Robustness of Quantitative Diffusion Metrics from Four Models: A Prospective Study on the Influence of Scan‐Rescans, Voxel Size, Coils, and Observers

Jingyu Zhong,Xianwei Liu,Yangfan Hu,Yue Xing,Defang Ding,Xiang Ge,Yang Song,Silian Wang,Liwei Chen,Ying Zhu,Wenjie Lu,Huan Zhang,Weiwu Yao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29192
IF: 4.4
2023-12-20
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:Background Quantitative diffusion metrics provide additional microstructural information of diseases. The robustness of quantitative diffusion metrics should be established before clinical application. Purpose To evaluate the variability and reproducibility of quantitative diffusion MRI metrics. Study Type Prospective. Population 14 volunteers (7 men; median age, range, 28, 26–59 years). Field strength/Sequence 3.0‐T/Diffusion spectrum imaging. Assessment Brain MRI studies were performed four times per subject: involving different combinations of coil types and voxel sizes. Regions of interest of 13 brain anatomical sites were drawn by one observer twice and another observer once to allow interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility assessment. Twenty‐five quantitative metrics were calculated using four diffusion models. Statistical Tests The variability was evaluated with coefficients of variation (CV), and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD). The reproducibility was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the influence of factors on robustness of quantitative diffusion metrics. A two‐tailed P
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?