite the high number of operations and surgical advancement, rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair has not progressed for over 20 years. The traditional cautious approach might be contributing to suboptimal outcomes. Our aim is to assess whether individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation results in less shoulder pain and disability at 12 weeks after surgical repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff compared with current standard (delayed) rehabilitation. Methods and analysis The rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair (RaCeR 2) study is a pragmatic multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial with internal pilot phase. It has a parallel group design with 1:1 allocation ratio, full health economic evaluation and quintet recruitment intervention. Adults awaiting arthroscopic surgical repair of a full-thickness tear are eligible to participate. On completion of surgery, 638 participants will be randomised. The intervention (individualised early patient-directed rehabilitation) includes advice to the patient to remove their sling as soon as they feel able, gradually begin using their arm as they feel able and a specific exercise programme. Sling removal and movement is progressed by the patient over time according to agreed goals and within their own pain and tolerance. The comparator (standard rehabilitation) includes advice to the patient to wear the sling for at least 4 weeks and only to remove while eating, washing, dressing or performing specific exercises. Progression is according to specific timeframes rather than as the patient feels able. The primary outcome measure is the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index total score at 12-week postrandomisation. The trial timeline is 56 months in total, from September 2022. Trial registration number ISRCTN11499185.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an individualized (early) patient-guided rehabilitation program compared to a standard rehabilitation program following rotator cuff surgery. Specifically, the study aims to verify through this multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial whether an individualized early patient-guided rehabilitation program can significantly reduce shoulder pain and disability at 12 weeks post-surgery. The study design includes an internal pilot phase to explore and overcome recruitment barriers and employs a parallel group design, with participants allocated in a 1:1 ratio to two different intervention groups. The primary outcome measure is shoulder pain and disability at 12 weeks post-randomization, assessed using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) total score. Additionally, the study includes long-term follow-up of shoulder pain and disability (at 6 and 12 months post-surgery), quality of life assessments, time to return to normal activities (including work and driving), further use of medical resources, repair integrity, and adverse events as secondary outcome measures. To achieve these goals, the study plans to recruit approximately 638 participants and will use a method called the "Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI)" to optimize the recruitment process. The study will also evaluate the effects of the two different rehabilitation programs by analyzing participants' self-reported data and ultrasound examination results. In summary, the question this paper seeks to address is: Is an individualized early patient-guided rehabilitation program more effective and cost-efficient than the existing standard rehabilitation program?