Quantitative muscle magnetic resonance imaging in limb‐girdle muscular dystrophy type R1 (LGMDR1): A prospective longitudinal cohort study
Johannes Forsting,Marian Wächter,Martijn Froeling,Marlena Rohm,Anne‐Katrin Güttsches,Alice De Lorenzo,Nicolina Südkamp,Abdulhadi Kocabas,Matthias Vorgerd,Elena Enax‐Krumova,Robert Rehmann,Lara Schlaffke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5172
2024-05-27
NMR in Biomedicine
Abstract:In a prospective longitudinal study of 13 LGMDR1 patients and age‐matched controls, clinical assessments, including clinical testing of muscle strength, patient questionnaires, and gait analysis, revealed significant deteriorations in ACTIVLIM, QMFM, and 10‐MWT over one year. Quantitative magnet resonance imaging (qMRI) parameters, particularly fat fraction (FF) and water T2 relaxation time, exhibited significant differences in muscles with varying fat infiltration levels, emphasising the potential of qMRI to provide insights into LGMDR1 pathophysiology. Limb‐girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) type R1 (LGMDR1) is the most common subtype of LGMD in Europe. Prospective longitudinal data, including clinical assessments and new biomarkers such as quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI), are needed to evaluate the natural course of the disease and therapeutic options. We evaluated eight thigh and seven leg muscles of 13 LGMDR1 patients (seven females, mean age 36.7 years, body mass index 23.9 kg/m2) and 13 healthy age‐ and gender‐matched controls in a prospective longitudinal design over 1 year. Clinical assessment included testing for muscle strength with quick motor function measure (QMFM), gait analysis and patient questionnaires (neuromuscular symptom score, activity limitation [ACTIVLIM]). MRI scans were performed on a 3‐T MRI scanner, including a Dixon‐based sequence, T2 mapping and diffusion tensor imaging. The qMRI values of fat fraction (FF), water T2 relaxation time (T2), fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity were analysed. Within the clinical outcome measures, significant deterioration between baseline and follow‐up was found for ACTIVLIM (p = 0.029), QMFM (p = 0.012). Analysis of qMRI parameters of the patient group revealed differences between time points for both FF and T2 when analysing all muscles (FF: p
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,biophysics,spectroscopy