Abstract:Problem definition: This paper explores the impact of competition between platforms in the sharing economy. Examples include the cases of Uber and Lyft in the context of ride-sharing platforms. In particular, we consider competition between two platforms that offer a common service (e.g., rides) through a set of independent service providers (e.g., drivers) to a market of customers. Each platform sets a price that is charged to customers for obtaining service provided by a driver. A portion of that price is paid to the driver that delivers the service. Both customers’ and drivers’ utilities are sensitive to the payment terms set by the platform and are also sensitive to congestion in the system (given by the relative number of customers and drivers in the market). We consider two possible settings. The first one, termed “single-homing,” assumes that drivers work through a single platform. In the second setting, termed “multi-homing” (or “multi-apping” as it is known in practice), drivers deliver service through both platforms. Academic/Practical Relevance: This is one of the first papers to study competition and multi-homing in the presence of congestion effects typically observed in the sharing economy. We leverage the model to study some practical questions that have received significant press attention (and stirred some controversies) in the ride-sharing industry. The first involves the issue of surge pricing. The second involves the increasingly common practice of drivers choosing to operate on multiple platforms (multi-homing). Methodology: We formulate our problem as a pricing game between two platforms and employ the concept of Nash equilibrium to analyze equilibrium outcomes in various settings. Results: In both the single-homing and multi-homing settings, we study the equilibrium prices that emerge from the competitive interaction between the platforms and explore the supply and demand outcomes that can arise at equilibrium. We build on these equilibrium results to study the impact of surge pricing in response to a surge in demand and to examine the incentives at play when drivers engage in multi-homing. Managerial Implications: We find that raising prices in response to a surge in demand makes drivers and customers better off than if platforms were constrained to charge the same prices that would arise under normal demand levels. We also compare drivers’ and customers’ performance when all drivers either single-home or all multi-home. We find that, while individual drivers may have an incentive to multi-home, all players are worse off when all drivers multi-home. We conclude by proposing an incentive mechanism to discourage multi-homing.

Competition in Electric Autonomous Mobility on Demand Systems

Modeling and Managing Mixed On-Demand Ride Services of Human-Driven Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles

Dynamic Optimization Strategies for On-Demand Ride Services Platform: Surge Pricing, Commission Rate, and Incentives

Modeling Morning Commute Problem with Real-Time Ridesharing Services

Simulating On-Demand Ride Services in a Manhattan-like Urban Network Considering Traffic Dynamics

Coordinating Supply and Demand in Ride-Sourcing Markets with Pre-Assigned Pooling Service and Traffic Congestion Externality

Modeling Network Equilibrium of Competitive Ride-Sourcing Market with Heterogeneous Transportation Network Companies

Modeling and Regulating a Ride-Sourcing Market Integrated with Vehicle Rental Services

On the needs for MaaS platforms to handle competition in ridesharing mobility

A Balancing Act of Regulating On-Demand Ride Services

Competition Between Two-Sided Platforms Under Demand and Supply Congestion Effects

Pricing in Ride-sharing Markets : Effects of network competition and autonomous vehicles

Competition and evolution in ride-hailing market: A dynamic duopoly game model

Ride-Hailing Platforms: Competition and Autonomous Vehicles

Competition and Cooperation of Autonomous Ridepooling Services: Game-Based Simulation of a Broker Concept

A two-period game-theoretical model for heterogeneous ride-sourcing platforms with asymmetric competition and mixed fleets

Do Workers and Customers Benefit from Competition Between On-Demand Service Platforms?

On the interplay between pricing, competition and QoS in ride-hailing

Pricing, competition and market segmentation in ride hailing

Optimal Spatial Pricing for an On-demand Ride-sourcing Service Platform

Competition of Ride-Hailing Platforms in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles: Heavy or Light Asset?