Comparing the Extraction Performance in Mouse Plasma of Different Biphasic Methods for Polar and Nonpolar Compounds

Friederike Gutmann,Raphaela Fritsche-Guenther,Daniela B. Dias,Jennifer A. Kirwan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00596

2024-02-06

Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract:Many metabolomic studies are interested in both polar and nonpolar analyses. However, the available sample volume often precludes multiple separate extractions. Therefore, there are major advantages in performing a biphasic extraction and retaining both phases for subsequent separate analyses. To be successful, such approaches require the method to be robust and repeatable for both phases. Hence, we determined the performance of three extraction protocols, plus two variant versions, using 25 μL of commercially available mouse plasma. The preferred option for nonpolar lipids was a modified diluted version of a method employing methyl <i>tert</i>-butyl ether (MTBE) suggested by Matyash and colleagues due to its high repeatability for nonpolar compounds. For polar compounds, the Bligh-Dyer method performs best for sensitivity but with consequentially poorer lipid performance. Overall, the scaled-down version of the MTBE method gave the best overall performance, with high sensitivity for both polar and nonpolar compounds and good repeatability for polar compounds in particular.

biochemical research methods

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to address the issue of how to efficiently extract both polar and non-polar compounds from a limited volume of biological samples in metabolomics research. Specifically, the researchers aim to find a biphasic extraction method that can simultaneously extract polar and non-polar compounds from 25 microliters of mouse plasma, with high reproducibility and sensitivity.

### Background
In metabolomics research, metabolites and lipids in biological samples cover a wide range of physicochemical properties. Particularly for lipid analysis, different solvents and analytical methods are usually required to extract and optimize the detection of certain lipid classes, which differ from the methods used for polar metabolite extraction. Due to the often limited sample volume in medical research, especially in rodent or repeated sampling studies, the number of separate analyses that can be performed is restricted. Therefore, developing a biphasic extraction method that can simultaneously extract both polar and non-polar compounds is especially important.

### Research Objective
This paper aims to compare the extraction performance of different biphasic extraction methods in 25 microliters of commercial mouse plasma, evaluating their performance in extracting polar and non-polar compounds to find the method with the best overall performance.

### Methods
The researchers compared five different biphasic extraction methods:
1. **Bligh-Dyer Method**: A traditional biphasic extraction method using a chloroform/methanol/water (2/2/1.8, v/v/v) system.
2. **Modified Matyash Method**: Using a methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)/methanol/water (2.6/2.0/2.4, v/v/v) system.
3. **Diluted Matyash Method**: Also using an MTBE/methanol/water (2.6/2.0/2.4, v/v/v) system, but with diluted samples.
4. **Lipidyzer Method**: A proprietary FIA lipid analysis method provided by SCIEX, using a dichloromethane/methanol (DCM/MeOH) system.
5. **Modified Lipidyzer Method**: Using MTBE instead of DCM, with one or two extractions.

### Results
- **Polar Metabolite Extraction**: The Bligh-Dyer method showed the highest sensitivity in polar metabolite extraction, especially for amino acids.
- **Non-Polar Compound Extraction**: The diluted Matyash method showed the highest sensitivity in non-polar compound extraction, particularly for lipid compounds.
- **Reproducibility**: The diluted Matyash method exhibited high reproducibility in the extraction of both polar and non-polar compounds.
- **Overall Performance**: Overall, the diluted Matyash method performed the best in extracting both polar and non-polar compounds, with high sensitivity and good reproducibility.

### Conclusion
The study results indicate that the diluted Matyash method is the most suitable biphasic extraction method for simultaneously extracting polar and non-polar compounds, especially for metabolomics research with limited sample volumes. This method not only excels in the extraction of both polar and non-polar compounds but also offers high reproducibility and sensitivity, providing strong support for metabolomics research.